Accurate and rapid delineation of wildfire-affected areas is essential in the era of climate-driven increases in fire frequency. This study compares and analyzes four techniques for identifying wildfire-affected areas using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery: (1) calibrated differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR); (2) differenced NDVI (dNDVI) with empirically defined thresholds (0.04–0.18); (3) supervised SVM classifiers applying linear, polynomial, and RBF kernels; and (4) unsupervised ISODATA clustering. In particular, this study proposes an SVM-based classification method that goes beyond conventional index- and threshold-based approaches by directly using the SWIR, NIR, and RED band values of Sentinel-2 as input variables. It also examines the potential of the ISODATA method, which can rapidly classify affected areas without a training process and further assess burn severity through a two-step clustering procedure. The experimental results showed that SVM was able to effectively identify affected areas using only post-fire imagery, and that ISODATA enabled fast classification and severity analysis without training data. This study performed a wildfire damage analysis through a comparison of various techniques and presents a data-driven framework that can be utilized in future wildfire response and policy-oriented recovery support.