Rhinoplasty in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) is challenging, and the surgical outcome of the nose is complicated to evaluate. The aim of this study was to assess the nasolabial appearance of patients with UCLP compared with a control group. Cross-sectional study. Riga Cleft Lip and Palate Centre, Latvia. All consecutive 35 patients born between 1994 and 2004 with nonsyndromic complete UCLP were included. Of 35 patients, 29 came for checkup; the mean age was 14.7 years (range 10-18). In the control group, 35 noncleft participants at 10 years of age were included. Nasolabial appearance was evaluated from 3-dimensional images using a 3-dimensional stereo-photogrammetric camera setup (3dMDface System), the results being analysed statistically. In UCLP group, a statistically significant difference between cleft and noncleft side was found only in alar wing length (P < .05). The difference of nasolabial anthropometric distances in the control group between the left and right side was not significant. The difference between the UCLP group and the control group was significant in all anthropometric distances except the lateral lip length to cupid’s bow. The nasolabial appearance with acceptable symmetry after cleft lip and reconstructive surgery of the nose was achieved. Symmetry of the nasolabial appearance in patients with UCLP differed from those in the control group. The 3D photographs with a proposed set of anthropometric landmarks for evaluation of nasolabial appearance seems to be a convenient, accurate, and noninvasive way to follow and evaluate patients after surgery.

Background and Objectives: Orbital floor fractures are challenging to treat, due to the complex orbital anatomy and limited surgical access. Emerging technologies—such as virtual surgical planning (VSP), 3D printing, patient-specific implants (PSIs), and intraoperative navigation—offer promising advancements to improve the surgical precision and clinical outcomes. This review systematically evaluates and synthesizes current technological modalities with respect to their accuracy, operative duration, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional outcomes. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, and PRIMO databases were searched for clinical studies published between 2019 and September 2024. Out of 229 articles identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using the PICO framework. Results: VSP and 3D printing enhanced diagnostics and presurgical planning, offering improved accuracy and reduced planning time. Pre-bent PSIs shaped on 3D models showed superior accuracy, lower operative times, and better cost efficiency compared to intraoperative mesh shaping. Custom-designed PSIs offered high precision and clinical benefit but required a longer production time. Intraoperative navigation improved implant positioning and reduced the complication rates, though a detailed cost analysis remains limited. Conclusions: VSP, 3D printing, and intraoperative navigation significantly improve surgical planning and outcomes in orbital floor reconstruction. Pre-bent PSIs provide a time- and cost-effective solution with strong clinical performance. While customized PSIs offer accuracy, they are less practical in time-sensitive settings. Navigation systems are promising tools that enhance outcomes and may serve as an alternative to custom implants when time or resources are limited.

Background/Objectives: Reconstruction of orbital floor fractures remains surgically challenging due to limited intraoperative visibility and complex anatomy. Inaccurate implant placement often leads to persistent complications and the need for a revision surgery. This study evaluated the clinical accuracy and re-operation rates of a preoperative 3D-printed model-assisted technique compared to the conventional intraoperative free-hand mesh bending method. Methods: A comparative ambispective study was conducted on 74 patients with isolated orbital floor fractures. The control group (n = 34, retrospective) underwent reconstruction using intraoperatively formed titanium meshes. In the study group (n = 40, prospective), patient-specific 3D-printed models, created by mirroring the healthy contralateral orbit, were used for preoperative mesh adaptation. Primary outcomes included the rate of revision surgery due to implant malposition, changes in orbital volume, and postoperative diplopia. Results: The 3D model group demonstrated a significantly lower rate of revision surgery compared to the control group. In the retrospective group, 5 patients (15%) required reoperation due to implant malposition, whereas no patients (0%) in the prospective 3D group required secondary intervention (p = 0.017). While both techniques effectively restored orbital volume, the 3D group showed greater volumetric precision with less variance. The mean volume difference in the affected orbit was 3078 ± 2204 mm³ in the control group, compared to 2390 ± 1893 mm³ in the study 3D group. At the 6-month follow-up, persistent diplopia was observed in 12% of the control group compared to only 3% in the study group. Conclusions: The use of in-house 3D-printed models for preoperative mesh forming significantly enhances surgical precision and eliminates the need for revision surgery due to implant malposition. This workflow offers a cost-effective, predictable, and accessible alternative to expensive patient-specific implants (PSIs) or intraoperative navigation systems, improving patient safety and long-term clinical outcomes.

Background and Clinical Significance: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe complication of antiresorptive therapies such as Zolendronic acid, used for bone metastases. Its management remains challenging, with outcomes often unpredictable. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), rich in growth factors, has been proposed as a potential adjunct to surgical treatment, aiming to promote tissue regeneration and improve patient outcomes. Case Presentation: We reported three clinical cases of MRONJ in patients previously treated with Zolendronic acid. All patients underwent surgical sequestrectomy combined with A-PRF application. Disease stages ranged from early to advanced (stages I–III). The success of treatment was evaluated based on how well the tissue healed, the extent of bone recovery, the amount of pain relief, and improvements in the patient’s quality of life. The patient with early-stage MRONJ achieved complete healing. On the other hand, the patients with stage II and III disease showed only partial clinical improvement. Nevertheless, all cases demonstrated significant subjective reduction in pain and enhanced overall quality of life following PRF therapy. Conclusions: Early-stage intervention offers the best prognosis for MRONJ. While A-PRF may improve postoperative comfort and quality of life, its curative effect appears limited in advanced disease. This highlights the need for further randomized clinical trials to demonstrate the role of A-PRF in the treatment of MRONJ.