Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common yet underrecognized complication of systemic chemotherapy, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Despite progress in targeted and immune-based therapies, platinum-based and fluoropyrimidine regimens, especially oxaliplatin-containing protocols, remain standard in GI cancer treatment and are linked to high rates of CIT. This complication often leads to treatment delays, dose reductions, and elevated bleeding risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies of CIT in GI malignancies. CIT arises from several mechanisms: direct cytotoxicity to megakaryocyte progenitors, disruption of the marrow microenvironment, thrombopoietin dysregulation, and immune-mediated platelet destruction. Platinum agents, antimetabolites, and immune checkpoint inhibitors can contribute to these effects. Oxaliplatin-induced CIT may occur acutely via immune mechanisms or chronically through marrow suppression. CIT affects 20–25% of solid tumor patients, with highest rates in those receiving gemcitabine (64%), carboplatin (58%), and oxaliplatin (50%). Within GI cancer regimens, FOLFOXIRI and S-1 plus oxaliplatin show higher CIT incidence compared to FOLFIRI and CAPIRI. Thrombocytopenia is graded by severity, from mild (Grade 1–2) to severe (Grade 3–4), and often necessitates treatment adjustments, transfusions, or supportive therapies. Current strategies include chemotherapy dose modification, platelet transfusion, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) like romiplostim and eltrombopag. While platelet transfusions help in acute settings, TPO-RAs may preserve dose intensity and reduce bleeding. Emerging agents targeting megakaryopoiesis and marrow protection offer promising avenues for long-term management.

Immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative approach in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, addressing historically poor survival rates in advanced-stage disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis demonstrate remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), exemplified by trials like NICHE-2 achieving exceptional pathological response rates. However, significant limitations persist, including resistance in some dMMR/MSI-H tumors, minimal efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors, and low overall response rates across most GI malignancies due to tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms. Predictive biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression are crucial for optimizing patient selection, while hypermutated pMMR tumors with POLE mutations represent emerging therapeutic opportunities. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, where survival remains dismal, combination strategies with chemotherapy and novel approaches like cancer vaccines show promise but lack transformative breakthroughs. Esophagogastric cancers benefit from ICIs combined with chemotherapy, particularly in MSI-H and HER2-positive tumors, while hepatocellular carcinoma has achieved significant progress with combinations like atezolizumab–bevacizumab and durvalumab–tremelimumab surpassing traditional therapies. Biliary tract cancers show modest improvements with durvalumab–chemotherapy combinations. Despite these advances, immunotherapy faces substantial challenges including immune-related adverse events, acquired resistance through cancer immunoediting, and the need for biomarker-driven approaches to overcome tumor microenvironment barriers. This review discusses key clinical trials, therapeutic progress, and emerging modalities including CAR T-cell therapies and combination strategies, emphasizing the critical need to address resistance mechanisms and refine precision medicine approaches to fully realize immunotherapy’s potential in GI malignancies.

The advent of targeted therapies has significantly transformed the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), improving survival across all disease stages. Discoveries of both common and rare oncogenic drivers are advancing rapidly, posing a challenge for clinicians and researchers to remain up to date in this dynamic field. This review highlights the evolving landscape of therapeutic strategies for actionable mutations in lung cancer, with particular attention given to the latest developments in KRAS-targeted treatments including non-G12C mutations, pan-RAS inhibitors, and agents targeting RAS-GTP. We also examine the existing standards of care for NSCLC harboring EGFR and ALK alterations, as well as emerging therapies poised for clinical use. Additional discussion includes advancements in therapies directed at MET, HER2, RET, ROS1, and FGFR alterations—each representing promising targets in NSCLC. This review concludes by exploring the growing evidence surrounding TROP-2 as a novel therapeutic target, especially relevant in cases where previous targeted treatments have failed.

Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cause of stroke, constituting 0.5–3% of all strokes with an extremely varied spectrum of presentation, predisposing factors, neuroimaging findings, and eventual outcomes. A high index of suspicion is needed because timely diagnosis can significantly alter the natural course of the disease, reduce acute complications, and improve long-term outcomes. Due to its myriad causative factors, protean presentation, and association with several systemic diseases, CVT is encountered not only by neurologists but also by emergency care practitioners, internists, hematologists, obstetricians, and pediatricians. Discussion: Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of treatment for CVT. Heparin and warfarin previously had been the anticoagulation of choice. Recently there has been an increased interest in utilizing direct-acting oral anticoagulants in the treatment of CVT given comparable safety and efficacy with ease of utilization. However recent clinical guidelines given by multiple societies including the American Stroke guidelines and European guidelines do not include these agents so far in their treatment recommendations. Ongoing multicentric clinical trials are currently reviewing the role of these agents in both short-term as well as long-term. Our review of the literature supports the safety and reinforces the efficacy of DOAC in the treatment of CVT. Additionally, patient satisfaction has been shown to be better with the use of DOAC. In conclusion, DOAC continues to have a valid role in the management of CVT.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common yet underrecognized complication of systemic chemotherapy, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Despite progress in targeted and immune-based therapies, platinum-based and fluoropyrimidine regimens, especially oxaliplatin-containing protocols, remain standard in GI cancer treatment and are linked to high rates of CIT. This complication often leads to treatment delays, dose reductions, and elevated bleeding risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies of CIT in GI malignancies.CIT arises from several mechanisms: direct cytotoxicity to megakaryocyte progenitors, disruption of the marrow microenvironment, thrombopoietin dysregulation, and immune-mediated platelet destruction. Platinum agents, antimetabolites, and immune checkpoint inhibitors can contribute to these effects. Oxaliplatin-induced CIT may occur acutely via immune mechanisms or chronically through marrow suppression. CIT affects 20–25% of solid tumor patients, with highest rates in those receiving gemcitabine (64%), carboplatin (58%), and oxaliplatin (50%). Within GI cancer regimens, FOLFOXIRI and S-1 plus oxaliplatin show higher CIT incidence compared to FOLFIRI and CAPIRI.Thrombocytopenia is graded by severity, from mild (Grade 1-2) to severe (Grade 3-4), and often necessitates treatment adjustments, transfusions, or supportive therapies. Current strategies include chemotherapy dose modification, platelet transfusion, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) like romiplostim and eltrombopag. While platelet transfusions help in acute settings, TPO-RAs may preserve dose intensity and reduce bleeding. Emerging agents targeting megakaryopoiesis and marrow protection offer promising avenues for long-term management.

This case report highlights a rare but significant complication associated with the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy, specifically splenic infarction, in a 67-year-old male with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) undergoing chemotherapy. G-CSFs, such as Neulasta (pegfilgrastim), are frequently used to prevent febrile neutropenia in cancer patients undergoing myelotoxic chemotherapy. While G-CSF is effective in reducing the risk of neutropenia, its administration has been linked to uncommon but severe complications like splenic infarction and rupture. Our patient, receiving dose-dense chemotherapy with G-CSF support, developed severe abdominal pain midway through treatment. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple splenic hypodensities consistent with splenic infarction, but no active bleeding. Conservative management was successfully employed, avoiding surgical intervention. This case underscores the need for vigilance when administering G-CSF, particularly in patients at high risk for complications, and contributes to the limited body of literature on G-CSF-induced splenic infarction.