INTRODUCTION: Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a well-known treatment for functional anorectal disorders. The effect of BFT was monitored in fecal incontinence (FI) patients with the Fecobionics test and with the conventional technologies, anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET). METHODS: Studies were performed in 12 patients before and after 8 weeks of biofeedback training. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score was obtained. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were measured before the bag was distended in the rectum until urge to defecate. Pressure recordings were made during Fecobionics evacuation. RESULTS: BFT resulted in 24% reduction in FISI scores (P < 0.01). Seven patients were characterized as responders. Anal pressures, the urge-to-defecate volume, and defecatory parameters did not change significantly during BFT. For ARM-BET, the maximum anal squeeze pressure, the urge-to-defecate volume, and the expulsion time were lower after BFT compared with those before BFT (P < 0.05). For Fecobionics, the change in urge volume (r = 0.74, P < 0.05) and the change in defecation index (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) were associated with the change in FISI score. None of the ARM-BET parameters were associated with the change in FISI score. It was studied whether any pre-BFT data could predict treatment success. The Fecobionics expulsion duration and the defecation index predicted the outcome (P < 0.05). The defecation index had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 72%. None of the ARM-BET parameters predicted the outcome (all P > 0.2). DISCUSSION: Fecobionics was used as a tool to monitor the effect of BFT and proved better than conventional technologies for monitoring and predicting the outcome in the FISI score.
Circulating cell-free RNAs (cfRNAs) have emerged as promising non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), offering insights into the disease’s prognosis. This study investigates the prognostic significance of the specific cfRNA biomarkers HPGD, PACS1, and TDP2 by employing the Taqman quantitative PCR (qPCR) to evaluate their expression levels in a cohort of 52 CRC patients. The methodology involved a robust statistical analysis to assess correlations between cfRNA levels and clinical parameters, including survival rates and recurrence incidences. Findings revealed a significant upregulation in the expression of HPGD and PACS1, while TDP2 displayed varying results, indicating a complex role in disease dynamics. Notably, lower expression levels of HPGD were associated with reduced survival, suggesting its potential as a negative prognostic indicator. Conversely, TDP2 levels correlated strongly with increased risks of recurrence, highlighting its clinical relevance in monitoring disease progression. Overall, this study elucidates the intricate interplay between these cfRNAs in the CRC prognosis. The results advocate for further exploratory studies to validate PACS1’s potential as a prognostic marker and reinforce the clinical significance of HPGD and TDP2 in the context of CRC management, positioning them as vital elements in the landscape of molecular oncology.
Background: Most of the public hospitals in Hong Kong provide a regular colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) service. The current retrospective study aims to review the long- and short-term outcomes of these services, so as to identify areas for improvement. Method and Results: From January 2017 to March 2020, 634 lesions in 623 patients were removed by an ESD technique in seven endoscopic units. The mean lesion size was 31 mm (SD 13 mm, range 10–95 mm), and the mean procedure time was 121 min (SD 67 min). En bloc resection and R0 resection could be achieved in 91.3% and 79.3% of the lesions, respectively. The intra-procedure perforation rate was 12.3%. The delayed bleeding rate was 2.1%, and the delayed perforation rate was 0.8%. Only 0.9% (6/634) of the procedures needed emergency surgical salvage due to complications. Most of the lesions were adenomas (564/634), and 55 of them were adenocarcinomas. The cumulative local recurrence rate was 4.0% at a mean follow-up of 34 months. In multivariate analysis, longer procedure time, submucosal fibrosis, hybrid ESD and piecemeal removal were associated with intra-procedure perforation. Risk factors for failed en bloc resection included non-granular and polypoid morphology, colonic location, longer procedure time and low centre volume. Malignant pathology without salvage surgery was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence. Conclusions: Colorectal ESD has been carried out in Hong Kong with acceptable short-and long-term outcomes despite the technique still being in the learning phase in some centres. Potential areas for improvement should include targeted training to speed up the procedure and enable better handling of difficult cases, aiming to decrease the perforation rate and local recurrence.