Automated image analysis plays an increasing role in radiology in detecting and quantifying image features outside of the perception of human eyes. Common AI-based approaches address a single medical problem, although patients often present with multiple interacting, frequently subclinical medical conditions. A holistic imaging diagnostics tool based on artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential of providing an overview of multi-system comorbidities within a single workflow. An interdisciplinary, multicentric team of medical experts and computer scientists designed a pipeline, comprising AI-based tools for the automated detection, quantification and characterization of the most common pulmonary, metabolic, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal comorbidities in chest computed tomography (CT). To provide a comprehensive evaluation of each patient, a multidimensional workflow was established with algorithms operating synchronously on a decentralized Joined Imaging Platform (JIP). The results of each patient are transferred to a dedicated database and summarized as a structured report with reference to available reference values and annotated sample images of detected pathologies. Hence, this tool allows for the comprehensive, large-scale analysis of imaging-biomarkers of comorbidities in chest CT, first in science and then in clinical routine. Moreover, this tool accommodates the quantitative analysis and classification of each pathology, providing integral diagnostic and prognostic value, and subsequently leading to improved preventive patient care and further possibilities for future studies.

Background and Objectives: Diet is an important modifiable cancer risk factor. Studies show that adherence to dietary guidelines reduces cancer risk and that adherence is affected by the complexity of dietary actions and the awareness of their effect. Intervention on complex nutrition issues requires clear nutrition messages to the public. To improve adherence for cancer prevention purposes, this research describes a method to provide tailored dietary recommendations by prioritizing dietary advice from the guideline, based on diet–disease relationships revealed by disease risk models. In addition, we developed the method as a risk calculator framework to provide the interoperability between risk models and guidelines. The framework is integrated into our cancer prevention app to facilitate risk communication and guideline adherence. Methods: We propose a simple and intuitive method to define and align cancer risk models and dietary guidelines using object-oriented programming paradigms, which can encapsulate the relationship between dietary advice, cancer risk, and lifestyle variables. The effect of each action can be simulated by applying modified dietary variables into the probability model to calculate an expected risk change. An interactive intervention is then designed to enhance understanding and promote the adoption of dietary actions. It consists of three steps: selecting dietary actions ranked by their preventive effect on cancer risk, modifying selected variables to desired values, and visualizing the simulated changes in cancer risk with dietary actions by humanoid pictogram. Results: We demonstrate the mapping of actions to the corresponding variables for a chosen cancer risk prediction model while ranking them according to their preventive effect. We further show that our method can easily be adapted to any dietary guideline. We implemented more than 10 cancer risk models covering common cancer types and integrated them into the system. Moreover, it is simple to add other cancer risk models to support the prevention of additional cancer types. As a key feature of a web-based application, the practical use of the method allows for the delivery of personalized action suggestions and notifications based on the user’s lifestyle factors. An usability testing was carried out between August and October 2023 with 9 participants using the guideline made by German Nutrition Society (DGE). The test proved the intervention’s effectiveness. Discussion: On the frontier of nutrition science and preventive medicine, our work is the first approach that combines risk models and dietary guidelines into a comprehensive digital health intervention system. It informs the user about the most impactful dietary behaviors, promotes adherence to dietary guidelines, and, accordingly, facilitates cancer risk reduction.

Background/Objectives: To assess diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) projection methods for rapid visual quality control of automated volumetric (3D) lung segmentations compared with slice-based 3D review of segmentation results for application in large-scale studies. Methods: Segmentation of right and left lungs on T1-weighted MRI of 300 participants of the German National Cohort (NAKO) study was performed using the nnU-NET framework. Three variants of 2D projection images of segmentation masks were created: maximum intensity projection (MIP) using pseudo-chromadepth encoding with different color spectra for right and left lung (Colored_MIP) and standard deviation projection of segmentation mask outlines, encoded in black-and-white (Gray_outline) or using color-encoding (Colored_outline). The worst of two ratings by two independent raters conducting slice-based review for segmentation errors on underlying imaging data and review for mislabeling errors served as the standard of reference. All variants were evaluated by five raters each for identification of segmentation errors and the majority rating was used as index test. The time required for review was recorded and diagnostic accuracies were calculated. Results: Sensitivities of Colored_MIP, Colored_outline and Gray_outline were 88.2% [95%-CI 78.7%; 94.4%], 89.5% [80.3%; 95.3%] and 78.9% [68.1%; 87.5%]; specificities were 98.7% [96.1%; 99.7%], 96.4% [93.1%; 98.5%] and 98.7% [96.1%; 99.7%]; and F1-scores were 0.918, 0.895 and 0.863, respectively. Mean time per case and rater required for evaluation was 2.8 ± 0.9 s for Colored_outline, 1.7 ± 0.1 s for Colored_MIP, and 2.0 ± 0.4 s for Gray_outline. Conclusions: The 2D segmentation mask projection images enabled the detection of segmentation errors of automated 3D segmentations of left and right lungs based on MRI with high diagnostic accuracy, especially when using color-encoding. The method enabled evaluation within a matter of seconds per case. Segmentation mask projection images may assist in visual quality control of automated segmentations in large-scale studies.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of MRI-derived 3D volumetry of lower lumbar vertebrae and dural sac segments using shape-based machine learning for the detection of Marfan syndrome (MFS) compared with dural sac diameter ratios (the current clinical standard). Materials and methods: The final study sample was 144 patients being evaluated for MFS from 01/2012 to 12/2016, of whom 81 were non-MFS patients (46 [67%] female, 36 ± 16 years) and 63 were MFS patients (36 [57%] female, 35 ± 11 years) according to the 2010 Revised Ghent Nosology. All patients underwent 1.5T MRI with isotropic 1 × 1 × 1 mm³ 3D T2-weighted acquisition of the lumbosacral spine. Segmentation and quantification of vertebral bodies L3-L5 and dural sac segments L3-S1 were performed using a shape-based machine learning algorithm. For comparison with the current clinical standard, anteroposterior diameters of vertebral bodies and dural sac were measured. Ratios between dural sac volume/diameter at the respective level and vertebral body volume/diameter were calculated. Results: Three-dimensional volumetry revealed larger dural sac volumes (p < 0.001) and volume ratios (p < 0.001) at L3-S1 levels in MFS patients compared with non-MFS patients. For the detection of MFS, 3D volumetry achieved higher AUCs at L3-S1 levels (0.743, 0.752, 0.808, and 0.824) compared with dural sac diameter ratios (0.673, 0.707, 0.791, and 0.848); a significant difference was observed only for L3 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: MRI-derived 3D volumetry of the lumbosacral dural sac and vertebral bodies is a feasible method for quantifying dural ectasia using shape-based machine learning. Non-inferior diagnostic accuracy was observed compared with dural sac diameter ratio (the current clinical standard for MFS detection).