The aim of this longitudinal study is to determine how stressful life events, psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety change in a cohort of students from one nursing faculty during the education process and to document the factors related to psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety during the fourth year of education. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were applied to students within the faculty of nursing within the first week of the 2018–2019 academic year. All students were asked to answer a questionnaire measuring their possible stressful life events (first timepoint). The process was repeated for the same students again in the fourth year (second timepoint). The changes between the two timepoints were examined. Nursing students’ GHQ-12 and STAI scores and averages increased significantly from first timepoint to second timepoint (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase in the prevalence of depressive symptoms for the ≥21 cut-off point of BDI in the fourth year of the study cohort. A significant increase in perceived stress levels between the two timepoints was also found for numerous stressful life events. As a result of linear regression, “dissatisfaction with major” was found as a determinant on all scale scores. The psychological indicators increased significantly in nursing students during their education. Interventions to reduce stress, anxiety, and psychological distress are needed to improve the mental health status of nursing students.

Background: Medical education is considered one of the most academically and emotionally demanding training programs. Throughout their education, medical students are exposed to various factors that can lead to psychological distress, depression, and anxiety. The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine the changes in psychological distress, depression, anxiety levels and internet addiction among medical students throughout their six-year education and to identify the contributing factors. Methods: The study cohort consisted of 282 students who enrolled in the medical faculty in the 2017–2018 academic year. A questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Young Internet Addiction Test (IAT) was administered to the students during the first week of their education. The same questionnaire was readministered at the end of the third and sixth years. Friedman’s variance analysis was used to compare measurement data across the three time points, while Cochran’s Q Test was employed for categorical variables. Results: The median scores of the GHQ-12, BDI, S-Anxiety, and IAT significantly increased from the first to the sixth year (p < 0.05). The prevalence of depressive symptoms, S-Anxiety, and risky internet use significantly increased from the first to the final year, particularly between the third and sixth years. According to logistic regression analysis based on sixth-year data, students whose fathers were university graduates, who had been diagnosed with COVID-19, and who were dissatisfied with their social lives were found to be at increased risk for psychological distress and depression. Students with high parental expectations were found to be at risk of depression and S-anxiety. Those dissatisfied with their occupational choice were at risk for both psychological distress and S-anxiety. Conclusions: It was found that the mental health of medical students deteriorated during their education, especially during the clinical years. Given that these students will be responsible for protecting and improving public health in the future, it is essential to prioritize their own mental well-being. Interventions aimed at preserving the mental health of medical students should be planned.

Background: Moral sensitivity is thought to be the first step in real-life moral decision-making. In the field of health, which is seen as an ethically loaded practice, monitoring the ethical sensitivity of service providers is essential both in terms of service quality and ethical practice. This study aimed to determine the moral sensitivity and the factors that may be related to the moral sensitivity of interns.Methods: A total of 116 intern doctors who accepted to participate were included in the study without using a sampling method. In order to collect the data, a data collection form consisting of sociodemographic characteristics of the interns and Moral Sensitivity Questionaire (MSQ) was used. As the scores obtained from the scale showed normal distribution, Student's t-test was used for the comparison of two groups, and the ANOVA test was used for the comparison of three groups.Results: The mean MSQ total score of the volunteers participating in the study was 89.14. The moral sensitivity level was higher in women in total score, benevolence, and orientation subscale scores (p <0.05). According to the total score, autonomy, meaning, rules, and orientation subscale scores, the moral sensitivity levels of individuals with high-income perception were higher (p <0.05).Conclusion: The findings show that the interns’ moral sensitivity level is high-intermediate when the average Moral Sensitivity Questionaire scores are taken into consideration. The female gender and the perception of the high-income level positively affects the moral sensitivity of interns. Follow-up studies and qualitative research can be planned to clarify the reasons for this effect.

Objective: This study is aimed to define osteoporosis knowledge and health beliefs of women. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 1240 women between the ages 15 and 64 in Konyaaltı/Antalya/Türkiye. Osteoporosis Knowledge Test (OKT) and Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale (OHBS) were administered to women. Results: The mean total score of OKT was 19.90±3.11, OHBS Susceptibility score 18.32±5.77, Seriousness score 20.45±5.27, Benefits of Exercise score 26.73±3.55, Benefits of Calcium Intake score 24.82±4.22, Barriers to Exercise score 12.77±5.15, Barriers to Calcium Intake score 12.14±4.53, Health Motivation score was found to be 23.95±3.49. When osteoporosis knowledge score was divided by the median value and evaluated as a risk criterion, the women who studied 5 years and less were 2.46 (1.84-3.27) times, who studied 6-8 years were 1.65 (1.18-2.29) times, whose caffeine consumption less than 200 mg/day were 1.43 (1.07-1.89) times, who was in menapouse were 1.37 (1.05-1.76) times riskier for osteoporosis knowledge to be lower than the median level in all women. Conclusion: The level of osteoporosis knowledge and health beliefs of women living in Konyaaltı/Antalya were found to be higher than those determined in other countries and in our country. Informative events should be organized and primary health care workers should educate women of all ages, especially women with low education levels, about osteoporosis and preventive measures.