Joanna Maria Wybranska

Dr. Joanna Maria Wybranska

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

9 July 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJoanna Maria Wybranska
Joanna Maria Wybranska
LPLorenz Pieper
Lorenz Pieper
CWChristian Wybranski
Christian Wybranski
PGPhilipp Genseke
Philipp Genseke
JWJan Wuestemann
Jan Wuestemann
JMJakub Mitura
Jakub Mitura
Background/Objectives: This study evaluates whether combining 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT derived imaging biomarkers with clinical risk factors improves the prediction of early biochemical recurrence (eBCR) or clinical progress in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after primary treatment, using machine learning (ML) models. Methods: We analyzed data from 93 high-risk PCa patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and received primary treatment at a single center. Two predictive models were developed: a logistic regression (LR) model and an ML derived probabilistic graphical model (PGM) based on a naïve Bayes framework. Both models were compared against each other and against the CAPRA risk score. The models’ input variables were selected based on statistical analysis and domain expertise including a literature review and expert input. A decision tree was derived from the PGM to translate its probabilistic reasoning into a transparent classifier. Results: The five key input variables were as follows: binarized CAPRA score, maximal intraprostatic PSMA uptake intensity (SUVmax), presence of bone metastases, nodal involvement at common iliac bifurcation, and seminal vesicle infiltration. The PGM achieved superior predictive performance with a balanced accuracy of 0.73, sensitivity of 0.60, and specificity of 0.86, substantially outperforming both the LR (balanced accuracy: 0.50, sensitivity: 0.00, specificity: 1.00) and CAPRA (balanced accuracy: 0.59, sensitivity: 0.20, specificity: 0.99). The decision tree provided an explainable classifier with CAPRA as a primary branch node, followed by SUVmax and specific PET-detected tumor sites. Conclusions: Integrating 68Ga-PSMA-11 imaging biomarkers with clinical parameters, such as CAPRA, significantly improves models to predict progression in patients with high-risk PCa undergoing primary treatment. The PGM offers superior balanced accuracy and enables risk stratification that may guide personalized treatment decisions.