The bone scan index (BSI), initially introduced for metastatic prostate cancer, quantifies the osseous tumor load from planar bone scans. Following the basic idea of radiomics, this method incorporates specific deep-learning techniques (artificial neural network) in its development to provide automatic calculation, feature extraction, and diagnostic support. As its performance in tumor entities, not including prostate cancer, remains unclear, our aim was to obtain more data about this aspect. The results of BSI evaluation of bone scans from 951 consecutive patients with different tumors were retrospectively compared to clinical reports (bone metastases, yes/no). Statistical analysis included entity-specific receiver operating characteristics to determine optimized BSI cut-off values. In addition to prostate cancer (cut-off = 0.27%, sensitivity (SN) = 87%, specificity (SP) = 99%), the algorithm used provided comparable results for breast cancer (cut-off 0.18%, SN = 83%, SP = 87%) and colorectal cancer (cut-off = 0.10%, SN = 100%, SP = 90%). Worse performance was observed for lung cancer (cut-off = 0.06%, SN = 63%, SP = 70%) and renal cell carcinoma (cut-off = 0.30%, SN = 75%, SP = 84%). The algorithm did not perform satisfactorily in melanoma (SN = 60%). For most entities, a high negative predictive value (NPV ≥ 87.5%, melanoma 80%) was determined, whereas positive predictive value (PPV) was clinically not applicable. Automatically determined BSI showed good sensitivity and specificity in prostate cancer and various other entities. Particularly, the high NPV encourages applying BSI as a tool for computer-aided diagnostic in various tumor entities.

The Thyroid Imaging and Reporting System (TIRADS) allows a sonographic assessment of the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules (TNs). To date, there is a lack of systematic data about the change in ultrasound (US) features after therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize the changes in autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTNs) after radioiodine therapy (RIT) by using TIRADS. We retrospectively assessed data from 68 patients with AFTNs treated with RIT between 2016 and 2018 who had available first and second follow-up US imaging. Before RIT, 69.1% of the AFTNs were classified as low-risk TNs when applying Kwak TIRADS (EU-TIRADS 52.9%), 22.1% were intermediate-risk TNs (EU-TIRADS 19.1%), and 8.8% were high-risk TNs (EU-TIRADS 27.9%). Twelve months after RIT, 22.1% of the AFTNs showed features of high-risk TNs according to Kwak TIRADS (EU-TIRADS 45.6%). The proportion of intermediate TNs also increased to 36.8% (EU-TIRADS 29.4%), and 41.2% were low-risk TNs (EU-TIRADS 25%). A significant percentage of AFTNs presented with features suspicious for malignancy according to TIRADS before RIT, and this number increased significantly after therapy. Therefore, before thyroid US, thorough anamnesis regarding prior radioiodine treatment is necessary to prevent unneeded diagnostic procedures.

While multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is known to be a specific and reliable modality for the diagnosis of non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC), positron emission tomography (PET) using ⁶⁸Ga labeled ligands targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is known for its reliable detection of prostate cancer, being the most sensitive modality for the assessment of the extra-prostatic extension of the disease and the establishment of a diagnosis, even before biopsy. Background/Objectives: Here, we compared these modalities in regards to the localization of intraprostatic cancer lesions prior to local HDR brachytherapy. Methods: A cohort of 27 patients received both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT. Based on 24 intraprostatic segments, two readers each scored the risk of tumor-like alteration in each imaging modality. The detectability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The histopathological findings from biopsy were used as the gold standard in each segment. In addition, we applied a patient-based “congruence” concept to quantify the interobserver and intermodality agreement. Results: For the ROC analysis, we included 447 segments (19 patients), with their respective histological references. The two readers of the MRI reached an AUC of 0.770 and 0.781, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.75). The PET/CT readers reached an AUC of 0.684 and 0.608, respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The segment-wise intermodality comparison showed a significant superiority of MRI (AUC = 0.815) compared to PET/CT (AUC = 0.690) (p = 0.006). Via a patient-based analysis, a superiority of MRI in terms of relative agreement with the biopsy result was observed (n = 19 patients). We found congruence scores of 83% (MRI) and 76% (PET/CT, p = 0.034), respectively. Using an adjusted “near total agreement” score (adjacent segments with positive scores of 4 or 5 counted as congruent), we found an increase in the agreement, with a score of 96.5% for MRI and 92.7% for PET/CT, with significant difference (p = 0.024). Conclusions: This study suggests that in a small collective of low-/intermediate risk prostate cancer, mpMRI is superior for the detection of intraprostatic lesions as compared to PSMA-PET/CT. We also found a higher relative agreement between MRI and biopsy as compared to that for PET/CT. However, further studies including a larger number of patients and readers are necessary to draw solid conclusions.

Background: Thyroid nodules are very common. In most cases, they are benign, but they can be malignant in a low percentage of cases. The accurate assessment of these nodules is critical to choosing the next diagnostic steps and potential treatment. Ultrasound (US) imaging, the primary modality for assessing these nodules, can lack objectivity due to varying expertise among physicians. This leads to observer variability, potentially affecting patient outcomes. Purpose: This study aims to assess the potential of a Decision Support System (DSS) in reducing these variabilities for thyroid nodule detection and region estimation using US images, particularly in lesser experienced physicians. Methods: Three physicians with varying levels of experience evaluated thyroid nodules on US images, focusing on nodule detection and estimating cystic and solid regions. The outcomes were compared to those obtained from a DSS for comparison. Metrics such as classification match percentage and variance percentage were used to quantify differences. Results: Notable disparities exist between physician evaluations and the DSS assessments: the overall classification match percentage was just 19.2%. Individually, Physicians 1, 2, and 3 had match percentages of 57.6%, 42.3%, and 46.1% with the DSS, respectively. Variances in assessments highlight the subjectivity and observer variability based on physician experience levels. Conclusions: The evident variability among physician evaluations underscores the need for supplementary decision-making tools. Given its consistency, the CAD offers potential as a reliable “second opinion” tool, minimizing human-induced variabilities in the critical diagnostic process of thyroid nodules using US images. Future integration of such systems could bolster diagnostic precision and improve patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: This study evaluates whether combining ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT derived imaging biomarkers with clinical risk factors improves the prediction of early biochemical recurrence (eBCR) or clinical progress in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after primary treatment, using machine learning (ML) models. Methods: We analyzed data from 93 high-risk PCa patients who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and received primary treatment at a single center. Two predictive models were developed: a logistic regression (LR) model and an ML derived probabilistic graphical model (PGM) based on a naïve Bayes framework. Both models were compared against each other and against the CAPRA risk score. The models’ input variables were selected based on statistical analysis and domain expertise including a literature review and expert input. A decision tree was derived from the PGM to translate its probabilistic reasoning into a transparent classifier. Results: The five key input variables were as follows: binarized CAPRA score, maximal intraprostatic PSMA uptake intensity (SUVmax), presence of bone metastases, nodal involvement at common iliac bifurcation, and seminal vesicle infiltration. The PGM achieved superior predictive performance with a balanced accuracy of 0.73, sensitivity of 0.60, and specificity of 0.86, substantially outperforming both the LR (balanced accuracy: 0.50, sensitivity: 0.00, specificity: 1.00) and CAPRA (balanced accuracy: 0.59, sensitivity: 0.20, specificity: 0.99). The decision tree provided an explainable classifier with CAPRA as a primary branch node, followed by SUVmax and specific PET-detected tumor sites. Conclusions: Integrating ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 imaging biomarkers with clinical parameters, such as CAPRA, significantly improves models to predict progression in patients with high-risk PCa undergoing primary treatment. The PGM offers superior balanced accuracy and enables risk stratification that may guide personalized treatment decisions.