Purpose: The aim of this study was to review the scientific evidence and describe the ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to pharmacological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines in the MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases. Articles were filtered based on title and abstract considering the selection criteria and subsequently filtered by full-text reading. The resulting articles were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality Tools. Study characteristics and results were extracted and presented in structured tables to conduct a narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 2852 published articles were extracted using our strategy. After removing duplicates, 2841 articles were screened based on title and abstract, 102 articles were evaluated using quality tools, and 69 articles were filtered by full-text reading. Through this search strategy, 60 articles met all the inclusion criteria and seven articles, through a search update conducted in the same manner, were included. This resulted in 67 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 11 were experimental and 56 were observational. The therapies related to ocular TEAEs were alemtuzumab, amantadine, fingolimod, steroids, CTLA-4 Ig, estriol, interferon β, natalizumab, hyperbaric oxygen, rituximab, siponimod, teriflunomide, and tovaxin. Fingolimod and siponimod were commonly associated with macular edema, interferon β was associated with retinopathy, alemtuzumab was associated with thyroid eye disease, amantadine was associated with corneal edema, and steroids were associated with acute retinal necrosis. Opportunistic infections were also found, and there was one life-threatening case. Conclusions: Our search revealed different methodological assessments of the topic. However, longitudinal studies regarding ocular TEAEs related to multiple sclerosis therapy are necessary to provide evidence-based recommendations, especially in understudied regions such as Latin America and Africa. Physicians should monitor ocular symptoms in patients being treated for multiple sclerosis and consider an interdisciplinary approach. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42020106886

Purpose: To describe ocular surface characteristics and tests’ results in a healthy pediatric population. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study with 60 healthy children, obtaining consent, OSDI and screen use survey and conducting ocular surface tests. Statistical univariate analysis for categorical and quantitative variables was made. To describe the correlation of the results in both eyes, we used a model of random effects. To characterize the possible profiles of device use, we applied the mixed-cluster methodology. Results: Sixty healthy children between 7 and 17 years old were evaluated. Girl’s proportion was 41.6%. Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index Score was 9.98± 8.49 points. Daily screen time was 5.59± 2.77 hours and the most popular screen was the smartphone. Mean results (with standard deviations or confidence intervals) of ocular surface tests were blink frequency while reading on paper, 6.8± 5.68 times per minute; blink frequency while reading on screen, 8.7± 7.14 times per minute; tear meniscus height, 0.19[0.18– 0.2] mm; non-invasive tear break-up time, 12.44[10.99– 13.9] seconds; nasal conjunctival redness, 0.86[0.77– 0.94]; temporal conjunctival redness, 0.96[0.87– 1.04]; tear osmolarity, 299.3[295.14– 303.45] mmol; and Schirmer test, 23.73[21.28– 26.18] mm. Lid margin was irregular in three eyes; 44.7% had thin lipid layer; lissamine green staining was positive in 70.8%; fluorescein staining was positive in 47.4%; 36.64% exhibited partial meibomian gland loss. Conclusion: Considering the scarcity of specific pediatric values of ocular surface tests, we performed a clinical investigation involving the complete pool of ocular surface tests in children. Although healthy children were included in this study, we found that all the participants had at least one abnormal result and 33.33% had dry eye disease diagnosis, according to the TFOS DEWS II. It would be relevant to carry out further multicentric studies to compare our ocular surface tests’ results with other groups of children.

Objectives: Increased exposure to digital devices as part of online classes increases susceptibility to visual impairments, particularly among school students taught using e-learning strategies. This study aimed to identify the impact of remote learning during the COVID-19 lockdown on children’s visual health. Design: Systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources: Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect databases from the year 2020 onwards. Eligibility criteria: We included cross-sectional, case–control, cohort studies, case series and case reports, published in English, Spanish or French, that approached the effects of remote learning during the COVID-19 lockdown on visual health in neurotypical children. Data extraction and synthesis: We included a total of 21 articles with previous quality assessments using the Joanna Briggs checklist. Risk of bias assessment was applied using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for before-and-after studies with no control group; the tool developed by Hoy et al to assess cross-sectional studies; the Murad et al tool to evaluate the methodological quality of case reports and case series; and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Results: All but one study reported a deleterious impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on visual health in children. Overall, the most frequently identified ocular effects were refractive errors, accommodation disturbances and visual symptoms such as dry eye and asthenopia. Conclusions: Increased dependence on digital devices for online classes has either induced or exacerbated visual disturbances, such as rapid progression of myopia, dry eye and visual fatigue symptoms, and vergence and accommodation disturbances, in children who engaged in remote learning during the COVID-19 lockdown. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022307107.

Purpose: To describe the epidemiology, clinical features, and classification of uveitis in a large cohort of Colombian patients. Methods: Data were collected from seven ophthalmological referral centers in the four main cities in Colombia. The study included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of uveitis from January 2010 to December 2022. Information on demographics, ophthalmic examination findings, uveitis classification, and etiology was recorded. Results: The study reviewed 3,404 clinical records of patients with uveitis. The mean age at diagnosis was 41.1 (SD 19.0) years, and 54.2% of the patients were female. Overall, 1,341(39.4%) were infectious, 626 (18.4%) non-infectious, and four masquerade syndromes (0.1%). The most common types of uveitis were unilateral (66.7%), acute (48.3%), and non-granulomatous (83%). Anterior uveitis was the most common anatomical localization (49.5%), followed by posterior uveitis (22.9%), panuveitis (22.3%), and intermediate uveitis (5.2%). A diagnosis was established in 3,252 (95.5%) cases; idiopathic was the most common cause (27.7%), followed by toxoplasmosis (25.3%) and virus-associated uveitis (6.4%). The age group between 30 and 50 exhibited the highest frequency of uveitis. Conclusion: This multicenter study comprehensively describes uveitis characteristics in Colombian patients, providing valuable insights into its demographic and clinical features. The study findings emphasize the need to continue updating the changing patterns of uveitis to improve diagnosis and treatment strategies for diseases associated with intraocular inflammation.

Red blood cell (RBC), accounting for approximately 45% of total blood volume, are essential for oxygen delivery and carbon dioxide removal. Their unique biconcave morphology, high surface area-to-volume ratio, and remarkable deformability enable them to navigate microvessels narrower than their resting diameter, ensuring efficient microcirculation. RBC deformability is primarily determined by membrane viscoelasticity, cytoplasmic viscosity, and cell geometry, all of which can be altered under various physiological and pathological conditions. Reduced deformability is a hallmark of numerous diseases, including sickle cell disease, malaria, diabetes mellitus, sepsis, ischemia–reperfusion injury, and storage lesions in transfused blood. As these mechanical changes often precede overt clinical symptoms, RBC deformability is increasingly recognized as a sensitive biomarker for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. Over the past decades, diverse techniques have been developed to measure RBC deformability. These include single-cell methods such as micropipette aspiration, optical tweezers, atomic force microscopy, magnetic twisting cytometry, and quantitative phase imaging; bulk approaches like blood viscometry, ektacytometry, filtration assays, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate; and emerging microfluidic platforms capable of high-throughput, physiologically relevant measurements. Each method captures distinct aspects of RBC mechanics, offering unique advantages and limitations. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the pathophysiological significance of RBC deformability and the methods for its measurement. We discuss disease contexts in which deformability is altered, outline mechanical models describing RBC viscoelasticity, and provide a comparative analysis of measurement techniques. Our aim is to guide the selection of appropriate approaches for research and clinical applications, and to highlight opportunities for developing robust, clinically translatable diagnostic tools.