Fabio Napolitano

Prof. Fabio Napolitano

Università Degli Studi Della Basilicata
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2010 in Food Quality and Preference
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fabio NapolitanoFabio Napolitano
Fabio Napolitano
Ada BraghieriAda Braghieri
Ada Braghieri
EPE. Piasentier
E. Piasentier
SFS. Favotto
S. Favotto
Simona NaspettiSimona Naspetti
Simona Naspetti
Raffaele ZanoliRaffaele Zanoli
Raffaele Zanoli

1 January 2013 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAntonio Girolami
Antonio Girolami
Fabio NapolitanoFabio Napolitano
Fabio Napolitano
DFDaniela Faraone
Daniela Faraone
Ada BraghieriAda Braghieri
Ada Braghieri

1 November 2010 in Trends in Food Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fabio NapolitanoFabio Napolitano
Fabio Napolitano
AGAntonio Girolami
Antonio Girolami
Ada BraghieriAda Braghieri
Ada Braghieri

2 October 2019 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSilvana Mattiello
Silvana Mattiello
MBMonica Battini
Monica Battini
Giuseppe De RosaGiuseppe De Rosa
Giuseppe De Rosa
Fabio NapolitanoFabio Napolitano
Fabio Napolitano
CDCatherine Dwyer
Catherine Dwyer
Until now, most research has focused on the development of indicators of negative welfare, and relatively few studies provide information on valid, reliable, and feasible indicators addressing positive aspects of animal welfare. However, a lack of suffering does not guarantee that animals are experiencing a positive welfare state. The aim of the present review is to identify promising valid and reliable animal-based indicators for the assessment of positive welfare that might be included in welfare assessment protocols for ruminants, and to discuss them in the light of the five domains model, highlighting possible gaps to be filled by future research. Based on the existing literature in the main databases, each indicator was evaluated in terms of its validity, reliability, and on-farm feasibility. Some valid indicators were identified, but a lot of the validity evidence is based on their absence when a negative situation is present; furthermore, only a few indicators are available in the domains of Nutrition and Health. Reliability has been seldom addressed. On-farm feasibility could be increased by developing specific sampling strategies and/or relying on the use of video- or automatic-recording devices. In conclusion, several indicators are potentially available (e.g., synchronisation of lying and feeding, coat or fleece condition, qualitative behaviour assessment), but further research is required.

1 March 2008 in Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fabio NapolitanoFabio Napolitano
Fabio Napolitano
Giuseppe De RosaGiuseppe De Rosa
Giuseppe De Rosa
ASAgostino Sevi
Agostino Sevi

22 March 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMarisa C. Caruso
Marisa C. Caruso
Ada BraghieriAda Braghieri
Ada Braghieri
ACAngela Capece
Angela Capece
Fabio NapolitanoFabio Napolitano
Fabio Napolitano
Patrizia RomanoPatrizia Romano
Patrizia Romano
FRANCESCO GENOVESEFRANCESCO GENOVESE
FRANCESCO GENOVESE
The production of biogas from anaerobic digestion (AD) of residual agro-food biomasses represents an opportunity for alternative production of energy from renewable sources, according to the European Union legislation on renewable energy. This review provides an overview of the various aspects involved in this process with a focus on the best process conditions to be used for AD-based biogas production from residual agro-food biomasses. After a schematic description of the AD phases, the biogas plants with advanced technologies were described, pointing out the strengths and the weaknesses of the different digester technologies and indicating the main parameters and operating conditions to be monitored. Subsequently, a brief analysis of the factors affecting methane yield from manure AD was conducted and the AD of fruit and vegetables waste was examined. Particular attention was given to studies on co-digestion and pre-treatments as strategies to improve biogas yield. Finally, the selection of specific microorganisms and the genetic manipulation of anaerobic bacteria to speed up the AD process was illustrated. The open challenges concern the achievement of the highest renewable energy yields reusing agro-food waste with the lowest environmental impact and an increment of competitiveness of the agricultural sector in the perspective of a circular economy.