Introduction: This study intends to compare the accuracy and pertinence of sonographic findings obtained by a sonographer in a Basic Emergency Service (BES) with the imaging findings at the Referral Hospital (RH).Methods: Thirty‐one patients suspected of having renal pathology underwent initial renal sonography screening with sonographer reporting at the BES and were subsequently referred to the RH for additional imaging examinations. The results of both examinations were compared to verify whether the findings from the BES were confirmed by the radiologist in the RH and to ensure that the patient referrals from BES to RH were appropriate.Results: In our sample, most patients (80%) exhibited varying degrees of pyelocaliceal distension, with nearly half (48%) presenting obstructions. A strong association between the sonographic findings in the BES and the RH was found in the variables “Dilatation of pyelocaliceal system” (V=0.895; p=0.000), “Simple cystic formation” (V=0.878; p=0.000), respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between BES and RH findings, indicating a strong association between these two variables respectively (k=0.890; p=0.000) and (k=0.870; p=0.000). In this research, an achieved sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 85% were demonstrated in the identification of pyelocaliceal dilatation.Conclusion: Renal sonographer reporting screening successfully detected abnormalities in the urinary system of patients suspected of having renal colic. The sonographic data obtained at the BES demonstrated a strong correlation with the additional imaging findings from the RH in Portugal. These results suggest that Radiographers/Sonographers can have an important role in the preliminary assessment of urgent renal pathology in remote areas, contributing to a correct referral and early treatment.

Background/Objectives: Ultrasonography is a diagnostic modality characterized by high sensitivity in detecting hepato-biliary pathology, particularly intrahepatic biliary duct dilation. This study compares the sonographic findings obtained by a radiographer/sonographer in a Basic Emergency Service (BES) using Point-of-Care Ultrasonography (POCUS) in Portugal with the sonographic findings from the same patients acquired by radiologists at a referral hospital (RH) for suspected intrahepatic biliary dilatation. Methods: Nineteen patients presenting with right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and suspected abdominal pathology underwent sonographic screening using POCUS in the BES. Subsequently, the same patients were referred to the RH, where a radiologist performed a comprehensive ultrasound. Both examinations were compared to determine whether the findings obtained in the BES were confirmed by radiologists in the RH. Results: Cholestasis, cholangitis, lithiasis, pancreatitis, peri-ampullary lithiasis, and neoplasms were observed in association with intrahepatic biliary dilation in this study sample. All six variables showed a strong association between the BES and RH findings (Cramer’s V > 0.6; p < 0.006). A strong kappa measure of agreement between the radiographer and radiologist findings was obtained in “cholelithiasis/sludge/gallbladder acute sonographic changes” (k = 0.802; p = 0.000). A moderate kappa value was obtained for the variable “abdominal free fluid”, (k = 0.706; p = 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, all patients referred from the BES to the RH required hospitalization for treatment and additional imaging exams. Although pre-hospital screening ultrasound is not intended for definitive diagnoses, the early detection of intrahepatic biliary tract dilatation through screening sonography played a significant role in the clinical referral of patients, with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 75%.

Screening ultrasound, including Point of Care Ultrasonography (POCUS), is widely utilized for rapid clinical guidance in diverse healthcare settings. In this case report, a 34-year-old male with recurrent biliary colic symptoms underwent a Basic Emergency Service ultrasound, revealing a 13 mm gallbladder calculus and signs of inflammation, and was promptly referred to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Medical specialist confirmation at the hospital underscored the significance of early detection through POCUS. Despite inconclusive laboratory results, the detailed ultrasound assessment provided a comprehensive understanding, emphasizing the tool's value in averting complications. Thus, screening ultrasound played a pivotal role in justifying the hospital referral, showcasing its vital role in healthcare, especially in resource-limited settings. The judicious use of POCUS can lead to superior outcomes, avoiding unnecessary referrals for non-emergent cases.