Andrzej Kacperek

Prof. Dr. Andrzej Kacperek

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2013 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJ. Sorriaux
J. Sorriaux
AKAndrzej Kacperek
Andrzej Kacperek
SRS. Rossomme
S. Rossomme
JLJ.A. Lee
J.A. Lee
DBD. Bertrand
D. Bertrand
ESEdmond Sterpin
Edmond Sterpin

1 August 2005 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBertil Damato
Bertil Damato
AKAndrzej Kacperek
Andrzej Kacperek
MCMona Chopra
Mona Chopra
ICIan R. Campbell
Ian R. Campbell
RER. Douglas Errington
R. Douglas Errington

1 May 2016 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PCPankaj Chaudhary
Pankaj Chaudhary
TMThomas I. Marshall
Thomas I. Marshall
FCFrederick J Currell
Frederick J Currell
AKAndrzej Kacperek
Andrzej Kacperek
GSGiuseppe Schettino
Giuseppe Schettino
KPKevin Prise
Kevin Prise
To investigate the variations in induction and repair of DNA damage along the proton path, after a previous report on the increasing biological effectiveness along clinically modulated 60-MeV proton beams. Human skin fibroblast (AG01522) cells were irradiated along a monoenergetic and a modulated spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) proton beam used for treating ocular melanoma at the Douglas Cyclotron, Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Wirral, Liverpool, United Kingdom. The DNA damage response was studied using the 53BP1 foci formation assay. The linear energy transfer (LET) dependence was studied by irradiating the cells at depths corresponding to entrance, proximal, middle, and distal positions of SOBP and the entrance and peak position for the pristine beam. A significant amount of persistent foci was observed at the distal end of the SOBP, suggesting complex residual DNA double-strand break damage induction corresponding to the highest LET values achievable by modulated proton beams. Unlike the directly irradiated, medium-sharing bystander cells did not show any significant increase in residual foci. The DNA damage response along the proton beam path was similar to the response of X rays, confirming the low-LET quality of the proton exposure. However, at the distal end of SOBP our data indicate an increased complexity of DNA lesions and slower repair kinetics. A lack of significant induction of 53BP1 foci in the bystander cells suggests a minor role of cell signaling for DNA damage under these conditions.

1 September 2005 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBertil Damato
Bertil Damato
AKAndrzej Kacperek
Andrzej Kacperek
MCMona Chopra
Mona Chopra
MSMartin A. Sheen
Martin A. Sheen
ICIan R. Campbell
Ian R. Campbell
RER. Douglas Errington
R. Douglas Errington

1 September 1997 in British Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlexander J E Foss
Alexander J E Foss
IWIrene Whelehan
Irene Whelehan
JHJohn L Hungerford
John L Hungerford
DADavid F Anderson
David F Anderson
RER Douglas Errington
R Douglas Errington
MSMartin Sheen
Martin Sheen
AIMS/BACKGROUND Proton beam radiotherapy can effectively treat primary uveal melanomas of any size. Some patients, however, develop adverse late effects following treatment and the purpose of this study was to determine which factors give rise to a poor local outcome. METHODS The hospital records from a first cohort of 127 patients treated by protons from 1989 to 1992 were reviewed retrospectively. The presence of rubeosis was selected as a measure of significant ocular damage. Split file analysis was performed with 73 cases forming a test group with the remaining 54 cases acting as a validation group. RESULTS Large tumour size and the presence of retinal detachment were significant, independent risk factors for developing rubeosis for both the test and validation groups. These factors also predicted subsequent enucleation for uncontrolled ocular pain. Patients with tumours too large to plaque and with an associated retinal detachment had a 90% chance of developing rubeosis within 4 years of proton beam radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a uveal melanoma too large for plaque therapy and an associated retinal detachment run a very high risk of developing rubeosis after proton beam radiotherapy and one third of individuals developing rubeosis required enucleation for pain even if local tumour control was satisfactory.

1 July 2013 in Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Bertil E. DamatoBertil E. Damato
Bertil E. Damato
AKAndrzej Kacperek
Andrzej Kacperek
DEDoug Errington
Doug Errington
HHHeinrich Heimann
Heinrich Heimann
Proton beam radiotherapy of uveal melanoma can be administered as primary treatment, as salvage therapy for recurrent tumor, and as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. The physical properties of proton beams make it possible to deliver high-doses of radiation to the tumor with relative sparing of adjacent tissues. This form of therapy is effective for a wider range of uveal melanoma than any other modality, providing exceptionally-high rates of local tumor control. This is particularly the case with diffuse iris melanomas, many of which are unresectable. The chances of survival, ocular conservation, visual preservation and avoidance of iatrogenic morbidity depend greatly on the tumor size, location and extent. When treating any side-effects and/or complications, it is helpful to consider whether these are the result of collateral damage or persistence of the irradiated tumor ('toxic tumor syndrome').