Kevin Prise

Prof. Kevin Prise

Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 April 2009 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KPKevin Prise
Kevin Prise
JOJoe M. O'Sullivan
Joe M. O'Sullivan

20 June 2012 in Nanoscale
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Karl ButterworthKarl Butterworth
Karl Butterworth
SMStephen J. Mcmahon
Stephen J. Mcmahon
FCFred J. Currell
Fred J. Currell
KPKevin Prise
Kevin Prise
The unique properties of nanomaterials, in particular gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have applications for a wide range of biomedical applications. GNPs have been proposed as novel radiosensitizing agents due to their strong photoelectric absorption coefficient. Experimental evidence supporting the application of GNPs as radiosensitizing agents has been provided from extensive in vitro investigation and a relatively limited number of in vivo studies. Whilst these studies provide experimental evidence for the use of GNPs in combination with ionising radiation, there is an apparent disparity between the observed experimental findings and the level of radiosensitization predicted by mass energy absorption and GNP concentration. This review summarises experimental findings and attempts to highlight potential underlying biological mechanisms of response in GNP radiosensitization.

1 February 2011 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJSuneil Jain
Suneil Jain
JJonathan Coulter
Jonathan Coulter
AHAlan R. Hounsell
Alan R. Hounsell
Karl ButterworthKarl Butterworth
Karl Butterworth
SMStephen J. Mcmahon
Stephen J. Mcmahon
DHDavid G. Hirst
David G. Hirst

3 November 2016 in Cancer Nanotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKaspar Haume
Kaspar Haume
SRSoraia Rosa
Soraia Rosa
SGSophie Grellet
Sophie Grellet
Małgorzata Śmiałek-TelegaMałgorzata Śmiałek-Telega
Małgorzata Śmiałek-Telega
Karl ButterworthKarl Butterworth
Karl Butterworth
NMNigel J. Mason
Nigel J. Mason
Radiotherapy is currently used in around 50% of cancer treatments and relies on the deposition of energy directly into tumour tissue. Although it is generally effective, some of the deposited energy can adversely affect healthy tissue outside the tumour volume, especially in the case of photon radiation (gamma and X-rays). Improved radiotherapy outcomes can be achieved by employing ion beams due to the characteristic energy deposition curve which culminates in a localised, high radiation dose (in form of a Bragg peak). In addition to ion radiotherapy, novel sensitisers, such as nanoparticles, have shown to locally increase the damaging effect of both photon and ion radiation, when both are applied to the tumour area. Amongst the available nanoparticle systems, gold nanoparticles have become particularly popular due to several advantages: biocompatibility, well-established methods for synthesis in a wide range of sizes, and the possibility of coating of their surface with a large number of different molecules to provide partial control of, for example, surface charge or interaction with serum proteins. This gives a full range of options for design parameter combinations, in which the optimal choice is not always clear, partially due to a lack of understanding of many processes that take place upon irradiation of such complicated systems. In this review, we summarise the mechanisms of action of radiation therapy with photons and ions in the presence and absence of nanoparticles, as well as the influence of some of the core and coating design parameters of nanoparticles on their radiosensitisation capabilities.

20 June 2011 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMStephen J. Mcmahon
Stephen J. Mcmahon
WHWendy B. Hyland
Wendy B. Hyland
MMMark F. Muir
Mark F. Muir
JJonathan Coulter
Jonathan Coulter
SJSuneil Jain
Suneil Jain
FCFred J. Currell
Fred J. Currell
Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are being proposed as contrast agents to enhance X-ray imaging and radiotherapy, seeking to take advantage of the increased X-ray absorption of gold compared to soft tissue. However, there is a great discrepancy between physically predicted increases in X-ray energy deposition and experimentally observed increases in cell killing. In this work, we present the first calculations which take into account the structure of energy deposition in the nanoscale vicinity of GNPs and relate this to biological outcomes, and show for the first time good agreement with experimentally observed cell killing by the combination of X-rays and GNPs. These results are not only relevant to radiotherapy, but also have implications for applications of heavy atom nanoparticles in biological settings or where human exposure is possible because the localised energy deposition high-lighted by these results may cause complex DNA damage, leading to mutation and carcinogenesis.

1 July 2005 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKevin Prise
Kevin Prise
GSGiuseppe Schettino
Giuseppe Schettino
MFMelvyn Folkard
Melvyn Folkard
KHKathryn D Held
Kathryn D Held