Barbara Tóth

Dr. Barbara Tóth

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in Phytomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBarbara Tóth
Barbara Tóth
Tamás LantosTamás Lantos
Tamás Lantos
PHPéter Hegyi
Péter Hegyi
RVRéka Viola
Réka Viola
AVAndrea Vasas
Andrea Vasas
Dezső CsuporDezső Csupor
Dezső Csupor

28 September 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dorottya KonczDorottya Koncz
Dorottya Koncz
BTBarbara Tóth
Barbara Tóth
MBMuh. Akbar Bahar
Muh. Akbar Bahar
OROrsolya Roza
Orsolya Roza
Dezső CsuporDezső Csupor
Dezső Csupor
Synephrine has been used to promote weight loss; however, its safety and efficacy have not been fully established. The goals of our study were to give an overview of the safety and efficacy of p-synephrine, to systematically evaluate its efficacy regarding weight loss and to assess its safety, focusing on its cardiovascular side effects in a meta-analysis. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant studies. Only placebo-controlled, human clinical trials with synephrine intervention were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines using the PICOS format and taking into account the CONSORT recommendations. Altogether, 18 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increased significantly after prolonged use (6.37 mmHg, 95% CI: 1.02–11.72, p = 0.02 and 4.33 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.48–8.18, p = 0.03, respectively). The weight loss in the synephrine group was non-significant after prolonged treatment, and it did not influence body composition parameters. Based on the analyzed clinical studies, synephrine tends to raise blood pressure and heart rate, and there is no evidence that synephrine can facilitate weight loss. Further studies are needed to confirm evidence of its safety and efficacy.

4 August 2020 in Current Pharmaceutical Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKBeáta Kerémi
Beáta Kerémi
KMKatalin Márta
Katalin Márta
KFKornélia Farkas
Kornélia Farkas
LCLászló Márk Czumbel
László Márk Czumbel
BTBarbara Tóth
Barbara Tóth
GVGábor Varga
Gábor Varga
Background: Effective and selective oral rinses are required in the daily medical and dental practice. Currently mouthwashes used have substantial side effects. Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of chlorine dioxide-containing mouthwashes in comparison with other previously established mouth rinses in healthy adults using oral hygiene indices. Methods: This work was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018099059) and carried out using multiple databases and reported according to the PRISMA statement. The search terms used were “chlorine dioxide” AND “oral”, and only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The primary outcome was the alteration of the plaque index (PI), while the secondary outcomes were the gingival index (GI) and bacterial counts. For the risk of bias assessment, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used. Statistical analysis for data heterogeneity was performed by Q-value and I2-tests. Results: 364 articles were found in the databases. After the selection process, only five RCTs were eligible for meta-analysis. Data heterogeneity was low. There were no statistical differences in effectiveness between chlorine dioxide and other effective mouth rinses in PI (0.720±0.119 vs 0.745±0.131; 95%; confidence intervals (CIs): 0.487-0.952 vs 0.489-1.001, respectively) and GI (0.712±0.130 vs 0.745±0.131; 95% CIs: 0.457–0.967 vs 0.489– 1.001, respectively) and also in bacterial counts. Conclusion: Chlorine dioxide reduces both plaque and gingival indices and bacterial counts in the oral cavity similar to other routinely used oral rinses, however, the evidence supporting this outcome is very limited. Therefore, further large scale RCTs are needed to decrease the risk of bias.

1 May 2019 in Phytomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKChing-Ying Kuo
Ching-Ying Kuo
Zsuzsanna SchelzZsuzsanna Schelz
Zsuzsanna Schelz
BTBarbara Tóth
Barbara Tóth
AVAndrea Vasas
Andrea Vasas
IOImre Ocsovszki
Imre Ocsovszki
HWHui-Chun Wang
Hui-Chun Wang

10 July 2025 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZSZsóka Szikora
Zsóka Szikora
RMRebeka Mátyus
Rebeka Mátyus
BSBettina Vargáné Szabó
Bettina Vargáné Szabó
Dezső CsuporDezső Csupor
Dezső Csupor
BTBarbara Tóth
Barbara Tóth
Background/Objectives: Hypertension affects over 1.3 billion people globally, and inadequate therapy is reported in 80% of cases. Patients increasingly turn to complementary therapies, including hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), a traditional remedy for cardiovascular diseases. Hawthorn has long been used in folk medicine to lower blood pressure; however, its efficacy has not been fully established. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the antihypertensive effects and safety of hawthorn in randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including six studies with a total of 428 participants. The trials focused on systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes over treatment periods of 10 weeks to 6 months. Literature searches were conducted in the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Studies that met the predefined PICO criteria were included. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results: Hawthorn statistically significantly decreased SBP (MD: −6.65 mmHg; 95% CI [−11.72; 1.59]) and non-significantly reduced DBP (MD: −7.19 mmHg; 95% CI [−15.17; 0.79]) after 2–6 months of treatment. Variations in dosage (250–1200 mg/day) and study protocols contributed to this heterogeneity. Conclusions: The effect of hawthorn on blood pressure is clinically significant. However, larger, well-designed trials are needed to establish optimal dosing, duration, and efficacy with greater reliability.

7 March 2023 in GeroScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZRZsuzsanna Ragó
Zsuzsanna Ragó
BTBarbara Tóth
Barbara Tóth
ÁSÁgnes Szalenko-Tőkés
Ágnes Szalenko-Tőkés
ZBZsolt Bella
Zsolt Bella
FDFanni Dembrovszky
Fanni Dembrovszky
Dezső CsuporDezső Csupor
Dezső Csupor
Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug, has been repurposed for COVID-19 treatment during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Although its antiviral efficacy was confirmed early in vitro and in preclinical studies, its clinical efficacy remained ambiguous. Our purpose was to assess the efficacy of ivermectin in terms of time to viral clearance based on the meta-analysis of available clinical trials at the closing date of the data search period, one year after the start of the pandemic. This meta-analysis was reported by following the PRISMA guidelines and by using the PICO format for formulating the question. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Embase, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), bioRvix, and medRvix were searched for human studies of patients receiving ivermectin therapy with control groups. No language or publication status restrictions were applied. The search ended on 1/31/2021 exactly one year after WHO declared the public health emergency on novel coronavirus. The meta-analysis of three trials involving 382 patients revealed that the mean time to viral clearance was 5.74 days shorter in case of ivermectin treatment compared to the control groups [WMD = −5.74, 95% CI (−11.1, −0.39), p = 0.036]. Ivermectin has significantly reduced the time to viral clearance in mild to moderate COVID-19 diseases compared to control groups. However, more eligible studies are needed for analysis to increase the quality of evidence of ivermectin use in COVID-19.