Articles | Czech Journal of Food Sciences | Agricultural Journals

Liposomes have emerged as versatile carriers in the food industry due to their amphiphilic structure, biocompatibility, and ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and lipophilic bioactive compounds. They offer promising benefits by enhancing the solubility and bioavailability of food ingredients such as vitamins, polyphenols, carotenoids, peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids. However, liposomes in aqueous form often suffer from poor stability, leakage of encapsulated compounds, and sensitivity to environmental conditions. To address these challenges, hybrid delivery systems have been developed by incorporating liposomes into various solid or semi-solid encapsulation matrices such as nanofibers, particles, cast films, hydrogels, and emulsions. These combinations can offer synergistic advantages, including improved structural integrity, enhanced protection during processing and storage, extended-release profiles under digestive conditions, and versatile applicability across different applications. This review comprehensively discusses liposome structure, preparation methods, and their incorporation into various encapsulation matrices, focusing exclusively on food-grade ingredients. It highlights recent advancements in hybrid liposome-based systems tailored for food applications, with an emphasis on their functional performance and delivery efficiency. Overall, these hybrid systems hold great promise for developing next-generation functional foods with improved health benefits and shelf stability.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different drying methods on the drying kinetic, total bioactive content, in-vitro bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds, and color and microstructural properties of pomegranate arils. Drying methods significantly affected all selected parameters of dried pomegranate arils (P<0.05). Freeze-drying (FD) showed higher bioactive compounds, lower shrinkage, and better color quality than those of other samples. Ultrasound-assisted vacuum drying (UAVD) showed lower drying times, lower shrinkage, and higher bioactive compounds than vacuum drying (VD) and hot air drying (HAD). The ABTS, CUPRAC, and DPPH results were 34.53-63.71 μmol TE/g, 29.70-61.60 μmol TE/g and 64.82-93.69% DPPH radical scavenging activity, respectively. Also, the highest values of antioxidant capacity for all methods were obtained from the samples dried with FD followed by UAVD, VD, and HAD. The recovery of TPC in dried and fresh samples changed from 2.58% (fresh pomegranate) to 10.32% (vacuum-dried pomegranate). The recovery of TPC for freeze-dried samples (2.62%) was closest to the fresh ones and VD showed the highest TPC recovery. This study suggested that UAVD and VD should be used as alternative methods to HAD due to higher bioactive compounds retention, better color and surface quality, and higher recovery of bioactive compounds.

Background and purpose: Propolis has low water solubility, poor stability, and limited bioaccessibility of phenolic constituents when subjected to in vitro digestion. To overcome these drawbacks, the liposomal encapsulation method can be employed. Experimental approach: Soybean phosphatidylcholine lecithin mixed with Tween 80 (T80) and ammonium phosphatides (AMP) was used to produce propolis extract (PE)-loaded liposomes. The mean particle size, zeta potential, encapsulation efficiency values, and transmission electron microscopy analysis were used to characterize liposomes. Individual phenolics were determined for digested and nondigested propolis-loaded liposomes and propolis extract. Key results: Tween 80 incorporation reduced the size of unloaded liposomes, whereas AMP inclusion yielded larger liposomes. In both formulations, PE loading significantly increased the size and reduced the zeta potential values and homogeneity of the size distribution. In free PE, the most bioaccessible polyphenols were phenolic acids (3.20 to 5.63 %), and flavonoids such as caffeic acid phenethyl ester, galangin, pinobanksin, and pinocembrin (0.03 to 2.12 %) were the least bioaccessible. Both liposomal propolis provided significantly higher bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds. The liposomes with T80 and AMP in their compositions recovered 52.43 and 185.90 % of the total amount of phenolic compounds in the nondigested samples, respectively. The liposomes containing AMP not only exhibited high solubility for PE but also provided protection to the phenolic compounds during in vitro digestion. Conclusion: Liposomal encapsulation could be a promising approach to improving the solubility and stability of PE in digestive fluids, making it suitable for the delivery of propolis in oral formulations.