Surface pretreatment significantly influences the hygroscopic behavior of wood, which in turn affects surface stability when exposed to variable climatic conditions. This study focuses on how different surface pretreatment methods impact the performance of protective coating applied on spruce wood (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) during one year of natural weathering. Samples were prepared using various surface treatments: milling and sanding with grit sizes P40, P80, and P120, respectively. Two types of coatings were applied: a solventborne coating (ADLER Pullex Plus-Lasur) and a waterborne coating (DColor FK 47 UV Protect). The samples were exposed for 12 months at an outdoor testing site in Suchdol, Czech. Surface properties were assessed through color changes in the CIE Lab* space, gloss measurements (ISO 2813), contact angle analysis, and visual inspection. The results showed that exposure to UV radiation and microbial activities led to the gradual degradation of the optical properties and aesthetic appearance of the wood. Surfaces with greater roughness preserved their aesthetic properties more effectively, indicating a higher absorption of the coating. Untreated wood exhibited low water repellency, while the coated surface demonstrated enhanced hydrophobicity. Notably, the waterborne coating showed a temporary increase in contact angle around the sixth month, indicating surface clogging by dust particles. In contrast, the solventborne coating had a rapid decrease in wettability during the first nine months. These findings suggested the importance of surface pretreatment and coating type in maintaining the long-term performance and aesthetic appearance for wood used in exterior conditions.
This study presents a comparative analysis of a “design” speaker cabinet shape and a conventional block enclosure, both having identical internal volumes. Both enclosures were built from birch wood, and for comparison, block-shaped baffles were also made from medium-density fiberboard (MDF). While the designer’s new shape was handcrafted using a lathe, a cube baffle was made using a CNC machine. The block-shaped sound box was made as a representative of the classic shape that occurs most often in the world of music. For this reason, it is offered as an ideal reference sample of the enclosure for comparison with the new design proposal, which was produced based on the shape predispositions and the interest of potential customers. The loudspeaker systems were then subjected to anechoic chamber testing using the exponential sine sweep (ESS) technique to assess and compare their resonance characteristics. The box-shaped enclosure showed a smoother course of the frequency response, but the differences are not significant. A potential improvement in acoustic performance was offered by an acoustic dampening material that was incorporated into each enclosure, and the measurement was repeated. The drop shape from solid birch benefits most from filling, with an 8 dB reduction in low-end boom and 2 dB smoothing, resulting in more controlled bass. The cuboid of solid birch is quite stable even without filling, but filling still improves deep bass by ~3 dB and smooths mid-bass by ~2 dB. For comparison, the cuboid made of MDF shows the largest improvement with filling, with a 10 dB reduction in sub-bass peaks and 4 dB smoothing in dips. With the acoustic filling, the frequency curves are even more smoothed, and it can be said that the damping material can eliminate some of the imperfections of the enclosures.
This study presents a comparative analysis of a "design" speaker cabinet shape and a conventional block enclosure, both having identical internal volumes. Both enclosures were built from birch wood, and for comparison, block-shaped baffles were also made from medium-density fiberboard (MDF). While the designer's new shape was hand-crafted using a lathe and a cube baffle on a CNC machine. The block-shaped sound box was made as a representative of the classic shape that occurs most often in the world of music. For this reason, it is offered as an ideal reference sample of the enclosure for comparison with the new design proposal, which was produced based on the shape predispositions and the interest of potential customers. The loudspeaker systems were then subjected to anechoic chamber testing using the sine sweep technique to assess and compare their resonance characteristics. The box-shaped enclosure showed a smoother course of the frequency response, but the differences are not significant. A potential improvement in acoustic performance was offered by acoustic dampening material that was incorporated into each enclosure, and the measurement was repeated. With the acoustic filling, the frequency curves are even more smoothed, and it can be said that the damping material can eliminate some of the imperfections of the enclosures.