Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is increasingly used as a marine fuel due to its capacity to significantly reduce emissions of particulate matter, sulfur oxides (SO_x), and nitrogen oxides (NO_x), compared to conventional fuels. In addition, LNG combustion produces less carbon dioxide (CO₂) than conventional marine fuels, and the use of non-fossil LNG offers further potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, this benefit can be partially offset by methane slip—the release of unburned methane in engine exhaust—which has a much higher global warming potential than CO₂. This study presents an experimental evaluation of methane emissions from a RoPax vessel powered by low-pressure dual-fuel four-stroke engines with a direct mechanical propulsion system. Methane slip was measured directly during onboard testing and combined with a year-long analysis of engine operation using an Engine Load Monitoring (ELM) method. The yearly average methane slip coefficient (C_slip) obtained was 1.57%, slightly lower than values reported in previous studies on cruise ships (1.7%), and significantly lower than the default values specified by the FuelEU (3.1%) Maritime regulation and IMO (3.5%) LCA guidelines. This result reflects the ship’s operational profile, characterized by long crossings at high and stable engine loads. This study provides results that could support more representative emission assessments and can contribute to ongoing regulatory discussions.

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is increasingly used in maritime propulsion systems as a means to reduce atmospheric emissions. However, methane slip from dual-fuel engines remains a critical limitation due to the high global warming potential of methane. This study presents a comprehensive experimental assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a new-generation four-stroke dual-fuel engine installed on a cruise vessel and operating on both LNG and marine gas oil (MGO). Measurements were carried out during full-scale sea trials under real navigation conditions. Results show that methane slip remains strongly dependent on engine load, with low and stable values at medium-to-high loads (1.95 g/kWh average over the 60–90% range) and a significant increase at low load. Compared with a previous engine generation (46DF), the 46TS-DF engine exhibits an approximate 18% reduction in methane slip above 60% load. On a well-to-wake basis, this results in an overall CO₂-equivalent emission reduction of about 6%, of which 42% is attributable to methane slip reduction and the remainder to improved energy efficiency. In contrast, switching from LNG to MGO operation leads to a 23.5% increase in CO₂-equivalent emissions. Black carbon (BC) emissions were measured and as expected despite the limited number of available studies, they were found to be significantly lower in LNG mode, with reductions exceeding 90% compared with MGO operation. Finally, an Engine Load Monitoring (ELM) analysis based on one year of operational data highlights the strong influence of vessel operating profiles on methane slip. The application of both IMO and FuelEU methodologies yields consistent methane slip coefficients (1.34% and 1.36%, respectively), significantly lower than current default values, noting that these estimates do not include crankcase emissions. These results demonstrate the importance of integrating real operational conditions into emission assessment frameworks for LNG-fuelled vessels.

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is increasingly used in maritime propulsion systems to reduce atmospheric emissions. However, methane slip from dual-fuel engines remains a critical limitation due to the high global warming potential of methane. This study presents a comprehensive experimental assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a new-generation low-pressure four-stroke dual-fuel (LPDF 4-S) engine installed on a cruise vessel and operating on both LNG and marine gas oil (MGO). Measurements were carried out during full-scale sea trials under real navigation conditions. Results show that methane slip remains strongly dependent on engine load, with low and stable values at medium-to-high loads (1.95 g·kWh⁻¹ average over the 60–90% range) and a value of 5.6 g·kWh⁻¹ at 26% engine load. Compared with the previous engine generation (46DF), the 46TS-DF engine exhibits an approximate 18% reduction in methane slip above 60% load. On a well-to-wake basis, this results in an overall carbon dioxide CO₂-equivalent emission reduction of about 6%, of which 42% is attributable to methane slip reduction and the remainder to improved energy efficiency. In contrast, switching from MGO to LNG operation leads to a 21% decrease in CO₂-equivalent emissions. Black carbon (BC) emissions were measured and as expected despite the limited number of available studies, they were found to be significantly lower in LNG mode, with reductions exceeding 90% compared with MGO operation. Finally, an Engine Load Monitoring (ELM) analysis based on one year of operational data highlights the strong influence of vessel operating profiles on methane slip. The application of both International Maritime Organization (IMO) and FuelEU Maritime methodologies yields consistent methane slip coefficients (1.34% and 1.36%, respectively), significantly lower than current default values, noting that these estimates do not include crankcase emissions. These results demonstrate the importance of integrating real operational conditions into emission assessment frameworks for LNG-fuelled vessels.