Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of awareness among dental students and practitioners regarding the utilization of endocrowns in clinical settings, along with any differences in knowledge based on gender, educational level, and workplace. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey-based study was conducted, including 1154 participants from various dental institutions across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire included demographic data and closed-ended questions focused on knowledge and awareness of endocrowns. Data was analyzed using statistical tests, including chi-square, to see any significant differences. Results: Most participants (81%) had knowledge about endocrowns, mainly from their colleagues. Knowledge levels and preferences (like the use of lithium disilicate and adhesive resin cement) differed based on gender, educational level, and workplace. Male participants and undergraduates showed better awareness in some areas. Faculty members mostly depend on college training, while private practitioners obtain most of their information from workshops. Conclusions: Males showed significant superiority in knowledge about endocrown usage. Colleges were the most prevalent source of information regarding endocrown restorations. Significant molar tooth loss and restricted inter-arch space were the most common reasons for utilizing endocrowns. Moreover, endocrowns were considered a viable alternative to traditional post and core.
The median maxillary labial frenum (MMLF) is an anatomical structure composed of mucous membrane and connective tissue within the oral cavity. It serves as a key component of the septo‐premaxillary traction system, extending from the nasal septum to the mucosal aspect of the lip and from the midline of the lip anteriorly to the median interincisal suture. The frenum exhibits dynamic and variable morphology, with its shape, size, and position changing throughout various stages of growth and development. A 20‐year‐old Saudi male presented to the King Faisal University Dental Complex Clinics. The patient′s medical, dental, and family histories were unremarkable, with no syndromic conditions reported among family members. Both extraoral and intraoral examinations were within normal limits, except for the presence of a simple triple labial frenum. Direct visual inspection was performed to evaluate the frenum′s form, size, and point of attachment. Blanching or tension was assessed by gently drawing the upper lip outward and upward. The simple triple frenum type of MMLF is a rare anatomical variation, with a reported prevalence ranging from 1.0% to 1.57%. The frenum is classified as pathogenic when associated with midline diastema, gingival recession, loss of papilla, interdental bone loss, reduced lip mobility, difficulty with oral hygiene, and malalignment of teeth. Pathogenic frena may also present with a flattened papilla closely attached to the gingival margin, insufficiently attached gingiva, and a shallow vestibule. Emphasizing frenum assessment during oral examinations is essential to prevent misdiagnosis of normal anatomical variations as pathological findings. Accurate identification supports appropriate intervention and effective treatment planning.