Background and Purpose—: Endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils lowers the risk of major recurrence, but technical limitations (coil stiffness and time restriction for placement) have prevented their wider clinical use. We aimed to assess the efficacy of softer, second-generation hydrogel coils. Methods—: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at 22 centers in France and Germany. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with untreated ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms measuring 4 to 12 mm in diameter were eligible and randomized (1:1 using a web-based system, stratified by rupture status) to coiling with either second-generation hydrogel coils or bare platinum coils. Assist devices were allowed as clinically required. Independent imaging core laboratory was masked to allocation. Primary end point was a composite outcome measure including major aneurysm recurrence, aneurysm retreatment, morbidity that prevented angiographic controls, and any death during treatment and follow-up. Data were analyzed as randomized. Results—: Randomization began on October 15, 2009, and stopped on January 31, 2014, after 513 patients (hydrogel, n=256; bare platinum, n=257); 20 patients were excluded for missing informed consent and 9 for treatment-related criteria. Four hundred eighty-four patients (hydrogel, n=243; bare platinum, n=241) were included in the analysis; 208 (43%) were treated for ruptured aneurysms. Final end point data were available for 456 patients. Forty-five out of 226 (19.9%) patients in the hydrogel group and 66/230 (28.7%) in the control group had an unfavorable composite primary outcome, giving a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of an unfavorable composite primary outcome with hydrogel coils—adjusted for rupture status—of 8.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.5–16.2; P =0.036). Adverse and serious adverse events were evenly distributed between groups. Conclusions—: Our results suggest that endovascular coil embolization with second-generation hydrogel coils may reduce the rate of unfavorable outcome events in patients with small- and medium-sized intracranial aneurysms. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/ . Unique identifier: DRKS00003132.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters for the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms remain controversial. We aimed to identify factors contributing to outcome measures in patients treated with the Surpass flow diverter for aneurysms in this location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 53 patients who underwent flow-diverter treatment for posterior circulation aneurysms at 15 centers. Key outcome measures were mortality, complete aneurysm occlusion, and modified Rankin Scale score at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up (median, 11.3 months; interquartile range, 5.9–12.7 months), 9 patients had died, resulting in an all-cause mortality rate of 17.3% (95% CI, 7%–27.6%); 7 deaths (14%) were directly related to the procedure and none occurred in patients with a baseline mRS score of zero. After adjusting for covariates, a baseline mRS of 3–5 was more significantly (P = .003) associated with a higher hazard ratio for death than a baseline mRS of 0–2 (hazard ratio, 17.11; 95% CI, 2.69–109.02). After adjusting for follow-up duration, a 1-point increase in the baseline mRS was significantly (P < .001) associated with higher values of mRS at follow-up (odds ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.79–4.79). Follow-up angiography in 44 patients (median, 11.3 months; interquartile range, 5.9–12.7 months) showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 29 (66%; 95% CI, 50.1%–79.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical results of flow-diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms depend very much on patient selection. In this study, poorer outcomes were related to the treatment of aneurysms in patients with higher baseline mRS scores. Angiographic results showed a high occlusion rate for this subset of complex aneurysms.

Background Flow diverters (FD) are used regularly for the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Derivo embolization device (DED) with respect to long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes. Methods A prospective multicenter trial was conducted at 12 centers. Patients presenting with modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0–1, treated for unruptured intracranial aneurysms with DED were eligible. Primary endpoint was the mRS assessed at 18 months with major morbidity defined as mRS 3–5. Satisfactory angiographic occlusion was defined as 3+4 on the Kamran scale. Results Between July 2014 and February 2018, 119 patients were enrolled. Twenty-three patients were excluded. Ninety-six patients, 71 (74%) female, mean age 54±12.0 years, were included in the analysis. Mean aneurysm size was 14.2±16.9 mm. The mean number of devices implanted per patient was 1.2 (range 1–3). Clinical follow-up at 18 months was available in 90 (94%) patients, resulting in a mean follow-up period of 14.8±5.2 months. At last available follow-up of 96 enrolled patients, 91 (95%) remained mRS 0–1. The major morbidity rate (mRS 3–5) was 3.1% (3/96), major stroke rate was 4.2% (4/96), and mortality was 0%. Follow-up angiographies were available in 89 (93%) patients at a median of 12.4±5.84 months with a core laboratory adjudicated satisfactory aneurysm occlusion in 89% (79/89). Conclusion Our results suggest that DED is a safe and effective treatment for unruptured aneurysms with high rates of satisfactory occlusion and comparably low rates of permanent neurological morbidity and mortality. Trial registration DRKS00006103

Background Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing (NICE) lesions have been reported as a rare complication of various neuroendovascular procedures, but information on their incidence after flow diversion is scant. It is unclear if specific devices or novel coating technologies may impact their occurrence. Methods We conducted a multicenter study on the incidence of NICE lesions after flow diverter (FD) implantation for cerebral aneurysm treatment. Results Eight centers identified 15 patients and provided detailed data. The clinical presentation ranged from asymptomatic to hemiplegia and cognitive impairment. The mean time to diagnosis after treatment was 65.1±101.5 days. Five centers disclosed information on all of their 1201 FD procedures during the inclusion period (2015–2022), during which 12 patients were diagnosed with NICE lesions in these institutions—that is, an incidence of 1%. FD coatings did not increase the incidence (6/591 patients (1%) treated with surface-modified FD vs 6/610 patients (1%) treated with bare FD; P=1.00). Significantly increased rates of 3.7% (6 cases in 161 procedures; P<0.01) and 3.3% (5 cases in 153 procedures; P<0.01) were found with stents of two specific product lines. The use of one product line was associated with a significantly lower incidence (0 cases in 499 procedures (0%); P<0.01). Conclusions Novel stent coatings are not associated with an increased incidence of NICE lesions. The incidence rate of 1% suggests that these lesions may occur more often after flow diversion than after other endovascular treatments. We found a concerning accumulation of NICE lesion cases when FDs from two product families were used.