(1) Background: Long COVID syndrome refers to long-term sequelae of the novel viral disease, which occur even in patients with initially mild disease courses. However, there is still little evidence of the actual organic consequences and their frequency, and there is no standardized workup to diagnose long COVID syndrome yet. In this study, we aim to determine the efficiency of a stepwise diagnostic approach for reconvalescent COVID-19 patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms. (2) Methods: The diagnostic workup for long COVID syndrome included three steps. In the first step, the focus was on broad applicability (e.g., blood tests and body plethysmography). In the second step, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and cardiac MRI (CMR) were used. The third step was tailored to the individual needs of each patient. The observation period lasted from 22 February to 14 May 2021. (3) Results: We examined 231 patients in our long COVID unit (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [14.9], 132 [57.1%] women). Acute illness occurred a mean (SD) of 121 (77) days previously. Suspicious findings in the first visit were seen in 80 (34.6%) patients, prompting further diagnostics. Thirty-six patients were further examined with CPET and CMR. Of those, 16 (44.4%) had pathological findings. The rest had functional complaints without organ damage (“functional long COVID”). Cardiopulmonary sequelae were found in asymptomatic as well as severe courses of the initial COVID-19 disease. (4) Conclusions: A structured diagnostic pathway for the diagnosis of long COVID syndrome is practicable and rational in terms of resource allocation. With this approach, manifest organ damage can be accurately and comprehensively diagnosed and distinguished from functional complaints.

Background: Data on the relation between non-emergency and emergency cardiac admission rates during the COVID-19 lockdown and post-lockdown period are sparse. Methods: Consecutive cardiac patients admitted to our tertiary heart center between 1 January and 30 June 2020 were included. The observation period of 6 months was analyzed in total and divided into three defined time periods: the pre-lockdown (1 January–19 March), lockdown (20 March–19 April), and post-lockdown (20 April–30 June) period. These were compared to the reference periods 2019 and 2022 using daily admission rates and incidence rate ratios (IRR). Results: Over the observation period from 1 January to 30 June, cardiac admissions (including non-emergency and emergency) were comparable between 2019, 2020, and 2022 (n = 2889, n = 2952, n = 2956; p = 0.845). However, when compared to the reference period 2019, non-emergency admissions decreased in 2020 (1364 vs. 1663; p = 0.02), while emergency admissions significantly increased (1588 vs. 1226; p < 0.001). Further analysis of the lockdown period revealed that non-emergency admissions dropped by 82% (IRR 0.18; 95%-CI 0.14–0.24; p < 0.001) and 42% fewer invasive cardiac interventions were performed (p < 0.001), whereas the post-lockdown period showed a 52% increase of emergency admissions (IRR 1.47; 95%-CI 1.31–1.65; p < 0.001) compared to 2019. Conclusions: We demonstrate a drastic surge of emergency cardiac admissions post-COVID-19 related lockdown suggesting that patients who did not keep their non-emergency appointment had to be admitted as an emergency later on.

Background/Objectives: Timely diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) remains a significant challenge, and IE poses significant morbidity and mortality. Modified Duke criteria (MDC) are used for the clinical evaluation and diagnosis of IE, but their current use is dichotomous. There are no studies that associate the amount of positive MDC with the patient’s outcome. This study intends to analyze whether the amount of MDC on initial presentation can be used for prognostic assumptions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective data analysis on patients with confirmed and suspected IE who were treated at the Department of Internal Medicine II at Ulm University Heart Center from December 2009 to December 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to find correlations between 90-day mortality and the number of MDC. Results: 130 patients with confirmed IE were included in the analysis. Less minor MDC (OR 1.718; 95%-CI 1.096–3.268; p = 0.022) and a history of coronary artery disease (OR 4.711; 95%-CI 1.791–12.393; p = 0.002) were independently associated with higher 90-day mortality in patients with ultimately confirmed IE. Fewer minor MDC on presentation were associated with later diagnosis (b 2.341; 95%-CI 0.312–4.370; p = 0.024) and antibiotic therapy (b 2.953; 95%-CI 0.82–5.084; p = 0.007) for IE. Conclusions: Early diagnosis of IE is essential for favorable outcomes. Fewer minor MDC on initial presentation may lead to delayed diagnosis, antibiosis, and worse outcomes.

Background: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) augments coronary perfusion during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We sought to identify patients who benefited from prophylactic IABP (P-IABP) compared to rescue-IABP (R-IABP). Methods: All consecutive non-cardiogenic shock patients undergoing high-risk PCI with IABP support at Ulm University Hospital, Germany, between 2012 and 2020 were grouped based on the timing of IABP insertion in the pre-interventional P-IABP or peri-interventional R-IABP group. We compared the primary endpoint peri-interventional high-sensitivity Troponin T (hsTnT) increase, sought baseline characteristics associated with the endpoint in the R-IABP group, and compared their correlation strengths between the groups. Results: Interventional outcomes of 44 patients with P-IABP implantation were compared with those of 15 patients with R-IABP implantation. P-IABP was associated with a lower peri-interventional hsTnT increase (p = 0.008, r = 0.390). In the R-IABP group, the presence of ST-segment elevation (p = 0.037, r = 0.631), low systolic blood pressure (RRsyst) (p = 0.007, r = 0.893 (inverse correlation)), and elevated NT-proBNP levels (p < 0.001, r = 0.953) were associated with higher hsTnT increases. HsTnT increase was significantly smaller in the P-IABP group in patients with low RRsyst (IZI = 2.6) and high NT-proBNP levels (IZI = 3.36). Patients with RRsyst < 120 mmHg (p = 0.007) and NT-proBNP levels ≥ 900 pg/mL (Cohen’s d = 0.70, respectively 1.17 for ≥5000 pg/mL and 5.01 for ≥10,000 pg/mL) showed lower peri-interventional hsTnT increase when treated with P-IABP compared to R-IABP, while patients with NT-proBNP levels < 900 pg/mL showed a contrary effect (Cohen’s d = −0.90). Cox regression analysis showed that a high peri-interventional hsTnT increase was significantly associated with a shorter survival time (p = 0.046). Conclusions: P-IABP use in high-risk PCI was associated with reduced peri-interventional myocardial injury, as measured by lower hsTnT increase, which was associated with improved survival in patients with low systolic blood pressure and elevated NT-proBNP levels. Thus, these conditions should be considered for indicating P-IABP.