The interaction between biochar and soil changes nitrogen (N) dynamics in different ecosystems. Although multiple studies have reported influences of biochar on soil inorganic N (SIN) including ammonium (NH4+-N) and nitrate (NO3−-N), the influences reported are contradictory. We undertook a meta-analysis to investigate how biochar properties and the interaction among biochar, soil and fertilisation affect SIN. This quantitative analysis used 56 studies with 1080 experimental cases from manuscripts published between 2010 and 2015. Overall, we found that biochar reduced SIN regardless of experimental conditions (approximately − 11 ± 2% of NH4+-N and − 10 ± 1.6% of NO3−-N); however, 95% of cases were observed within one year after biochar application. SIN was best explained by residence time of biochar in soil, pyrolysis temperature, application rate, fertiliser type, and soil pH. The effects of biochar were complex due to the interaction of biochar with environmental factors. Most biochar trials used wood as a feedstock, but woody biochar did not decrease SIN as much as other plant-derived biochars. When biochar was used with NH4-based fertilisers, SIN decreased compared to biochar with no fertiliser. In contrast, adding organic fertiliser with biochar increased SIN compared to biochar alone. SIN was clearly reduced after one month of biochar application, suggesting that biochar should be applied at least one month prior to planting so plants are not affected by decreased N. Our results revealed that the interactions between biochar and environmental factors, pyrolysis temperature of biochar and biochar surface properties are the main driving factors affecting SIN. There were limited long-term studies of > 1 year, thus the long-term effects of biochar on SIN still remain unclear.Associated Grant:Seed Funding from University of the Sunshine Coast and Griffith University;Associated Grant Code:USC/CRN2012/03 & (EFC-JR

Biochar application to soils may increase carbon (C) sequestration due to the inputs of recalcitrant organic C. However, the effects of biochar application on the soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes appear variable among many case studies; therefore, the efficacy of biochar as a carbon sequestration agent for climate change mitigation remains uncertain. We performed a meta‐analysis of 91 published papers with 552 paired comparisons to obtain a central tendency of three main GHG fluxes (i.e., CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O) in response to biochar application. Our results showed that biochar application significantly increased soil CO₂ fluxes by 22.14%, but decreased N₂O fluxes by 30.92% and did not affect CH₄ fluxes. As a consequence, biochar application may significantly contribute to an increased global warming potential (GWP) of total soil GHG fluxes due to the large stimulation of CO₂ fluxes. However, soil CO₂ fluxes were suppressed when biochar was added to fertilized soils, indicating that biochar application is unlikely to stimulate CO₂ fluxes in the agriculture sector, in which N fertilizer inputs are common. Responses of soil GHG fluxes mainly varied with biochar feedstock source and soil texture and the pyrolysis temperature of biochar. Soil and biochar pH, biochar applied rate, and latitude also influence soil GHG fluxes, but to a more limited extent. Our findings provide a scientific basis for developing more rational strategies toward widespread adoption of biochar as a soil amendment for climate change mitigation.

The Three Gorges Project has been subject to intense debates regarding its benefits and costs. The environmental impacts of this huge project have been an important focus of these debates since the project planning stage. After the operation of the Three Gorges Dam at full capacity at the end of 2008, new environmental and ecological issues are emerging. This paper gives a brief description of the Three Gorges Project and its environmental impact assessment process, as well as major efforts to control environmental problems brought about by the project. From the long and complicated evaluation process, it is clear that there are large uncertainties and competing opinions regarding the benefits and costs, especially the ecological and environmental ones, of the project even after great research effort. Emphasis here is given to the environmental challenges including: (1) water quality control; (2) water and sediment regulation; (3) biodiversity conservation in the riparian and aquatic ecosystems; (4) environmentally friendly dam operation and regional sustainable development. Opportunities often grow out of the challenges. The Three Gorges Project provides opportunities for grand-scale experiments on the environmental, ecological, and socio-economic impacts of large dams. Local, national, and international concerted efforts and concrete actions should be directed to the mitigation and control of the negative impacts as well as securing the positive contributions of the project across scales.