Copy number variation (CNV) has played an important role in studies of susceptibility or resistance to complex diseases. Traditional methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) suffer from low resolution of genomic regions. Following the emergence of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, CNV detection methods based on the short read data have recently been developed. However, due to the relatively young age of the procedures, their performance is not fully understood. To help investigators choose suitable methods to detect CNVs, comparative studies are needed. We compared six publicly available CNV detection methods: CNV-seq, FREEC, readDepth, CNVnator, SegSeq and event-wise testing (EWT). They are evaluated both on simulated and real data with different experiment settings. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is employed to demonstrate the detection performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity, box plot is employed to compare their performances in terms of breakpoint and copy number estimation, Venn diagram is employed to show the consistency among these methods, and F-score is employed to show the overlapping quality of detected CNVs. The computational demands are also studied. The results of our work provide a comprehensive evaluation on the performances of the selected CNV detection methods, which will help biological investigators choose the best possible method.

Recently, a hypergraph constructed from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was utilized to explore brain functional connectivity networks (FCNs) for the classification of neurodegenerative diseases. Each edge of a hypergraph (called hyperedge) can connect any number of brain regions-of-interest (ROIs) instead of only two ROIs, and thus characterizes high-order relations among multiple ROIs that cannot be uncovered by a simple graph in the traditional graph based FCN construction methods. Unlike the existing hypergraph based methods where all hyperedges are assumed to have equal weights and only certain topological features are extracted from the hypergraphs, we propose a hypergraph learning based method for FCN construction in this paper. Specifically, we first generate hyperedges from fMRI time series based on sparse representation, then employ hypergraph learning to adaptively learn hyperedge weights, and finally define a hypergraph similarity matrix to represent the FCN. In our proposed method, weighting hyperedges results in better discriminative FCNs across subjects, and the defined hypergraph similarity matrix can better reveal the overall structure of brain network than using those hypergraph topological features. Moreover, we propose a multi-hypergraph learning based method by integrating multi-paradigm fMRI data, where the hyperedge weights associated with each fMRI paradigm are jointly learned and then a unified hypergraph similarity matrix is computed to represent the FCN. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed method on the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort dataset for the classification of individuals' learning ability from three paradigms of fMRI data. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms the traditional graph based methods (i.e., Pearson's correlation and partial correlation with the graphical Lasso) and the existing unweighted hypergraph based methods, which sheds light on how to optimize estimation of FCNs for cognitive and behavioral study.

Background: The emergence of high-throughput genomic datasets from different sources and platforms (e.g., gene expression, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), and copy number variation (CNV)) has greatly enhanced our understandings of the interplay of these genomic factors as well as their influences on the complex diseases. It is challenging to explore the relationship between these different types of genomic data sets. In this paper, we focus on a multivariate statistical method, canonical correlation analysis (CCA) method for this problem. Conventional CCA method does not work effectively if the number of data samples is significantly less than that of biomarkers, which is a typical case for genomic data (e.g., SNPs). Sparse CCA (sCCA) methods were introduced to overcome such difficulty, mostly using penalizations with l-1 norm (CCA-l1) or the combination of l-1and l-2 norm (CCA-elastic net). However, they overlook the structural or group effect within genomic data in the analysis, which often exist and are important (e.g., SNPs spanning a gene interact and work together as a group). Results: We propose a new group sparse CCA method (CCA-sparse group) along with an effective numerical algorithm to study the mutual relationship between two different types of genomic data (i.e., SNP and gene expression). We then extend the model to a more general formulation that can include the existing sCCA models. We apply the model to feature/variable selection from two data sets and compare our group sparse CCA method with existing sCCA methods on both simulation and two real datasets (human gliomas data and NCI60 data). We use a graphical representation of the samples with a pair of canonical variates to demonstrate the discriminating characteristic of the selected features. Pathway analysis is further performed for biological interpretation of those features. Conclusions: The CCA-sparse group method incorporates group effects of features into the correlation analysis while performs individual feature selection simultaneously. It outperforms the two sCCA methods (CCA-l1 and CCA-group) by identifying the correlated features with more true positives while controlling total discordance at a lower level on the simulated data, even if the group effect does not exist or there are irrelevant features grouped with true correlated features. Compared with our proposed CCA-group sparse models, CCA-l1 tends to select less true correlated features while CCA-group inclines to select more redundant features.

The context-based convolutional neural network (CNN) is one of the most well-known CNNs to improve the performance of semantic segmentation. It has achieved remarkable success in various medical image segmentation tasks. However, extracting rich and useful context information from complex and changeable medical images is a challenge for medical image segmentation. In this study, a novel Multi-Receptive-Field CNN (MRFNet) is proposed to tackle this challenge. MRFNet offers the optimal receptive field for each subnet in the encoder-decoder module (EDM) and generates multi-receptive-field context information at the feature map level. Moreover, MRFNet fuses these multi-feature maps by the concatenation operation. MRFNet is evaluated on 3 public medical image data sets, including SISS, 3DIRCADb, and SPES. Experimental results show that MRFNet achieves the outstanding performance on all 3 data sets, and outperforms other segmentation methods on 3DIRCADb test set without pre-training the model.

Accurate prognosis for cancer patients can provide critical information for optimizing treatment plans and improving life quality. Combining omics data and demographic/clinical information can offer a more comprehensive view of cancer prognosis than using omics or clinical data alone and can also reveal the underlying disease mechanisms at the molecular level. In this study, we developed and validated a deep learning framework to extract information from high-dimensional gene expression and miRNA expression data and conduct prognosis prediction for breast cancer and ovarian-cancer patients using multiple independent multi-omics datasets. Our model achieved significantly better prognosis prediction than the current machine learning and deep learning approaches in various settings. Moreover, an interpretation method was applied to tackle the “black-box” nature of deep neural networks and we identified features (i.e., genes, miRNA, demographic/clinical variables) that were important to distinguish predicted high- and low-risk patients. The significance of the identified features was partially supported by previous studies.