The accumulation of end-of-life tires and the rapid increase in demolition activities pose significant environmental and waste-management challenges. The redevelopment of construction materials incorporating this waste is a potentially promising strategy for minimizing environmental impact while promoting the principles of a circular economy. This study investigates the performance of self-compacting concrete (SCC) incorporating up to 20% rubber aggregates (sand and gravel) and 40% recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) for non-structural applications. A series of tests was conducted to assess fresh and hardened properties, including flowability, compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, water absorption, and density. The results indicated that increasing RCA content reduced density and compressive strength, while tensile and flexural strengths were only moderately affected. Response surface methodology (RSM), utilizing a Box–Behnken design, was employed to optimize compressive, tensile, and flexural strength responses. Statistical analysis was used to identify the optimal mix proportions, which balance the mechanical performance and sustainability of SCC with recycled components. Mixtures incorporating moderate rubber content—specifically, 5–5.5% sand rubber and 0–6% coarse rubber—and 40% recycled-concrete aggregate (RCA) achieved the highest predicted performance, with compressive strength ranging from 20.00 to 28.26 MPa, tensile strength from 2.16 to 2.85 MPa, and flexural strength reaching 5.81 MPa, making them suitable for sidewalks and walkways. Conversely, mixtures containing higher rubber proportions (5.5–20% sand rubber and 20% coarse rubber) combined with the same RCA level (40%) showed the lowest mechanical performance, with compressive strength between 5.2 and 10.08 MPa, tensile strength of 1.05–1.41 MPa, and flexural strength from 2.18 to 3.54 MPa. These findings underscore the broad performance range achievable through targeted optimization. They confirm the viability of recycled materials for producing environmentally friendly SCC in non-structural applications.

’This study investigates the mechanical performance of concrete reinforced with recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers obtained from discarded plastic bottles, aiming to promote sustainable waste reuse in construction materials. Previous studies on PET fiber reinforced concrete have mainly examined the influence of fiber length and content separately, without considering their combined effects on mechanical properties. In this work, the interactions between fiber length, volume fraction, and mechanical behavior were systematically analyzed using a Central Composite Design (CCD) within the framework of Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Concrete incorporating recycled PET fibers was evaluated at three volume fractions (0.3%, 0.8%, and 1.3%) and three lengths (20 mm, 40 mm, and 60 mm), while maintaining a constant water-to-cement ratio. Sixty specimens were tested to assess both fresh and hardened properties. The greatest loss of workability occurred for the mix containing 1.3% fibers with a length of 60 mm, corresponding to about a 25% reduction compared with the control. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) based on a Central Composite Design (CCD) identified 0.3% fiber content and 40 mm length as the optimal combination, representing the mix that simultaneously maximized both compressive (26 MPa) and tensile strengths (3 MPa) according to the predictive model.

This paper presents the results of a study that aimed to analyze the flexural behavior of self-compacting rubberized steel-reinforced concrete. A four-point bending test was performed on three reinforced beams made with conventional concrete and three similar beams made using the same concrete mixture with a 10% volumetric substitution of natural aggregates with rubber particles. The results showed a statistically significant decrease (about 24%) in the cracking load for the rubberized concrete beams, which is attributed to the reduced indirect tensile strength and modulus of the rubberized concrete. However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the control and rubberized concrete beams in terms of ultimate load and maximum deflection Additionally, the estimated adhesion strength, based on the average measured crack spacing, was also statistically similar between the tested beams. Existing equations derived from reinforced concrete beam theory were deemed suitable for rubberized concrete, since the estimation trends for these equations were similar for both types of concrete. Therefore, the main conclusion of this study is that the presence of rubber particles, at a 10% volumetric substitution, did not affect the flexural behavior particularly the quality of adhesion between the reinforcing bars and the surrounding concrete of steel-reinforced beams.