María Marcela Rodríguez

Dr. María Marcela Rodríguez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 September 2012 in Food and Bioprocess Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMaría Marcela Rodríguez
María Marcela Rodríguez
MMM. M.
M. M.
JAJavier Ramiro Arballo
Javier Ramiro Arballo
LCLaura Campanone
Laura Campanone
LAL. A.
L. A.
RMR. H. Mascheroni
R. H. Mascheroni

2 June 2015 in Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMaría Marcela Rodríguez
María Marcela Rodríguez
ARAnabel Rodriguez
Anabel Rodriguez
RMRodolfo H. Mascheroni
Rodolfo H. Mascheroni

27 February 2017 in Drying Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAnabel Rodriguez
Anabel Rodriguez
MRMaría Marcela Rodríguez
María Marcela Rodríguez
MLMaría L. Lemoine
María L. Lemoine
RMRodolfo H. Mascheroni
Rodolfo H. Mascheroni
The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare different drying methods (microwave, hot air + microwave, and osmotic dehydration + microwave) in raspberries (cv. Heritage). A portion of raspberries was pretreated with osmotic dehydration (60°Brix sucrose solution at 20°C for 360 min) and another with hot air drying (HAD) (1.5 m/s air speed at 60°C for 300 min). Pretreated raspberries were then dried by microwave and at three different intensities (3.5, 7.5, and 11 W/g). Physicochemical properties (moisture content, water activity, and drying rate) and quality parameters (optical properties, mechanical properties, antioxidant capacity, and rehydration capacity) of dried raspberries were evaluated. Results showed that the microwave drying (MWD) at 7.5 W/g (50 min and final temperature of 79 ± 5.1°C) allowed a high yield of dried raspberries. The combined processes were not efficient to accelerate the decrease of moisture content, due to the low drying rate of the pretreatments. In terms of quality, none of the drying processes allowed a high retention of the antioxidant capacity. However, they allowed an appropriate rehydration performance. The combination of HAD with MWD allowed obtaining a good appearance and desirable texture on the dried product. Thus, this last option seems to be the best among the drying methods tested, but additional studies are required to improve the efficiency of the process and the effect on the antioxidant capacity during drying.

22 May 2019 in Heat and Mass Transfer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMaría Marcela Rodríguez
María Marcela Rodríguez
SNSusana Nolasco
Susana Nolasco
NINatalia Izquierdo
Natalia Izquierdo
RMRodolfo Mascheroni
Rodolfo Mascheroni
MMMiguel Sanchez Madrigal
Miguel Sanchez Madrigal
Armando Quintero-RamosArmando Quintero-Ramos
Armando Quintero-Ramos

16 September 2017 in International Journal of Food Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMaría Marcela Rodríguez
María Marcela Rodríguez
JAJavier Ramiro Arballo
Javier Ramiro Arballo
LCLaura A. Campañone
Laura A. Campañone
RMRodolfo H. Mascheroni
Rodolfo H. Mascheroni
The objective of this work was to analyze the relevant process conditions on osmotic dehydration of plums and to determine the diffusion coefficients related to this process. The influence of solution (type and concentration of solute, temperature, fruit/solution ratio) and process time on water loss, water content and solutes gain were studied. Process analysis was performed experimentally by means of a set of 16 duplicate tests and numerically by mathematical modeling of the unsteady-state mass transfer phenomena. Experiments were carried out with glucose and sorbitol solutions (40–60 % w/w), dehydrating plum pieces during 2 h at temperatures of 25 and 40ºC, with fruit/solution ratios of 1/4 and 1/10. For calculating effective diffusion coefficients, a novelty inverse-method was applied, the approximate shape of food-pieces was considered using Finite Elements Method. Calculated diffusion coefficients ranged from 1.13 × 10 −09 to 4.71 × 10 −09 m 2 s −1 and 0.44 × 10 −09 to 3.46 × 10 −09 m 2 s −1 , for water and solutes, respectively.

29 December 2014 in Journal of Food Process Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAnabel Rodriguez
Anabel Rodriguez
MRMaría Marcela Rodríguez
María Marcela Rodríguez
RMRodolfo Horacio Horacio Mascheroni
Rodolfo Horacio Horacio Mascheroni