Arseniy Trukhanov

Dr. Arseniy Trukhanov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 July 2024 in Ageing Research Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IYIgor Yusipov
Igor Yusipov
AKAlena Kalyakulina
Alena Kalyakulina
ATArseniy Trukhanov
Arseniy Trukhanov
CFClaudio Franceschi
Claudio Franceschi
MIMikhail Ivanchenko
Mikhail Ivanchenko

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlena Kalyakulina
Alena Kalyakulina
IYIgor Yusipov
Igor Yusipov
ATArseniy Trukhanov
Arseniy Trukhanov
CFClaudio Franceschi
Claudio Franceschi
Alexey MoskalevAlexey Moskalev
Alexey Moskalev
MIMikhail Ivanchenko
Mikhail Ivanchenko
We present EpInflammAge, an explainable deep learning tool that integrates epigenetic and inflammatory markers to create a highly accurate, disease-sensitive biological age predictor. This novel approach bridges two key hallmarks of aging—epigenetic alterations and immunosenescence. First, epigenetic and inflammatory data from the same participants was used for AI models predicting levels of 24 cytokines from blood DNA methylation. Second, open-source epigenetic data (25 thousand samples) was used for generating synthetic inflammatory biomarkers and training an age estimation model. Using state-of-the-art deep neural networks optimized for tabular data analysis, EpInflammAge achieves competitive performance metrics against 34 epigenetic clock models, including an overall mean absolute error of 7 years and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.85 in healthy controls, while demonstrating robust sensitivity across multiple disease categories. Explainable AI revealed the contribution of each feature to the age prediction. The sensitivity to multiple diseases due to combining inflammatory and epigenetic profiles is promising for both research and clinical applications. EpInflammAge is released as an easy-to-use web tool that generates the age estimates and levels of inflammatory parameters for methylation data, with the detailed report on the contribution of input variables to the model output for each sample.

9 August 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OVOlga Vershinina
Olga Vershinina
Victoria D TurubanovaVictoria D Turubanova
Victoria D Turubanova
MKMikhail Krivonosov
Mikhail Krivonosov
ATArseniy Trukhanov
Arseniy Trukhanov
MIMikhail Ivanchenko
Mikhail Ivanchenko
Background/Objectives: Gliomas are complex and heterogeneous brain tumors characterized by an unfavorable clinical course and a fatal prognosis, which can be improved by an early determination of tumor kind. Here, we developed explainable machine learning (ML) models for classifying three major glioma subtypes (astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and glioblastoma) and predicting survival rates based on RNA-seq data. Methods: We analyzed publicly available datasets and applied feature selection techniques to identify key biomarkers. Using various ML models, we performed classification and survival analysis to develop robust predictive models. The best-performing models were then interpreted using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Thirteen key genes (TERT, NOX4, MMP9, TRIM67, ZDHHC18, HDAC1, TUBB6, ADM, NOG, CHEK2, KCNJ11, KCNIP2, and VEGFA) proved to be closely associated with glioma subtypes as well as survival. Support Vector Machine (SVM) turned out to be the optimal classification model with the balanced accuracy of 0.816 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.896 for the test datasets. The Case-Control Cox regression model (CoxCC) proved best for predicting survival with the Harrell’s C-index of 0.809 and 0.8 for the test datasets. Using SHAP we revealed the gene expression influence on the outputs of both models, thus enhancing the transparency of the prediction generation process. Conclusions: The results indicated that the developed models could serve as a valuable practical tool for clinicians, assisting them in diagnosing and determining optimal treatment strategies for patients with glioma.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlena Kalyakulina
Alena Kalyakulina
IYIgor Yusipov
Igor Yusipov
ЕКЕлена Vladimirona Кондакова
Елена Vladimirona Кондакова
TSTatyana Sivtseva
Tatyana Sivtseva
RZRaisa Zakharova
Raisa Zakharova
MIMikhail Ivanchenko
Mikhail Ivanchenko
Yakutia is one of the coldest permanently inhabited regions in the world, characterized by a subarctic climate with average January temperatures near −40 °C and the minimum below −60 °C. Recently, we demonstrated accelerated epigenetic aging of the Yakutian population in comparison to their Central Russian counterparts, residing in a considerably milder climate. In this paper, we analyzed these cohorts from the inflammaging perspective and addressed two hypotheses: a mismatch in the immunological profiles and accelerated inflammatory aging in Yakuts. We found that the levels of 17 cytokines displayed statistically significant differences in the mean values between the groups (with minimal p-value = 2.06 × 10−19), and 6 of them are among 10 SImAge markers. We demonstrated that five out of these six markers (PDGFB, CD40LG, VEGFA, PDGFA, and CXCL10) had higher mean levels in the Yakutian cohort, and therefore, due to their positive chronological age correlation, might indicate a trend toward accelerated inflammatory aging. At the same time, a statistically significant biological age acceleration difference between the two cohorts according to the inflammatory SImAge clock was not detected because they had similar levels of CXCL9, CCL22, and IL6, the top contributing biomarkers to SImAge. We introduced an explainable deep neural network to separate individual inflammatory profiles between the two groups, resulting in over 95% accuracy. The obtained results allow for hypothesizing the specificity of cytokine and chemokine profiles among people living in extremely cold climates, possibly reflecting the effects of long-term human (dis)adaptation to cold conditions related to inflammaging and the risk of developing a number of pathologies.

15 March 2022 in Russian Pediatric Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IDIgor V. Dvoryakovskiy
Igor V. Dvoryakovskiy
ATArseniy Trukhanov
Arseniy Trukhanov
GDGalina M. Dvoryakovskaya
Galina M. Dvoryakovskaya
ISIvan E. Smirnov
Ivan E. Smirnov
Currently, the method of ultrasound diagnostics (echography) is the leading one among other imaging tools in medicine. The history of the method begins in 1942, but the main developments should be attributed to the 1950-1960s, when owing to the first ultrasound machines created in various countries, the fundamental possibility of visualizing tissue structures of various organs in normal and in various forms of pathology was proved. Since the 1970s, the solution of technical problems has led to the creation of ultrasound systems close to modern types of equipment. In the same years, ultrasound examinations for the first time began to be effectively used in the Research Institute of Pediatrics of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, where they took a worthy place among other diagnostic methods. For the first time, ultrasound techniques of various organs were developed, their normal age characteristics were established, the possibilities in the diagnosis of many forms of pathology were proved and the criteria for their differential diagnosis were determined. But at the same time, despite the significant diagnostic potential of ultrasound diagnostics, we must not forget about the sufficient subjectivity of the method, which requires special attention and knowledge when obtaining and interpreting echographic images. The newest ultrasound methods that have appeared in recent years include three- and four-dimensional echography, ultrasound tomography, the possibility of panoramic, contrast and intra-organ studies, pulse inversion harmonics, quantitative assessment of organ parenchyma, elastography, various variants of Doppler (including intravascular) methods.

28 April 2026 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMikhail Krivonosov
Mikhail Krivonosov
ATArseniy Trukhanov
Arseniy Trukhanov
NSNikita Sushentsev
Nikita Sushentsev
TBTristan Barrett
Tristan Barrett
AZAlexey Zaikin
Alexey Zaikin
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in men, and active surveillance (AS) is the recommended management strategy for low- and favourable intermediate-risk disease. Predicting which patients will progress during AS remains a clinical challenge. MRI-derived radiomics has shown promise for risk stratification, but conventional machine learning approaches treat radiomic features as independent variables and may not capture the complex inter-feature dependencies within imaging data. This study evaluates the application of Synolitic Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs) to baseline MRI-derived radiomic features for predicting prostate cancer progression on active surveillance. Methods: We studied 343 AS patients (73 progressors, 270 non-progressors) from a single-centre cohort prospectively enrolled between 2013 and 2019 and retrospectively analysed. Seventy-two radiomic features were extracted from baseline 3T MRI (T2-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps), together with three clinical variables (prostate volume, PSA, PSA density). The SGNN pipeline transformed each patient’s feature profile into a weighted graph encoding pairwise feature relationships via logistic regression classifiers trained within each cross-validation fold. GCN and GATv2 architectures were evaluated with multiple sparsification strategies and compared against Gradient Boosting, SVM, Random Forest, and logistic regression using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Results: Among conventional methods, Gradient Boosting achieved the highest ROC-AUC (0.634 ± 0.080). The SGNN pipeline with GATv2, confidence-based sparsification (p = 0.8), and extended node features incorporating graph centrality measures achieved the best performance (ROC-AUC = 0.699 ± 0.044), an absolute improvement of 0.065 over the best conventional method. The addition of topological node features consistently improved performance by 3–5% across configurations. GATv2 outperformed GCN in matched settings. Conclusions: As a proof of concept, the SGNN framework achieved the highest mean ROC-AUC among the evaluated single-timepoint approaches, though results require confirmation in independent external cohorts. By encoding inter-feature relationships as patient-specific graphs, SGNN offers a complementary modelling paradigm for radiomic data in clinical oncology. Future work should incorporate longitudinal data and graph explainability methods.