The aim was to evaluate the association between growth, carcass and visual scores traits with precocious calving in Nellore cattle. Birth weight (BW), weight at 120, 210, 365 and 450 days of age, pre and post-weaning average daily gain, rib eye area, backfat thickness (BF), rump fat thickness and visual scores obtained at 18 months were used for the analysis. Records from 700 females born between 2009 and 2015, exposed to mating starting at 11 months of age were analyzed. Discriminant analyzes were performed with the software Statistica. BW and BF showed the highest (P>0.01) discrimination value for early heifer pregnancy (EP). Extreme intrauterine growth retardation can result in slower growth, which reflects in the worst reproductive performance, confirmed by the variation in BW between precocious and conventional heifers. The results also demonstrate that the level of body fat affects begin of puberty. Bone structure, musculature, depth, tail insertion and rump scores presented the highest discrimination value for EP. These traits can be used as selection tools to improve sexual precocity in female Nellore cattle. The results obtained in this study would support farmers to guide the heifer management and decisions in order to enhance the EP.

Context: Livestock feed costs have a higher impact on the profitability of beef production systems and are directly related to feed efficiency. However, these traits are hard and have high costs to measure, reducing the availability of phenotypic records and reliability of genetic evaluations. Thus, the use of genomic information can increase the robustness of genetic studies that address them. Aims: The aim of the present study was to estimate genetic parameters for feed efficiency, growth, reproductive and carcass traits in Nelore cattle and the correlated response among them, using genomic information. Methods: Residual feed intake (RFI), dry-matter intake, feed conversion ratio, feed efficiency (FE), residual average daily gain (RG), residual feed intake and average daily gain (RIG), birthweight, weight at 120, 240, 365 and 450 days of age, scrotal circumference at 365 and 450 days of age, rib-eye area, backfat thickness and rump fat thickness were evaluated. The genetic parameters were estimated using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction approach. Key results: The FE-related traits showed low to moderate heritability ranging from 0.07 to 0.23. Feed efficiency-related traits showed low genetic correlations with reproductive (–0.24 to 0.27), carcass (–0.17 to 0.27) and growth (–0.19 to 0.24) traits, except for growth with dry-matter intake (0.32–0.56) and weight at 365 days of age with FE (–0.40). Conclusions: The selection to improve growth, reproductive and carcass traits would not change RFI, RG and RIG. The choice of the most adequate selection criterion depends on the production system, that is, RFI might be used for low-input beef cattle systems, and RIG would be used for more intensive and without-any-dietary-restrictions beef cattle systems. Implications: The estimates of heritability and genetic correlations suggest that genetic selection for feed efficiency using RFI, RG and RIG in Nellore cattle leads to higher genetic gain than does that using FE and feed conversion ratio without affecting other profitability traits.

There is a growing interest to improve feed efficiency (FE) traits in cattle. The genomic selection was proposed to improve these traits since they are difficult and expensive to measure. Up to date, there are scarce studies about the implementation of genomic selection for FE traits in indicine cattle under different scenarios of pseudo-phenotypes, models, and validation strategies on a commercial large scale. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the feasibility of genomic selection implementation for FE traits in Nelore cattle applying different models and pseudo-phenotypes under validation strategies. Phenotypic and genotypic information from 4 329 and 3 467 animals were used, respectively, which were tested for residual feed intake, DM intake, feed efficiency, feed conversion ratio, residual BW gain, and residual intake and BW gain. Six prediction methods were used: single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes Cπ, Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (BLASSO), and Bayes R. Phenotypes adjusted for fixed effects (Y*), estimated breeding value (EBV), and EBV deregressed (DEBV) were used as pseudo-phenotypes. The validation approaches used were: (1) random: the data was randomly divided into ten subsets and the validation was done in each subset at a time; (2) age: the partition into training and testing sets was based on year of birth and testing animals were born after 2016; and (3) EBV accuracy: the data was split into two groups, being animals with accuracy above 0.45 the training set; and below 0.45 the validation set. In the analyses that used the Y* as pseudo-phenotype, prediction ability (PA) was obtained by dividing the correlation between pseudo-phenotype and genomic EBV (GEBV) by the square root of the heritability of the trait. When EBV and DEBV were used as the pseudo-phenotype, the simple correlation of this quantity with the GEBV was considered as PA. The prediction methods show similar results for PA and bias. The random cross-validation presented higher PA (0.17) than EBV accuracy (0.14) and age (0.13). The PA was higher for Y* than for EBV and DEBV (30.0 and 34.3%, respectively). Random validation presented the highest PA, being indicated for use in populations composed mainly of young animals and traits with few generations of data recording. For high heritability traits, the validation can be done by age, enabling the prediction of the next-generation genetic merit. These results would support breeders to identify genomic approaches that are more viable for genomic prediction for FE-related traits.