Background: Control system design for a microprocessor-controlled hip–knee–ankle–foot (HKAF) prosthesis is a challenge since hip disarticulation amputees lack the entire leg and, therefore, only have pelvis movement as user-guided input. This research proposes a method for determining hip joint angles from pelvis movement in a control system for the next generation of powered prostheses. Method: Three-dimensional pelvic motion and stance time of 10 transfemoral (TF) prosthetic users were used to identify important features and to develop an algorithm to calculate hip angles from pelvis movement based on correlation and linear regression results. The algorithm was then applied to a separate (independent) TF group to validate algorithm performance. Results: The proposed algorithm calculated viable hip angles during walking by utilizing pelvic rotation, pelvic tilt, and stance time. Small angular differences were found between the algorithm results and motion capture data. The greatest difference was for hip maximum extension angle (2.5 ± 2.0°). Conclusions: Since differences between algorithm output and motion data were within participant standard deviations, the developed algorithm could be used to determine the desired hip angle from pelvis movements. This study will aid the future development of gait control systems for new active HKAF prostheses.

Hip disarticulation (HD) amputees face mobility challenges due to the loss of hip, knee, and ankle joints. Current hip-knee-ankle-foot (HKAF) prostheses are entirely passive and require excessive compensatory movements to operate, leading to fatigue and long-term complications. Seeking to address these limitations, this study developed a HD user-centric, walking speed adaptable control strategy paired with a hip-motorized HKAF to emulate gait characteristics of transfemoral amputees. A prototype “Power Hip” was instrumented with internal sensors (IMUs, load cells, joint encoders) to create a prosthetic unit that could be worn without the need for external sensors. A hierarchical gait control strategy was developed to utilize these sensors to calculate the desired hip states and actuate the joint. To evaluate capabilities of the control strategy, an HD amputee participant was recruited to undergo training with Power Hip. Once training was complete, motion captured kinematics and onboard sensor data were analyzed across slow, self-paced, and fast walking speed trials. The Power Hip enabled walking speeds of 0.69–1.01 m/s, with stride parameters aligning with transfemoral amputee outcome measures. Hip extension velocities (60.2–104.9°/s) matched transfemoral kinematics, though swing-phase knee flexion magnitude and velocity were reduced compared to transfemoral benchmarks. The prototype demonstrated a 52° hip range of motion, surpassing conventional passive hip joints, and adapted to speed changes automatically. This research paves the way for advanced prosthetic solutions to improve quality of life for people with hip-level amputations.

Background/Objectives: Hip-level amputees face ambulatory challenges due to the lack of a lower limb and prosthetic hip power. Some hip-level amputees restore mobility by using a prosthesis with hip, knee, and ankle joints. Powered prosthetic joints contain an actuator that provides external flexion-extension moments to assist with movement. Powered knee and powered ankle-foot units are on the market, but no viable powered hip unit is commercially available. This research details the development of a novel powered four-bar prosthetic hip joint that can be integrated into a full-leg prosthesis. Methods: The hip joint design consisted of a four-bar linkage with a harmonic drive DC motor placed in the inferior link and an additional linkage to transfer torque from the motor to the hip center of rotation. Link lengths were determined through engineering optimization. Device strength was demonstrated with force and finite element analysis and with ISO 15032:2000 A100 static compression tests. Walking tests with a wearable hip-knee-ankle-foot prosthesis simulator, containing the novel powered hip, were conducted with three able-bodied participants. Each participant walked back and forth on a level 10 m walkway. Custom hardware and software captured joint angles. Spatiotemporal parameters were determined from video clips processed in the Kinovea software (ver. 0.9.5). Results: The powered hip passed all force and finite element checks and ISO 15032:2000 A100 static compression tests. The participants, weighing 96 ± 2 kg, achieved steady gait at 0.45 ± 0.11 m/s with the powered hip. Participant kinematic gait profiles resembled those seen in transfemoral amputee gait. Some gait asymmetries occurred between the sound and prosthetic legs. No signs of mechanical failure were seen. Most design requirements were met. Areas for powered hip improvement include hip flexion range, mechanical advantage at high hip flexion, and device mass. Conclusions: The novel powered four-bar hip provides safe level-ground walking with a full-leg prosthesis simulator and is viable for future testing with hip-level amputees.

Background: Sitting and standing with conventional hip–knee–ankle–foot (HKAF) prostheses are demanding tasks for hip disarticulation (HD) amputees due to the passive nature of current prosthetic hip joints that cannot assist with moment generation. This study developed a sitting and standing control strategy for a motorized hip joint and evaluated whether providing active assistance reduces the intact side demand of these activities. Methods: A dedicated control strategy was developed and implemented for a motorized hip prosthesis (Power Hip) compatible with existing prosthetic knees, feet, and sockets. One HD participant was trained to perform sitting and standing tasks using the Power Hip. Its performance was compared with the participant’s prescribed passive HKAF prosthesis through measurements of ground reaction forces (GRFs), joint moments, and activity durations. GRFs were collected using force plates, kinematics were captured via Theia3D markerless motion capture, and joint moments were computed in Visual3D. Results: The Power Hip enabled more symmetric limb loading and faster stand-to-sit transitions (1.22 ± 0.08 s vs. 2.62 ± 0.41 s), while slightly prolonging sit-to-stand (1.69 ± 0.49 s vs. 1.22 ± 0.40 s) compared to the passive HKAF. The participant exhibited reduced intact-side loading impulses during stand-to-sit (4.97 ± 0.78 N∙s/kg vs. 15.06 ± 2.90 N∙s/kg) and decreased reliance on upper-limb support. Hip moment asymmetries between the intact and prosthetic sides were also reduced during both sit-to-stand (−0.18 ± 0.09 N/kg vs. −0.69 ± 0.67 N/kg) and stand-to-sit transitions (0.77 ± 0.20 N/kg vs. 2.03 ± 0.58 N/kg). Conclusions: The prototype and control strategy demonstrated promising improvements in sitting and standing performance compared to conventional passive prostheses, reducing the physical demand on the intact limb and upper body.