Giorgio Carrozzi

Dr. Giorgio Carrozzi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 April 2026 in Surgeries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMatteo Guzzini
Matteo Guzzini
GFGiulia Frittella
Giulia Frittella
GCGiorgio Carrozzi
Giorgio Carrozzi
RVRocco De Vitis
Rocco De Vitis
LALeopoldo Arioli
Leopoldo Arioli
Background/Objectives: Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMC OA) is a common disabling condition. This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of trapeziectomy with suspension arthroplasty and dual mobility TMC joint replacement in a prospective comparative cohort study design. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted on 122 patients contributing 129 hands with Eaton–Littler stage II–III TMC osteoarthritis. Patients were treated with trapeziectomy with suspension arthroplasty (58 patients, 60 hands) or TMC joint replacement with a dual mobility prosthesis (64 patients, 69 hands), based on surgical indication and shared decision-making. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed up to 24 months postoperatively. Results: Both techniques significantly improved pain, function, range of motion, and strength (p < 0.05). Joint replacement provided faster pain relief and functional recovery, with superior strength at all follow-up points. At 12 months, pain and functional outcomes were comparable between groups. No implant loosening or failures were observed. Conclusions: Both surgical techniques are effective for TMC osteoarthritis. Dual mobility TMC joint replacement allows faster recovery and greater strength, while achieving comparable mid-term clinical outcomes to suspension arthroplasty.

25 March 2026 in Osteology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGiorgio Carrozzi
Giorgio Carrozzi
LSLuca Saccone
Luca Saccone
LVLuca La Verde
Luca La Verde
ABAngelo Baldari
Angelo Baldari
ACantonio caldaria
antonio caldaria
FFFrancesco Franceschi
Francesco Franceschi
Background: In revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), clinical focus is mainly on the femoral and tibial components, while patellar complications are often underemphasized. However, patellar bone deficiency is a significant issue that can negatively affect surgical outcomes, especially in septic revisions. Objective: This review provides an overview of contemporary approaches to the evaluation and treatment of patellar bone loss in rTKA, emphasizing preoperative planning, classification frameworks, and treatment options. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted. Studies published between 2000 and 2024 addressing preoperative assessment, surgical techniques, and outcomes in the management of patellar bone loss in rTKA were screened. Discussion: A recent consensus has addressed the evaluation, classification, and treatment of significant bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), providing specific recommendations for the management of patellar bone loss and extensor mechanism involvement in cases of severe bone deficiency. In this review, the principal surgical strategies described in the literature are summarized, including patellar component retention or revision, the use of biconvex inlay and trabecular metal implants, bone grafting, various augmentation techniques, resection arthroplasty, gull-wing osteotomy, and patellectomy. Conclusions: Despite various surgical strategies, no consensus exists on a universally superior approach. Ongoing research is essential to establishing standardized, evidence-based protocols for effective management of patellar bone loss in rTKA.