Background: Heat application before peripheral intravenous catheterization is recommended for venous dilation. Hot pack application enlarges the venous diameter in healthy adults; however, hot towels (moist and dry heat) are used often in some medical cases. However, it is unclear whether hot towel application promotes venous dilation better than hot pack application. This study compared the venous dilation effect of using a hot towel (moist and dry heat) to a hot pack before applying the tourniquet at an access site for peripheral intravenous catheterization. Methods: Eighty-eight healthy females aged 18–29 years were recruited for this quasi-experimental study. They underwent three types of heat applications (hot pack, moist hot towel, and dry hot towel [moist hot towel wrapped in a dry plastic bag], all of which were warmed to 40 ± 2 °C and performed for 7 min) to their forearm and tourniquet application for 30 s after each heating. Venous diameter and depth were measured using ultrasonography, and venous palpability and visibility (venous assessment score) was observed as venous dilatation effects. In addition, the skin temperature, stratum corneum hydration, and subjective evaluation of the warmth were measured. Results: There were no significant differences in venous diameter and assessment scores after intervention between the dry hot towel and the hot pack groups, and the effect size was negligible (Cohen’s d < 0.20). However, these measurements were significantly lower for the moist hot towel than for the other two heat applications (P < .001). Although there was no significant difference in skin temperature and warmth rating score between the dry hot towel and the hot pack, these were significantly lower for the moist hot towel than for the other two heat applications (P < .001). The amount of change in stratum corneum hydration of the dry hot towel was not significantly different from that of the hot pack; however, that of the moist hot towel was significantly larger than that of the other two heat applications (P < . 001.) Conclusions: A method in which a towel warmed in hot water is wrapped in a dry barrier may be an alternative to a hot pack. Trial registration: This study was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (Registration No.: UMIN000048308. Registered on July 7, 2022).

Objective: Blood flow in the hepatic veins and superior vena cava (SVC) reflects right heart filling; however, their Doppler profiles are often not identical, and no studies have compared their diagnostic efficacies. We aimed to determine which venous Doppler profile is reliable for detecting elevated right atrial pressure (RAP). Methods: In 193 patients with cardiovascular diseases who underwent cardiac catheterization within 2 d of echocardiography, the hepatic vein systolic filling fraction (HV-SFF) and the ratio of the peak systolic to diastolic forward velocities of the SVC (SVC-S/D) were measured. HV-SFF < 55% and SVC-S/D < 1.9 were regarded as elevated RAP. We also calculated the fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4) as a serum liver fibrosis marker. Results: HV-SFF and SVC-S/D were feasible in 177 (92%) and 173 (90%) patients, respectively. In the 161 patients in whom both venous Doppler waveforms could be measured, HV-SFF and SVC-S/D were inversely correlated with RAP (r = -0.350, p < 0.001; r = -0.430, p < 0.001, respectively). SVC-S/D > 1.9 showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy of RAP elevation compared with HV-SFF < 55% (area under the curve, 0.842 vs. 0.614, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that both FIB-4 (beta = -0.211, p = 0.013) and mean RAP (beta = -0.319, p < 0.001) were independent determinants of HV-SFF. In contrast, not FIB-4 but mean RAP (beta = -0.471, p < 0.001) was an independent determinant of SVC-S/D. The diagnostic accuracy remained unchanged when HV-SFF < 55% was considered in conjunction with the estimated RAP based on the inferior vena cava morphology. Conversely, SVC-S/D showed an incremental diagnostic value over the estimated RAP. Conclusions: SVC-S/D enabled a more accurate diagnosis of RAP elevation than HV-SFF.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of left ventricular filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) remains difficult. A novel 2-dimensional scoring system, visually assessing time difference between mitral valve and tricuspid valve opening (VMT) score, based on temporal analysis of early diastolic valve opening, could be applied to these patients. We aimed to determine the usefulness of the VMT score in patients with AF. METHODS: We analyzed 119 consecutive patients with AF who underwent cardiac catheterization as a derivation cohort. The diagnostic performance of the VMT score was further evaluated in an external data set containing 189 patients with AF. Elevated left ventricular filling pressure was defined as a mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≥15 mm Hg. The time sequence of atrioventricular valve opening was visually assessed and scored (0, tricuspid valve first; 1, simultaneous; 2, mitral valve first). When the inferior vena cava was dilated, 1 point was added, and the VMT score was finally graded as 0 to 3. Conventional Doppler parameters to estimate left ventricular filling pressure were also measured. RESULTS: Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure was elevated with an increase in the VMT score (0: 10±3, 1: 13±5, 2: 22±7, 3: 27±6 mm Hg; P <0.001), resulting in a significant rise in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure from VMT score 1 to 2. VMT≥2 predicted elevated pulmonary arterial wedge pressure with an accuracy of 87%, and the diagnostic accuracy of the VMT score was significantly higher than that of conventional Doppler parameters ( C index, 0.88 versus 0.54–0.68; P <0.001). In addition, VMT ≥2 showed an incremental predictive value over plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels ( C index, 0.79–0.93; P <0.001). In the external validation cohort, VMT≥2 demonstrated acceptable accuracy of 72%. CONCLUSIONS: VMT scoring was a useful echocardiographic marker of elevated left ventricular filling pressure and had an incremental benefit over practical biomarkers in patients with AF.