Summary: CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR‐T) play different roles in the in vivo anti‐tumour response, but the role of the CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio among infused CAR‐T has not been clearly defined yet. We analysed leftovers from infused anti‐CD19 CAR‐T bags of 31 patients with aggressive B‐cell lymphomas. The median ratio was 1.44, lower for brexu‐cel compared to tisa‐cel and axi‐cel. The CAR+CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio was influenced by lactate dehydrogenase levels at apheresis, not by age, previous treatments or the CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio in peripheral blood. Patients with a response at 3 months after CAR‐T (M3) had a lower CAR+CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio in the infused products compared to non‐responders (ratio 0.74 vs. 2.47, p = 0.011). A CAR+CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio higher than the cut point of 1.12 was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure at M3 (OR 23.3, p = 0.012) and M6 (OR 10, p = 0.028). The median 6‐month PFS was 76% for patients with a ratio lower than 1.12% vs. 31% for the others. The prognostic role of the CAR+CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio was independent of the costimulatory domain (CD28 vs. 4‐1BB) of the product (OR 16.41, p = 0.041). Our data indicate a crucial role for CD8⁺ CAR‐T and the CAR+CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio in predicting CAR‐T efficacy.

Summary: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and consumptive coagulopathy can complicate the treatment with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cells. The modified version of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX), a score derived from haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, combines platelets, C‐reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and has been correlated with CRS and endothelial biomarkers. In 38 consecutive patients with aggressive lymphoproliferative disease we measured a coagulative laboratory panel at baseline and early after infusion of anti‐CD19 CAR‐T. The panel was investigated also in the presence of CRS graded 2 or higher, or immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Moreover, we examined the relationship between mEASIX, coagulation biomarkers, and toxicities of CAR‐T cells. During CRS grade 2 or higher, we found increased prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, D‐dimer, factor VIII (FVIII), and von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen levels, and decreased platelet count and antithrombin levels. The occurrence of immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome was associated with higher PT values, D‐dimer, FVIII, and vWF levels, and decreased fibrinogen levels and platelet count. A higher mEASIX score correlated with increased aPTT values, fibrinogen, D‐dimer, FVIII and vWF levels, and decreased antithrombin levels. Baseline mEASIX was predictive for consumptive coagulopathy and CRS graded 2 or higher, and for progression‐free survival and overall survival.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment is important to facilitate decisions in the current treatment landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Therefore, the availability of a validated HRQOL questionnaire, specifically developed for CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), may enhance quality of research in this area. We performed an international study including 782 CML patients to assess the validity of the EORTC QLQ-CML 24 questionnaire, and to generate HRQOL reference values to facilitate interpretation of results in future studies. Internal consistency, assessed with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, ranged from 0.66 to 0.83. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all standardized factor loadings exceeded the threshold of 0.40 (range 0.49–0.97), confirming the hypothesized scale structure. Reference values stratified by age and sex were also generated. Our findings support the use of the EORTC QLQ-CML 24, in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30, as a valuable measure to assess HRQOL in CML patients.

The prognosis of patients with blast crisis (BC) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is still dismal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents the only curative treatment option, but data on transplant outcomes are scarce. We therefore conducted a retrospective, registry-based study of adult patients allografted for BC CML, focusing on patients with active disease at transplant and pretransplant prognostic factors. One hundred seventy patients allografted for BC CML after tyrosine kinase inhibitor pretreatment between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed. Before transplant, 95 patients were in remission, whereas 75 patients had active BC. In multivariable analysis of the entire cohort, active BC at transplant was the strongest factor associated with decreased overall survival (hazrd ratio, 1.87; P = .010) and shorter leukemia-free survival (LFS; hazard ratio, 1.69; P = .017). For patients with BC in remission at transplant, advanced age (≥45 years), lower performance status (≤80%), longer interval from diagnosis BC to transplant (>12 months), myeloablative conditioning, and unrelated donor (UD) transplant were risk factors for inferior survival. In patients with active BC, only UD transplant was significantly associated with prolonged LFS and trended toward improved overall survival. In summary, survival of patients allografted for BC CML was strongly dependent on pretransplant remission status. In patients with remission of BC, conventional prognostic factors remained the major determinants of outcome, whereas in those with active BC at transplant, UD transplant was associated with prolonged LFS in our study.

This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with baseline characteristics matched by stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.0001) but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year (46.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.0059). Differences in overall survival and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, P < 0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, balancing bridging, safety, and efficacy considerations for individual patients. Significance: The findings of this study on 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with commercial axi-cel and tisa-cel indicate axi-cel’s superior PFS after propensity score weighting. The predictive utility of CAR-HEMATOTOX in assessing not only toxicity but also outcomes across both CAR T-cell products may guide future risk-stratified management strategies.