Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) play an increasingly vital role in wilderness search and rescue (SAR) operations by enhancing situational awareness and extending the capabilities of human teams. Yet, a lack of standardized benchmarks has impeded the systematic evaluation of single- and multi-agent path-planning algorithms. This paper introduces an open-source dataset and evaluation framework to address this gap. The framework comprises 60 geospatial scenarios across four distinct European environments, featuring high-resolution probability maps. We present a lost person probabilistic model derived from statistical models of lost person behavior. We provide a suite of tools for evaluating search paths against four baseline methods: Concentric Circles, Pizza Zigzag, Greedy, and Random Exploration, using three quantitative metrics: Accumulated probability of detection, time-discounted probability of detection, and lost person discovery score. We provide an evaluation framework to facilitate the comparative analysis of single- and multi-agent path-planning algorithms, supporting both the baseline methods presented and custom user-defined path generators. By providing a structured and extensible framework, this work establishes a foundation for the rigorous and reproducible assessment of UAV search strategies in complex wilderness environments.