Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) either by balloon devices or radiofrequency forms the cornerstone of invasive atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Although equally effective cryoballoon (CB)-based PVI offers shorter procedure duration and a better safety profile. Beside the worldwide established Arctic Front Advance system, a novel CB device, POLARx, was recently introduced. This CB incorporates unique features, which may translate into improved efficacy and safety. However, multicentre assessment of periprocedural efficacy and safety is lacking up to date. A total of 317 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were included and underwent POLARx CB-based PVI in 6 centres from Germany and Italy. Acute efficacy and safety were assessed in this prospective multicenter observational study. In 317 patients [mean age: 64 ± 12 years, 209 of 317 (66%) paroxysmal AF], a total of 1256 pulmonary veins (PVs) were identified and 1252 (99,7%) PVs were successfully isolated utilizing mainly the short tip POLARx CB (82%). The mean minimal CB temperature was −57.9 ± 7°C. Real-time PVI was registered in 72% of PVs. The rate of serious adverse events was 6.0% which was significantly reduced after a learning curve of 25 cases (9.3% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.018). The rate of recurrence-free survival after mean follow-up of 226 ± 115 days including a 90-day blanking period was 86.1%. In this large multicentre assessment, the novel POLARx CB shows a promising efficacy and safety profile after a short learning curve.

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy. Data on long-term PVI durability and reconduction patterns in comparison to established energy sources for PVI are scarce. We compare findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first PFA to findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI. A total of 550 consecutively enrolled patients underwent PFA or CBA index PVI. Repeat ablations in patients with symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrences were analysed. A total of 22/191 (12%) patients after index PFA-PVI and 44/359 (12%) after CBA-PVI underwent repeat ablation. Reconduction of any pulmonary vein (PV) was detected by multipolar spiral mapping catheter at each PV with careful evaluation of PV potentials and by 3D-mapping in 16/22 patients (73%) after PFA-PVI and in 33/44 (75%) after CBA-PVI (P = 1.000). Of 82 initially isolated PVs after PFA-PVI, 31 (38%) were reconducting; of 169 isolated PVs after CBA-PVI, 63 (37%) were reconducting (P = 0.936). Clinical atrial tachycardia occurred similarly in patients after PFA (5/22; 23%) and CBA (7/44; 16%; P = 0.515). Roof lines were set more often after PFA- (8/22; 36%) compared with CBA-PVI (5/44; 11%; P = 0.023). Repeat procedure duration [PFA: 87 (76, 123) min; CBA: 93 (75, 128) min; P = 0.446] was similar and fluoroscopy time [PFA: 11 (9, 14) min; CBA: 11 (8, 14) min; P = 0.739] equal between groups at repeat ablation. During repeat ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI, electrical PV-reconduction rates and patterns were similar.

Aims: A novel three-dimensional mapping platform combined with a lattice-tip catheter that can toggle between monopolar pulsed field ablation (PFA) and radiofrequency energy delivery was recently launched. So far, the system was predominantly applied in general anaesthesia (GA), not in deep sedation. Methods and results: Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled, and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and ablation of additional linear lesion sets were performed either in GA or in deep sedation. Pulsed field ablation was applied exclusively to perform ipsilateral PVI. A total of 63 patients (35% female, 75% persistent AF, mean age 64 ± 9 years) were included in the analysis with 23 patients treated in GA and 40 patients in deep sedation. Acute efficacy was comparable in both groups with a PVI rate of 100%. Additional 74 lesion sets were performed in the total cohort. Mean procedure and lab occupancy time in the GA and deep sedation group was 96 ± 24 min vs. 100 ± 23 min (P = 0.52) and 165 ± 40 min vs. 131 ± 35 min (P = 0.0008). Mean dose area product was 489 (216;1093) vs. 452 (272;882) cGycm2 in the GA and the deep sedation group (P = 0.82). There was one conversion from deep sedation to GA. There were no map shifts observed in any group. Pericardial tamponade occurred in one patient of the deep sedation group. Conclusion: The use of a novel ablation platform in conjunction with a lattice-tip catheter in deep sedation is feasible, effective, and associated with significantly shorter lab occupancy time when compared with GA.

Introduction: Cryoballoon (CB) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a novel cryoablation system was introduced. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, efficacy and biophysical characteristics of a novel cryoablation system (POLARx™; Boston Scientific) to a commonly used and clinically well characterized system (Arctic Front Advance Pro™, AFA; Medtronic).Methods and Results: Fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic AF, who underwent CB‐based ablation with the POLARx were compared to 50 consecutive patients treated with the AFA. Acute PVI was achieved in 99.8% (POLARx 99.5%, AFA 100%, p = 1.00). Time to isolation (TTI) was comparable in both groups (POLARx 35 [27, 48] s, AFA 30 [21, 43] s, p = 0.165). The POLARx showed a lower balloon temperature at TTI (POLARx −44 [−50, −36] °C, AFA −31 [−38, −21] °C, p < 0.001) and lower nadir temperature (POLARx −60 [−65, −55] °C, AFA −48 [−54, −45] °C, p < 0.001). Procedure time (POLARx 80 [60, 105] min, AFA 62 [42, 80] min, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (POLARx 17 [13, 22] min, AFA 11 [7, 16] min, p < 0.001) and freeze cycles per patient (POLARx 5 [4, 6], AFA 4.5 [4, 5], p = 0.002) were higher in the POLARx group. Two cerebral ischemic events occurred in the POLARx group, two patients in each group had phrenic nerve injury.Conclusion: Both systems enable effective isolation of pulmonary veins. The POLARx required longer procedure and fluoroscopy times. Larger, prospective and randomized studies are needed to assess long‐term efficacy and safety of this technology.

Introduction: Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) and the multielectrode radiofrequency balloon (RFB) are two novel ablation technologies to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). It is currently unknown whether these technologies differ in lesion formation and lesion extent. We compared the acute lesion extent after PVI induced by PFA and RFB by measuring low‐voltage area in high‐density maps and the release of biomolecules reflecting cardiac injury.Methods: PVI was performed with a pentaspline catheter (FARAPULSE) applying PFA or with the compliant multielectrode RFB (HELIOSTAR). Before and after PVI high‐density mapping with CARTO 3 was performed. In addition, blood samples were taken before transseptal puncture and after post‐PVI remapping and serum concentrations of high‐sensitive Troponin I were quantified by immunoassay.Results: Sixty patients undergoing PVI by PFA (n = 28, age 69 ± 12 year, 60% males, 39.3% persistent atrial fibrillation [AF]) or RFB (n = 32, age 65 ± 13 year, 53% males, 21.9% persistent AF) were evaluated. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients in both groups. Mean number of PFA pulses was 34.2 ± 4.5 and mean number RFB applications was 8.5 ± 3 per patient. Total posterior ablation area was significantly larger in PFA (20.7 ± 7.7 cm²) than in RFB (7.1 ± 2.09 cm²; p < .001). Accordingly, posterior ablation area for each PV resulted in larger lesions after PFA versus RFB (LSPV 5.2 ± 2.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², LIPV 5.5 ± 2.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², RSPV 4.7 ± 1.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5 cm², RIPV 5.3 ± 2.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 cm,² respectively; p < .001). In a subset of 38 patients, increase of hsTropI was higher after PFA (625 ± 138 pg/mL, n = 28) versus RFB (148 ± 36 pg/mL, n = 10; p = .049) supporting the evidence of larger lesion extent by PFA.Conclusion: PFA delivers larger acute lesion areas and higher troponin release upon successful PVI than multielectrode RFB‐based PVI in this single‐center series.

Background: Despite advances in efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PVI remains common. PV‐reconnection is the main finding during repeat PVI procedures performed to treat recurrent AF.Objective: To analyze pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns during repeat ablation procedures in a large cohort of consecutive patients undergoing radio frequency or cryoballoon‐based PVI.Methods: Retrospective analysis of PV‐reconnection patterns and analysis of re‐ablation strategies in consecutive index RF‐ and CB‐based PVI and their respective re‐ablation procedures during concomitant usage of both energy sources at a single high‐volume center in Germany.Results: A total of 610 first (06/2015–10/2022) and 133 s (01/2016–11/2022) repeat ablation procedures after 363 (60%) RF‐ and 247 (40%) CB‐based index PVIs between 01/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed. PV‐reconnection was found in 509/610 (83%) patients at first and 74/133 (56%) patients at second repeat procedure. 465 of 968 (48%) initially via CB isolated PVs were reconnected at first re‐ablation but 796 of 1422 initially RF‐isolated PV (56%) were reconnected (OR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62–0.86]; p < .001). This was driven by fewer reconnections of the left PVs (LSPV: OR: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.42–0.86]; p = .005 and LSPV: 0.67 [0.47–0.95]; p = .026). PV‐reconnection was more likely after longer, RF‐based index PVI and in older females. Repeat procedures were shorter after CB‐compared to after RF‐PVI.Conclusions: Reconnection remains the most common reason for repeat AF ablation procedures after PVI. Our data suggest to preferentially use of the cryoballoon during index PVI, especially in older women.