Ioana Dragomir

Ms. Ioana Dragomir


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 September 2025 in Prosthesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cristian TarbaCristian Tarba
Cristian Tarba
IDIoana Dragomir
Ioana Dragomir
MBMedeea-Ioana Baciu
Medeea-Ioana Baciu
OVOana Elena Burlacu Vatamanu
Oana Elena Burlacu Vatamanu
Ionut Gabriel GhioneaIonut Gabriel Ghionea
Ionut Gabriel Ghionea
Corina Marilena CristacheCorina Marilena Cristache
Corina Marilena Cristache
Background/Objectives: Auricular epitheses play a vital role in restoring facial symmetry and patient confidence following congenital or acquired defects. Traditional wax-based fabrication is labor-intensive and lacks reproducibility. This study proposes and evaluates a simplified, digitally driven workflow for auricular prosthesis manufacturing, integrating virtual patient creation, mirrored ear design, and three-part mold fabrication using two design platforms—CATIA V5R21 (industrial CAD) and Blender (open-source graphics software). Key outcomes include mold reusability, patient-centered evaluation, and workflow feasibility. Methods: A 28-year-old female patient with right-sided microtia was selected. A light-based 3D facial scan was performed, and the intact contralateral ear was mirrored and adapted virtually to the defect site. Molds were designed in both CATIA and Blender using a standardized three-parallelepiped approach and printed using FDM technology (Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus). Five silicone epitheses were carefully fabricated with each mold. Surface trueness was evaluated with Geomagic Control X, while subjective assessments were conducted by an independent prosthetic team and the patient using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Results: Both design workflows resulted in clinically usable prostheses. No statistically significant difference in RMS deviation was observed (p = 0.53), although CATIA-derived epitheses achieved higher subjective scores (mean 9.22/10) compared to Blender (mean 7.67/10). The preferred prosthesis (CATIA #4) was selected for final pigmentation and delivery to the patient. All molds were reused five times without any structural damage or significant signs of wear. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that both CATIA and Blender can support an effective, patient-centered digital workflow for auricular prosthesis fabrication. The methodology enables reproducibility, mold reusability, and improved clinical accessibility of custom prosthetics.

8 August 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Cristian TarbaCristian Tarba
Cristian Tarba
IDIoana Dragomir
Ioana Dragomir
MBMedeea-Ioana Baciu
Medeea-Ioana Baciu
OVOana Elena Burlacu Vatamanu
Oana Elena Burlacu Vatamanu
Ionut Gabriel GhioneaIonut Gabriel Ghionea
Ionut Gabriel Ghionea
Corina Marilena CristacheCorina Marilena Cristache
Corina Marilena Cristache
Background/Objectives: Auricular epitheses play a vital role in restoring facial symmetry and patient confidence following congenital or acquired defects. Traditional wax-based fabrication is labor-intensive and lacks reproducibility. This study proposes and evaluates a simplified, digitally driven workflow for auricular prosthesis manufacturing, integrating virtual patient creation, mirrored ear design, and three-part mold fabrication using two design platforms—CATIA V5R21 (industrial CAD) and Blender (open-source graphics software). Key outcomes include mold reusability, patient-centered evaluation, and workflow feasibility; Methods: A 28-year-old female patient with right-sided microtia was selected. A light-based 3D facial scan was performed, and the intact contralateral ear was mirrored and adapted virtually to the defect site. Molds were designed in both CATIA and Blender using a standardized three-parallelepiped approach and printed using FDM technology (Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus). Five silicone epitheses were fabricated with each mold. Surface trueness was evaluated with Geomagic Control X, while subjective assessments were conducted by an independent prosthetic team and the patient using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS); Results: Both design workflows resulted in clinically usable prostheses. No statistically significant difference in RMS deviation was observed (p = 0.53), although CATIA-derived epitheses achieved higher subjective scores (mean 9.22/10) compared to Blender (mean 7.67/10). The preferred prosthesis (CATIA #4) was selected for final pigmentation and delivery. All molds were reused five times without structural damage; Conclusions: This study demonstrates that both CATIA and Blender can support an effective, patient-centered digital workflow for auricular prosthesis fabrication. The methodology enables reproducibility, mold reusability, and improved clinical accessibility of custom prosthetics.