Fernando E. Vega

Fernando E. Vega

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2009 in Fungal Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega
MGMark S. Goettel
Mark S. Goettel
MBMeredith Blackwell
Meredith Blackwell
DCDavid Chandler
David Chandler
MJMark A. Jackson
Mark A. Jackson
HRHelen E. Roy
Helen E. Roy

14 July 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Javier A. Ceja-NavarroJavier A. Ceja-Navarro
Javier A. Ceja-Navarro
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega
UKUlas Karaoz
Ulas Karaoz
Zhao HaoZhao Hao
Zhao Hao
SJStefan Jenkins
Stefan Jenkins
EBEoin L. Brodie
Eoin L. Brodie
The coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) is the most devastating insect pest of coffee worldwide with its infestations decreasing crop yield by up to 80%. Caffeine is an alkaloid that can be toxic to insects and is hypothesized to act as a defence mechanism to inhibit herbivory. Here we show that caffeine is degraded in the gut of H. hampei, and that experimental inactivation of the gut microbiota eliminates this activity. We demonstrate that gut microbiota in H. hampei specimens from seven major coffee-producing countries and laboratory-reared colonies share a core of microorganisms. Globally ubiquitous members of the gut microbiota, including prominent Pseudomonas species, subsist on caffeine as a sole source of carbon and nitrogen. Pseudomonas caffeine demethylase genes are expressed in vivo in the gut of H. hampei, and re-inoculation of antibiotic-treated insects with an isolated Pseudomonas strain reinstates caffeine-degradation ability confirming their key role.

1 July 2008 in Biological Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega
FPFrancisco Posada
Francisco Posada
MAM. Catherine Aime
M. Catherine Aime
MPMonica Pava-Ripoll
Monica Pava-Ripoll
FIFrancisco Infante
Francisco Infante
SRStephen A. Rehner
Stephen A. Rehner

2 January 2018 in Mycologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega
Fungal entomopathogens have been proposed as environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical control. Unfortunately, their effectiveness continues to be limited by their susceptibility to ultraviolet (UV) light and low moisture. A relatively recent development, the use of fungal entomopathogens as endophytes, might overcome the traditional obstacles impeding the widespread adoption of fungal entomopathogens and also provide a novel alternative for management of insect pests and plant pathogens. In addition, some fungal entomopathogens could also function as biofertilizers. Eighty-five papers covering 109 individual fungal entomopathogen studies involving 12 species in six genera are reviewed. Thirty-eight plant species in 19 families were studied, with maize, common bean, and tomato being the most investigated. Of the 85 papers, 39 (46%) examined the effects of fungal entomopathogen endophytism on 33 insect species in 17 families and eight orders. Thirty-four (40%) examined plant response to endophytism, corresponding to 20 plant species. Various inoculation techniques (e.g., foliar sprays, soil drenching, seed soaking, injections, etc.) are effective in introducing fungal entomopathogens as endophytes, but colonization appears to be localized and ephemeral. The field of insect pathology will not substantially profit from dozens of additional studies attempting to introduce fungal entomopathogens into a wider array of plants, without attempting to understand the mechanisms underlying endophytism, the responses of the plant to such endophytism, and the consequent responses of insect pests and plant pathogens. This review presents several areas that should receive focused attention to increase the probability of success for making this technology an effective alternative to chemical control.

28 October 2009 in BioControl
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BOBonnie H. Ownley
Bonnie H. Ownley
KGKimberly Gwinn
Kimberly Gwinn
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega

7 January 2020 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega
The evolution of a mutualism requires reciprocal interactions whereby one species provides a service that the other species cannot perform or performs less efficiently. Services exchanged in insect–fungus mutualisms include nutrition, protection, and dispersal. In ectosymbioses, which are the focus of this review, fungi can be consumed by insects or can degrade plant polymers or defensive compounds, thereby making a substrate available to insects. They can also protect against environmental factors and produce compounds antagonistic to microbial competitors. Insects disperse fungi and can also provide fungal growth substrates and protection. Insect–fungus mutualisms can transition from facultative to obligate, whereby each partner is no longer viable on its own. Obligate dependency has ( a) resulted in the evolution of morphological adaptations in insects and fungi, ( b) driven the evolution of social behaviors in some groups of insects, and ( c) led to the loss of sexuality in some fungal mutualists.