Peter Biedermann

Prof. Dr. Peter Biedermann

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
LKLawrence R. Kirkendall
Lawrence R. Kirkendall
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
BJBjarte H. Jordal
Bjarte H. Jordal

20 April 2015 in Natural Product Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLaura V. Flórez
Laura V. Flórez
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
Tobias EnglTobias Engl
Tobias Engl
MKMartin Kaltenpoth
Martin Kaltenpoth
Many organisms team up with symbiotic microbes for defense against predators, parasites, parasitoids, or pathogens. Here we review the known defensive symbioses in animals and the microbial secondary metabolites responsible for providing protection to the host.

1 October 2019 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
JMJörg Müller
Jörg Müller
JGJean-Claude Grégoire
Jean-Claude Grégoire
AGAxel Gruppe
Axel Gruppe
JHJonas Hagge
Jonas Hagge
CBClaus Bässler
Claus Bässler
Tree-killing bark beetles are the most economically important insects in conifer forests worldwide. However, despite >200 years of research, the drivers of population eruptions and crashes are still not fully understood and the existing knowledge is thus insufficient to face the challenges posed by the Anthropocene. We critically analyze potential biotic and abiotic drivers of population dynamics of an exemplary species, the European spruce bark beetle (ESBB) (Ips typographus) and present a multivariate approach that integrates the many drivers governing this bark beetle system. We call for hypothesis-driven, large-scale collaborative research efforts to improve our understanding of the population dynamics of this and other bark beetle pests. Our approach can serve as a blueprint for tackling other eruptive forest insects.

7 January 2020 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
FVFernando E. Vega
Fernando E. Vega
The evolution of a mutualism requires reciprocal interactions whereby one species provides a service that the other species cannot perform or performs less efficiently. Services exchanged in insect–fungus mutualisms include nutrition, protection, and dispersal. In ectosymbioses, which are the focus of this review, fungi can be consumed by insects or can degrade plant polymers or defensive compounds, thereby making a substrate available to insects. They can also protect against environmental factors and produce compounds antagonistic to microbial competitors. Insects disperse fungi and can also provide fungal growth substrates and protection. Insect–fungus mutualisms can transition from facultative to obligate, whereby each partner is no longer viable on its own. Obligate dependency has ( a) resulted in the evolution of morphological adaptations in insects and fungi, ( b) driven the evolution of social behaviors in some groups of insects, and ( c) led to the loss of sexuality in some fungal mutualists.

3 October 2011 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
MTMichael Taborsky
Michael Taborsky
Division of labor among the workers of insect societies is a conspicuous feature of their biology. Social tasks are commonly shared among age groups but not between larvae and adults with completely different morphologies, as in bees, wasps, ants, and beetles (i.e., Holometabola). A unique yet hardly studied holometabolous group of insects is the ambrosia beetles. Along with one tribe of ants and one subfamily of termites, wood-dwelling ambrosia beetles are the only insect lineage culturing fungi, a trait predicted to favor cooperation and division of labor. Their sociality has not been fully demonstrated, because behavioral observations have been missing. Here we present behavioral data and experiments from within nests of an ambrosia beetle,Xyleborinus saxesenii. Larval and adult offspring of a single foundress cooperate in brood care, gallery maintenance, and fungus gardening, showing a clear division of labor between larval and adult colony members. Larvae enlarge the gallery and participate in brood care and gallery hygiene. The cooperative effort of adult females in the colony and the timing of their dispersal depend on the number of sibling recipients (larvae and pupae), on the presence of the mother, and on the number of adult workers. This suggests that altruistic help is triggered by demands of brood dependent on care. Thus, ambrosia beetles are not only highly social but also show a special form of division of labor that is unique among holometabolous insects.

1 August 2009 in Environmental Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPeter Biedermann
Peter Biedermann
KKKier D. Klepzig
Kier D. Klepzig
MTMichael Taborsky
Michael Taborsky
Fungus cultivation by ambrosia beetles is one of the four independently evolved cases of agriculture known in animals. Such cultivation is most advan