Overwhelming inflammatory reactions contribute to respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19. Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor with potent anti-inflammatory properties. We report on a prospective, observational study in 34 patients with COVID-19 who received ruxolitinib on a compassionate-use protocol. Patients had severe pulmonary disease defined by pulmonary infiltrates on imaging and an oxygen saturation ≤ 93% in air and/or PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 mmHg. Median age was 80.5 years, and 85.3% had ≥ 2 comorbidities. Median exposure time to ruxolitinib was 13 days, median dose intensity was 20 mg/day. Overall survival by day 28 was 94.1%. Cumulative incidence of clinical improvement of ≥2 points in the ordinal scale was 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 71–93). Clinical improvement was not affected by low-flow versus high-flow oxygen support but was less frequent in patients with PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg. The most frequent adverse events were anemia, urinary tract infections, and thrombocytopenia. Improvement of inflammatory cytokine profile and activated lymphocyte subsets was observed at day 14. In this prospective cohort of aged and high-risk comorbidity patients with severe COVID-19, compassionate-use ruxolitinib was safe and was associated with improvement of pulmonary function and discharge home in 85.3%. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to establish efficacy of ruxolitinib in COVID-19.

Background: COVID-19 is a pandemic disease affecting predominantly the respiratory apparatus with clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to respiratory failure. Chest CT is a crucial tool in diagnosing and evaluating the severity of pulmonary involvement through dedicated scoring systems. Nonetheless, many questions regarding the relationship of radiologic and clinical features of the disease have emerged in multidisciplinary meetings. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore such relationship throughout an innovative and alternative approach.Materials and methods: This study included 550 patients (range 25–98 years; 354 males, mean age 66.1; 196 females, mean age 70.9) hospitalized for COVID-19 with available radiological and clinical data between 1 March 2021 and 30 April 2022. Radiological data included CO-RADS, chest CT score, dominant pattern, and typical/atypical findings detected on CT examinations. Clinical data included clinical score and outcome. The relationship between such features was investigated through the development of the main four frequently asked questions summarizing the many issues arisen in multidisciplinary meetings, as follows 1) CO-RADS, chest CT score, clinical score, and outcomes; 2) the involvement of a specific lung lobe and outcomes; 3) dominant pattern/distribution and severity score for the same chest CT score; 4) additional factors and outcomes.Results: 1) If CT was suggestive for COVID, a strong correlation between CT/clinical score and prognosis was found; 2) Middle lobe CT involvement was an unfavorable prognostic criterion; 3) If CT score < 50%, the pattern was not influential, whereas if CT score > 50%, crazy paving as dominant pattern leaded to a 15% increased death rate, stacked up against other patterns, thus almost doubling it; 4) Additional factors usually did not matter, but lymph-nodes and pleural effusion worsened prognosis.Conclusions: This study outlined those radiological features of COVID-19 most relevant towards disease severity and outcome with an innovative approach.

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with high risk of ischaemic stroke (IS). Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is the standard of care for stroke prevention, even though its management remains challenging in clinical practice. An emerging problem is embolic events occurring on adequately conducted OAT, the so-called resistant stroke (RS). We aimed to describe pre-stroke prevention therapy, management on hospital discharge, and therapy at follow-up in all patients with AF hospitalized for IS and in the RS subgroup. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study of patients with known AF hospitalized for an IS. A subgroup with RS was identified. We recorded information on prevention therapy at home, recommended therapy at discharge, and data on outcome and prevention therapy at follow-up. Results: We identified 226 patients, 61% females, median age 84.04 years. Preventive therapy at home was performed in 121 (53.5%) (119 OAT and 2 Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion). At hospital discharge OAT was prescribed to 78.2% of patients. RS was diagnosed in 33 patients whose management at discharge was: same OAT in 12, shift to another Direct Oral Anticoauglant (DOAC) in 5, from DOAC to Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) and vice versa in 11, non-specified OAT in 4. At final, follow-up of 208 days (range 85–443) 23.3% (34/146) did not assume OAT. OAT was significantly associated with survival probability (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings confirm a scarce adoption of guidelines for AF-related embolic events, even in the absence of absolute contraindication to OAT. RS remains an underexplored clinical entity with empirical management, highlighting the need for targeted research and tailored therapeutic strategies.