Javier Ábrego

Javier Ábrego


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2012 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IFIsabel Fonts
Isabel Fonts
GGGloria Gea
Gloria Gea
MAManuel Azuara
Manuel Azuara
Javier ÁbregoJavier Ábrego
Javier Ábrego
JAJesús Arauzo
Jesús Arauzo

19 May 2017 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJ. A. Garcia-Nunez
J. A. Garcia-Nunez
MPManuel Raul Pelaez-Samaniego
Manuel Raul Pelaez-Samaniego
Martha-Estrella García-PérezMartha-Estrella García-Pérez
Martha-Estrella García-Pérez
IFI. Fonts
I. Fonts
Javier ÁbregoJavier Ábrego
Javier Ábrego
Martha-Estrella García-PérezMartha-Estrella García-Pérez
Martha-Estrella García-Pérez
This paper provides a review of pyrolysis technologies, focusing on reactor designs and companies commercializing these technologies. The renewed interest in pyrolysis is driven by the potential to convert lignocellulosic materials into bio-oil and biochar and the use of these intermediates for the production of biofuels, biochemicals, and engineered biochars for environmental services. This review presents slow, intermediate, fast, and microwave pyrolysis as complementary technologies that share some commonalities in their designs. While slow pyrolysis technologies (traditional carbonization kilns) use wood trunks to produce char chunks for cooking, fast pyrolysis systems process small particles to maximize bio-oil yield. The realization of the environmental issues associated with the use of carbonization technologies and the technical difficulties of operating fast pyrolysis reactors using sand as the heating medium and large volumes of carrier gas, as well as the problems with refining the resulting highly oxygenated oils, are forcing the thermochemical conversion community to rethink the design and use of these reactors. Intermediate pyrolysis reactors (also known as converters) offer opportunities for the large-scale balanced production of char and bio-oil. The capacity of these reactors to process forest and agricultural wastes without much preprocessing is a clear advantage. Microwave pyrolysis is an option for modular small autonomous devices for solid waste management. Herein, the evolution of pyrolysis technology is presented from a historical perspective; thus, old and new innovative designs are discussed together.

1 January 2017 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NRNadia Ruiz-Gómez
Nadia Ruiz-Gómez
VQVioleta Quispe
Violeta Quispe
Javier ÁbregoJavier Ábrego
Javier Ábrego
María Atienza-MartínezMaría Atienza-Martínez
María Atienza-Martínez
MMMaría Benita Murillo
María Benita Murillo
GGGloria Gea
Gloria Gea
The management and valorization of residual organic matter, such as sewage sludge and manure, is gaining interest because of the increasing volume of these residues, their localized generation and the related problems. The anaerobic digestion of mixtures of sewage sludge and manure could be performed due to the similarities between both residues. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge (SS) and digested manure (DM) as a potential management technology for these residues. Pyrolysis of a sewage sludge/manure blend (50:50%) was performed at 525°C in a stirred batch reactor under N2 atmosphere. The product yields and some characteristics of the product were analyzed and compared to the results obtained in the pyrolysis of pure residues. Potential synergetic and antagonist effects during the co-pyrolysis process were evaluated. Although sewage sludge and manure seem similar in nature, there are differences in their pyrolysis product properties and distribution due to their distinct ash and organic matter composition. For the co-pyrolysis of SS and DM, the product yields did not show noticeable synergistic effects with the exception of the yields of organic compounds, being slightly higher than the predicted average, and the H2 yield, being lower than expected. Co-pyrolysis of SS and DM could be a feasible management alternative for these residues in locations where both residues are generated, since the benefits and the drawbacks of the co-pyrolysis are similar to those of the pyrolysis of each residue.

1 July 2017 in Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fernando BimbelaFernando Bimbela
Fernando Bimbela
Javier ÁbregoJavier Ábrego
Javier Ábrego
RPR. Puerta
R. Puerta
LGLucia Garcia
Lucia Garcia
JAJ. Arauzo
J. Arauzo

5 February 2009 in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Javier ÁbregoJavier Ábrego
Javier Ábrego
JAJesús Arauzo
Jesús Arauzo
JSJosé Luis Sánchez
José Luis Sánchez
AGAlberto Gonzalo
Alberto Gonzalo
TCTomas Cordero
Tomas Cordero
José Rodríguez-MirasolJosé Rodríguez-Mirasol
José Rodríguez-Mirasol

1 September 2018 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Javier ÁbregoJavier Ábrego
Javier Ábrego
DPDaniel Plaza
Daniel Plaza
FLFrancisco Luño
Francisco Luño
María Atienza-MartínezMaría Atienza-Martínez
María Atienza-Martínez
GGGloria Gea
Gloria Gea