Background/Objectives: Nivolumab has significantly improved outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, reliable prognostic biomarkers remain an unmet need. To address this gap, we developed the SUVmax-IPI, a novel prognostic index combining maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) with systemic inflammatory markers. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of SUVmax-IPI in patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab therapy. Methods: This multicenter retrospective analysis included 187 patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving nivolumab across 5 tertiary institutions. The SUVmax-IPI incorporated pretreatment SUVmax and laboratory-based inflammatory prognostic index (IPI) parameters. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank testing and multivariate cox regression. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis established an optimal SUVmax-IPI cut-off of 241.9. Patients with SUVmax-IPI ≤ 241.9 had significantly better survival outcomes: median overall survival (OS) was 35 versus 15 months (p = 0.002). For progression-free survival (PFS), although a numerical difference favored patients with SUVmax-IPI ≤ 241.9 (median: 15 vs. 8 months), this did not reach statistical significance (log-rank p = 0.175). Multivariate analysis confirmed SUVmax-IPI as an independent predictor of survival (p = 0.002). Conclusions: The SUVmax-IPI represents a promising prognostic tool for patients with metastatic NSCLC who received at least 3 months of nivolumab, integrating metabolic and inflammatory parameters to predict survival outcomes.

Background and Objectives: In early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been adopted as the preferred adjuvant approach for patients left with residual invasive disease despite neoadjuvant therapy. The influence of different neoadjuvant regimens on subsequent outcomes in real-world settings remains uncertain. Materials and Methods: From 2019 to 2025, 102 patients treated with adjuvant T-DM1 following surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively assessed. Neoadjuvant regimens included doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by trastuzumab-paclitaxel, doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide with pertuzumab–trastuzumab–docetaxel, or docetaxel–carboplatin–trastuzumab–pertuzumab. Clinical features, treatment response, survival, and toxicity were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 49.7 years, and the majority of patients (80.4%) were aged 40 years or older. Hormone receptor positivity was 82.0%, and invasive ductal carcinoma accounted for 97.1% of cases. Regional responses included 39.2% with axillary pCR despite residual breast lesions, and 5.9% with breast pCR accompanied by axillary disease. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated disease-free survival rates of 100%, 95.2%, and 92.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Adverse events were predominantly grade 1–2, while grade 3–4 toxicities occurred in under 5% of the cohort. Baseline characteristics varied across regimens, reflecting real-world treatment preferences, but survival outcomes remained comparable. Conclusions: Adjuvant T-DM1 was associated with high survival rates and manageable toxicity across different neoadjuvant regimens, underscoring its consistent benefit in routine clinical practice.