Marketing weight is an important economic variable that impacts the productivity and profitability of finishing pig production. Marketing weight has been increasing worldwide over the past decades driven by the dilution of fixed production cost over more weight per pig and the improvement of genetic selection of lean-type pigs. This review was aimed to summarize current knowledge and assess the future research needs on producing finishing pigs with marketing weight greater than 130 kg. Based on a thorough literature review, increasing marketing weight affected overall pig growth; in particular, cumulative average daily gain (ADG) decreased by 4.0 g, average daily feed intake (ADFI) increased by 78.1 g, and gain-to-feed ratio (G:F) decreased by 0.011 for every 10 kg increase of marketing weight. Increasing marketing weight by 10 kg increased carcass yield by 0.41% units, backfat by 1.8 mm, longissimus muscle (LM) area by 1.9 cm², carcass length by 2.2 cm, and belly yield by 0.32% units, but decreased percentage of fat-free-lean by 0.78 units and decreased loin, shoulder, and ham yields by 0.13, 0.16, and 0.17% units, respectively. Studies that investigated the effects of marketing weight on pork quality observed decreased pH by 0.02 and 0.01 at 45 min and 24 h postmortem, respectively, and increased a* value by 0.28 per 10 kg marketing weight increase. Heavier market pigs had increased concentrations of saturated fatty acids and intramuscular fat. However, studies reported conflicting results for L* and b* values, drip loss, Warner-Bratzler shear force, and sensory properties of pigs in response to increasing marketing weight. A limited amount of research has been conducted to estimate nutrient requirements for pigs greater than 140 kg. Increased weight and size of heavy pigs can create challenges to farm and packer facilities and equipment. Discussions and recommendations are provided concerning the adjustments for floor and feeder space, barn design, ventilation, disease control, transportation, and carcass processing needed for increasing marketing weight. In conclusion, increasing marketing weight creates both opportunities and challenges to current finishing pig production, and future research is needed to provide nutritional and management guidelines and improve feed efficiency and meat quality of heavy weight market pigs.

Two studies were conducted to evaluate the growth performance and percentage bone ash of nursery pigs fed various combinations of Ca and P provided by inorganic sources or phytase. In Exp. 1, pens of pigs (n = 720, initially 6.1 ± 0.98 kg) were blocked by initial BW. Within blocks, pens were randomly assigned to one of six treatments (12 pens per treatment) in a three-phase diet regimen. Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial with main effects of Ca (0.58% vs. 1.03%) and standardized total tract digestible (STTD) P (0.33% and 0.45% without phytase, and 0.45% with 0.12% of the P released by phytase). During treatment period, Ca × P interactions were observed for all growth criteria (P < 0.05). When diets had low Ca, pigs fed 0.45% STTD P with phytase had greater (P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI than those fed 0.33% or 0.45% STTD P without phytase. When high Ca was fed, ADG and ADFI were similar among pigs fed 0.45% STTD P with or without phytase and were greater than those fed 0.33% STTD P. Gain:feed was reduced (P < 0.01) when high Ca and low STTD P were fed relative to other treatments. On d 21, radiuses were collected from 1 pig per pen for bone ash analysis. Pigs fed 0.33% STTD P had decreased (P < 0.05) percentage bone ash than those fed 0.45% STTD P with or without phytase when high Ca was fed, but this P effect was not observed for low Ca diets (Ca × P interaction, P = 0.007). In Exp. 2, 36 pens (10 pigs per pen, initially 6.0 ± 1.08 kg) were used in a completely randomized design. Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 3 factorial with the main effects of STTD P (at or above NRC [NRC. 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11^th rev. ed. Washington (DC): National Academic Press.] requirement estimates) and total Ca (0.65, 0.90, and 1.20%). Experimental diets were fed during phases 1 and 2, followed by a common phase 3 diet. Diets at NRC (2012) P level contained 0.45% and 0.40% STTD P, compared with 0.56% and 0.52% for diets greater than the NRC (2012) estimates, in phase 1 and 2, respectively. During treatment period, increasing Ca decreased (linear, P = 0.006) ADG, but increasing STTD P marginally increased (P = 0.084) ADG, with no Ca × P interaction. When diets contained NRC (2012) P levels, pigs fed 1.20% Ca had decreased (P < 0.05) G:F than those fed 0.65% or 0.90% Ca; however, when high STTD P were fed, G:F was not affected by Ca (Ca × P interaction, P = 0.018). In conclusion, excess Ca decreased pig growth and percentage bone ash when diets were at or below NRC (2012) requirement for STTD P, but these negative effects were alleviated by adding monocalcium P or phytase to the diet.

Dietary phosphorus concentration greatly affects pig's growth performance, environmental impact and diet cost. A total of 1080 pigs (initially 5.9 ± 1.08 kg) from three commercial research rooms were used to determine the effects of increasing standardized total tract digestible (STTD) P concentrations in diets without and with phytase on growth performance and percentage bone ash. Pens (10 pigs/pen, 9 pens/treatment) were balanced for equal weights and randomly allotted to 12 treatments. Treatments were arranged in two dose titrations (without or with 2000 units of phytase) with six levels of STTD P each. The STTD P levels were expressed as a percentage of NRC (2012) requirement estimates (% of NRC; 0.45 and 0.40% for phases 1 and 2, respectively) and were: 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 125% and 140% of NRC in diets without phytase and 100%, 110%, 125%, 140%, 155% and 170% of NRC in diets with phytase. Diets were provided in three phases, with experimental diets fed during phases 1 (days 0 to 11) and 2 (days 11 to 25), followed by a common diet from days 25 to 46. On day 25, radius samples from one median-weight gilt per pen were collected for analysis of bone ash. During the treatment period, increasing STTD P from 80% to 140% of NRC in diets without phytase improved average daily gain (ADG; quadratic, P < 0.01), average daily feed intake (ADFI; quadratic, P < 0.05) and gain-feed ratio (G : F; linear, P < 0.01). Estimated STTD P requirement in diets without phytase was 117% and 91% of NRC for maximum ADG according to quadratic polynomial (QP) and broken-line linear (BLL) models, respectively, and was 102%, 119% and >140% of NRC for maximum G : F using BLL, broken-line quadratic and linear models, respectively. When diets contained phytase, increasing STTD P from 100% to 170% of NRC improved ADG (quadratic, P < 0.05) and G : F (linear, P < 0.01). Estimated STTD P requirement in diets containing phytase was 138% for maximum ADG (QP), and 147% (QP) and 116% (BLL) of NRC for maximum G : F. Increasing STTD P increased (linear, P < 0.01) the percentage bone ash regardless of phytase addition. When comparing diets containing the same STTD P levels, phytase increased (P < 0.01) ADG, ADFI and G : F. In summary, estimated STTD P requirements varied depending on the response criteria and statistical models and ranged from 91% to >140% of NRC (0.41% to >0.63% of phase 1 diet and 0.36% to >0.56% of phase 2 diet) in diets without phytase, and from 116% to >170% of NRC (0.52% to >0.77% of phase 1 diet and 0.46% to >0.68% of phase 2 diet) for diets containing phytase. Phytase exerted an extra-phosphoric effect on promoting pig's growth and improved the P dose-responses for ADG and G : F.