Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. National Institute for Health and Care Research.

Ovarian cancer is a malignant disease that affects thousands of patients every year. Currently, we use surgical techniques for early-stage cancer and chemotherapy treatment combinations for advanced stage cancer. Several novel therapies are currently being investigated, with gene therapy and stem cell therapy being the corner stone of this investigation. We conducted a thorough search on PubMed and gathered up-to-date information regarding epithelial ovarian cancer therapies. We present, in the current review, all novel treatments that were investigated in this field over the past five years, with a particular focus on local treatment.

Is pregnancy outcome in triplet pregnancies improved with embryo reduction (ER) to twins compared to expectant management? In trichorionic triplet pregnancies, ER to twins reduces the risk of preterm birth (<34 weeks) without significantly increasing the risk of miscarriage (<24 weeks), whereas in dichorionic triplet pregnancies, the results are inconclusive. Triplet pregnancies are associated with a high risk of miscarriage and preterm birth. ER can ameliorate these conditions in higher order multiple gestations but is still controversial in triplets. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review, following the PRISMA guidelines, and critically appraise ER at 8–14 weeks of gestation in both trichorionic triamniotic (TCTA) and dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) pregnancies. Selective ER to twins was compared with expectant management, focusing on the risks of miscarriage and preterm birth. The computerized database search was performed on 8 January 2017. Overall, from 25 citations of relevance, eight studies with a total of 249 DCTA and 1167 TCTA pregnancies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A comprehensive computerized systematic literature search of all English language studies between 2000 and 2016 was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews (Cochrane Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar. Relevant article reference lists were hand searched. The management options were compared for rates of miscarriage <24 weeks and preterm birth <34 weeks. Only studies with both expectant management and ER to twins were included in the analysis. The quality of each individual article was critically appraised and appropriate statistical methods were used to extract results. In TCTA pregnancies managed expectantly (n = 501), the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were 7.4 and 50.2%, respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated that ER to twins in TCTA pregnancies (n = 666) was associated with a lower risk (17.3 versus 50.2%) of preterm birth (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.28–0.48), whereas the risk of miscarriage (8.1% versus 7.4%) did not significantly increase (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.58–1.98). In DCTA triplets managed expectantly (n = 200), the rates of miscarriage and preterm birth were 8.5 and 51.9%, respectively. Although the meta-analysis was inconclusive, it suggested that ER to twins in DCTA triplets, either of the foetus with a separate placenta (n = 15) or one of the monochorionic pair (n = 34), was neither significantly associated with an increased risk of miscarriage (8.5 versus 13.3%, P = 0.628 and RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.38–3.95, respectively) nor with a lower risk of preterm birth (51.9 versus 46.2%, P = 0.778 and RR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.04–5.7, respectively). No randomized controlled trials of ER versus expectant management in TCTA or DCTA pregnancies were identified from our literature search. We were able to include only a handful of papers with small sample sizes and suffering from bias, and non-English publications were missed. Irrespective of the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, publication bias was evident. The greatest strength of our systematic review is that, contrary to the existing literature, it only included studies with both the intervention and expectant arm. Our results are in agreement with current literature. In TCTA pregnancies, ER to twins is associated with a lower risk of preterm birth but is not associated with a higher risk of miscarriage. In the absence of a randomized trial, the data from systematic reviews appear to be the best existing evidence for counselling in the first trimester on the different options available. Finally, in DCTA pregnancies, indications exist that ER (of one of the MC pair) to twins could possibly reduce the risk of preterm birth without increasing the risk of miscarriage. None to declare. N/A.