Background and Objectives: Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare congenital lung malformation. In adults, intralobar disease with recurrent infection or hemoptysis predominates. Cross-sectional imaging (CTA/MRA) is central to mapping the aberrant systemic supply; catheter angiography is used when noninvasive imaging is inconclusive or when an endovascular procedure is planned. We aimed to synthesize adult PS cases treated with endovascular or hybrid approaches and to summarize case selection, techniques, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-2020-informed systematic review. We searched PubMed and Scopus from 1 January 2000 to 31 May 2025. Two reviewers extracted data independently; due to heterogeneity, we performed a narrative synthesis and a JBI-adapted qualitative risk-of-bias appraisal. Eligible studies enrolled adults (≥18 years) with imaging-confirmed PS treated with embolization, stent-graft exclusion, or hybrid therapy; prespecified outcomes included technical and clinical success, complications, recurrence, and re-intervention. The review was not registered. Results: Of 93 records screened, 41 publications reporting 48 adults were included. Twenty-five patients were managed endovascularly and 23 with hybrid therapy. Intralobar sequestration predominated (36/48); feeding arteries most often arose from the descending thoracic aorta (28/48). Complications were reported in 10 cases, mostly minor; three embolization cases required re-intervention. Conclusions: Endovascular therapy is useful for selected anatomies and urgent bleeding control, while hybrid strategies may benefit large, complex, or aneurysmal feeding arteries. The evidence base is limited to small case reports/series with heterogeneous outcome definitions and follow-up, precluding quantitative synthesis. Standardized outcome definitions, structured follow-up, and prospective registries are needed.

Although radial access is the current gold standard for the implementation of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), post-procedural radial compression devices are seldom compared with each other in terms of safety or efficacy. Our group aimed to compare a cost effective and potentially green method to dedicated radial compression devices, with respect to access site complications combined in a device oriented complex endpoint (DOCE), freedom from which served as our primary endpoint. Patients undergoing PCI were randomized to receive either the cost effective or a dedicated device, either of which were removed using patent hemostasis. Twenty-four hours after the procedure, radial artery ultrasonography was performed to evaluate the access site. The primary endpoint was assessed using a non-inferiority framework with a non-inferiority margin of five percentage points, which was considered as the least clinically meaningful difference. The cost-effective technique and the dedicated devices were associated with a comparably low rate of complications (freedom from DOCE: 83.3% vs. 70.8%, absolute risk difference: 12.5%, one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11%). Composition of the DOCE (i.e., no complication, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, and radial artery occlusion) and compression time were also assessed in superiority tests as secondary endpoints. Both the cost-effective technique and the dedicated devices were associated with comparably low rates of complications: p = 0.1289. All radial compression devices performed similarly when considering the time to complete removal of the respective device (120.0 (inter-quartile range: 100.0–142.5) for the vial vs. 120.0 (inter-quartile range: 110.0–180) for the dedicated device arm, with a median difference of [95% CI]: 7.0 [−23.11 to 2.00] min, p = 0.2816). In conclusion, our cost-effective method was found to be non-inferior to the dedicated devices with respect to safety, therefore it is a safe alternative to dedicated radial compression devices, as well as seeming to be similarly effective.