To determine the epithelial phenotype in patients with a limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) after ocular surface reconstruction with autologous cultured stem cells. To correlate the epithelial phenotype with the clinical outcome. Six eyes affected by LSCD, verified and graded by impression cytology, were treated with an autologous fibrin-cultured limbal stem cell graft. The clinical outcome was defined as a "success" or a "failure," depending on ocular surface stability. To improve their visual function, 4 patients underwent lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty after the stem cell graft. The phenotype of the regenerated corneal epithelium was determined by immunofluorescence of the corneal button to detect CK12, CK3, CK19, and Muc1 as corneal and conjunctival markers. After a mean follow-up of 24 months, 5 cases were defined as successes; 1 case presented an epithelial defect 4 months after grafting and was defined as a failure. Immunofluorescence performed on 4 patients after lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty confirmed the presence of epithelial corneal markers (CK12 and CK3) in 2 of the success cases and the presence of conjunctival markers (CK19 and Muc1) in the 1 failure case. In one of the success cases, both corneal and conjunctival markers were detected on the corneal button. All success cases showed maintenance of marker accounting for high proliferative potential (DeltaNp63alpha) after transplantation. Autologous cultures of limbal stem cells can regenerate a functional corneal epithelium in patients affected by unilateral LSCD. We showed a correlation between the clinical outcome and the molecular marker expression.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of cornea transplantation (penetrating keratoplasty, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty) using donor corneas stored in Eusol-C hypothermic storage medium compared to corneas stored in organ-culture. Methods: The clinical outcomes of 92 patients who underwent corneal transplantation with human donor corneas stored in Eusol-C medium at 2–8 °C were retrospectively evaluated. The control group consisted of 169 patients who received corneas organ-cultured at 31 °C. Donor age, sex, death-to-preservation time, and storage time were recorded. Endothelial cell (EC) density (ECD), EC mortality, and EC morphology scores were evaluated during storage in both groups. Complication rates, visual outcomes, and corneal transparency were monitored for up to six months. Results: The mean storage in Eusol-C time was 7.7 ± 2.5 days, while organ-culture time was 14.2 ± 4.0 days. In the Eusol-C group, ECD was 2398 ± 354 cells/mm², with an average EC morphology score of 3.4 ± 0.7/4. Approximately 28% of the corneas in the Eusol-C group had no EC mortality. In the organ-culture group, ECD was 2256 ± 328 cells/mm², with an average EC morphology score of 3.5 ± 0.5/4, and 42% were devoid of EC mortality. No complications, such as re-bubbling, were observed in both groups during surgery. Transparent corneas were achieved in 81.3% of the Eusol-C group the day after surgery. Mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 3 and 6 months was 4.5 ± 4.0/10 and 5.4 ± 3.7/10 for the Eusol-C group and 5.0 ± 2.9/10 and 5.7 ± 2.8/10 for the organ-culture group, with no statistical differences observed between the groups. No graft failure was observed up to three months. Graft rejection occurred in the Eusol-C group and in the organ-culture group in, respectively, one and two cases at the six-month follow-up. Conclusions: Comparable surgical outcomes were achieved with donor corneas stored in both hypothermic Eusol-C and organ-culture media.

Objectives: To evaluate whether preoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) parameters differ according to Big Bubble (BB) formation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in patients with TGFBI-related corneal stromal dystrophies (CSD). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 17 eyes from 12 patients undergoing DALK with an attempted BB technique. Stromal deposit depth was assessed by AS-OCT using both a categorical depth-based classification (anterior, mid-, and posterior stroma) and continuous measurements of stromal involvement (µm). The ratio between stromal involvement and the thinnest corneal point was calculated. Intraoperative data included BB success, BB type, and complications. Inter-eye correlation was accounted for in comparisons of continuous variables using linear mixed-effects models. Results: BB formation was achieved in 11 of 17 eyes (64.7%), with type 1 BB observed in all successful cases. BB success was observed in all eyes with anterior or mid-stromal involvement and in 33.3% of eyes with posterior stromal involvement. Greater stromal deposit depth and a higher stromal-depth-to-thinnest-point ratio were observed in eyes in which BB formation failed (p < 0.01). No intraoperative perforations or conversions to penetrating keratoplasty occurred. Inter-observer agreement for AS-OCT measurements was high. Conclusions: BB failure was more frequent in eyes with greater absolute and relative stromal deposit depth, as assessed by preoperative AS-OCT during DALK in TGFBI-related CSD. These AS-OCT-derived parameters may support surgical planning and improve patient selection for BB DALK in this clinical setting.

Eyelid anomalies represent a relevant cause of corneal injury, including epithelial instability and recurrent erosions up to progressive stromal thinning, corneal melt, and, in severe cases, perforation leading to permanent visual impairment. Correction of eyelid dysfunction is the first step in managing these lesions. However, corneal damage may persist or progress despite adequate eyelid treatment. Therefore, a corneal surgical approach is necessary to preserve ocular surface integrity and visual function. This review synthesizes literature published between 2008 and 2025 on corneal complications secondary to eyelid anomalies and postoperative eyelid procedures. We analyzed the mechanisms of eyelid-induced corneal injury, indications for surgical treatment, and corneal surgical strategies, from surface-stabilizing techniques to tectonic interventions. Entropion and ectropion are the most common eyelid abnormalities associated with mechanical trauma and exposure-related corneal disease. Although definitive eyelid correction is necessary for corneal recovery, persistent epithelial defects, stromal thinning, corneal melt, and perforation frequently require corneal surgical management. Surface-stabilizing procedures, such as amniotic membrane transplantation, are effective in early disease stages, whereas progressive stromal defects necessitate tectonic approaches such as lamellar patch grafting or therapeutic keratoplasty. Interventions aimed at visual rehabilitation should be postponed until sustained ocular surface stability has been achieved. Effective management of eyelid-related corneal damage requires both eyelid surgical correction and corneal management. Close collaboration between corneal and oculoplastic surgeons helps achieving good anatomical outcomes and long-term ocular surface stability.

Background/objectives: The continuous necessity to support biostrumental data with biolomecular data collected using non-invasive tools is influencing the world of ocular surface devices. The ocular imprint still represents a non-invasive and safety technique for collecting corneal and conjunctival epithelia in an easy way, as performed in human and veterinary clinics. Although used in clinical practice since 1977, operators might benefit from improvements in these techniques, especially in terms of handling and management. Methods: Herein, by reporting the design and characteristics of a patent of ocular surface sampling (the SurfAL pen and periocular-assisted SurfAL pen; PCT WO2016IB51474 20160316), we performed a validation and analysis of its value compared to gold standards. The level-headedness and advantages of this device were verified in 15 sclerocorneal specimens (sampling advantages) and tested in 25 volunteers (handling and operator efficiency, as well as frequency of discomfort in volunteers). Morphological as well as biomolecular analyses were used to compare SurfAL devices with conventional ones. Results: The easy management of SurfAL pens and the good detection of epithelial/goblet cells were confirmed. The SurfAL pen was found to be smart and suitable for routine analysis, as confirmed by quick and reproducible onsite sampling. Periocular-assisted SurfAL pen was comparable in terms of sampling quality but less comparable in terms of subject confidence due to its geometry. Conclusions: This study suggests that the SurfAL pen and periocular-assisted SurfAL pen might represent an additional and hands-on way of sampling ocular surface cells and improve the diagnostic route in ophthalmology.