Nathalie Labonnote

Dr. Nathalie Labonnote


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Automation in Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NLNathalie Labonnote
Nathalie Labonnote
ARAnders Rønnquist
Anders Rønnquist
BMBendik Manum
Bendik Manum
PRPetra Rüther
Petra Rüther

1 September 2017 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKlodian Gradeci
Klodian Gradeci
NLNathalie Labonnote
Nathalie Labonnote
BTBerit Time
Berit Time
JKJochen Köhler
Jochen Köhler

1 October 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SFSelamawit Mamo Fufa
Selamawit Mamo Fufa
CSChristofer Skaar
Christofer Skaar
KGKlodian Gradeci
Klodian Gradeci
NLNathalie Labonnote
Nathalie Labonnote

1 January 2018 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKlodian Gradeci
Klodian Gradeci
NLNathalie Labonnote
Nathalie Labonnote
BTBerit Time
Berit Time
JKJochen Köhler
Jochen Köhler

1 January 2019 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKlodian Gradeci
Klodian Gradeci
NLNathalie Labonnote
Nathalie Labonnote
ESEdvard Sivertsen
Edvard Sivertsen
BTBerit Time
Berit Time

10 July 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristofer Skaar
Christofer Skaar
NLNathalie Labonnote
Nathalie Labonnote
KGKlodian Gradeci
Klodian Gradeci
The building industry is responsible for approximately 40% of energy consumption and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union (EU). The most efficient way of reducing a building’s environmental impact is addressing it in the design stage. Here, design freedom is the greatest, but uncertainty is high and there is a nearly limitless number of design options. Based on experiences with zero emission buildings (ZEB) and zero emission neighbourhoods (ZEN), a mapping review has been conducted to analyse how parametric life cycle assessment (LCA) and algorithms have been used to address neighbourhoods, buildings, and construction materials. Results have identified a general gap of knowledge regarding the use of parametric LCA models for decision-support purposes, demonstrated by the substantial focus on analytical methods compared to procedural methods. Implications for the evolution from ZEB to ZEN are twofold: (i) an integrated approach with multiple tools and methods is required, and (ii) further development of algorithms in the tool are needed to address complexity, sensitivity, and uncertainty. This study is expected to foster the development of algorithmic approaches to improve the ZEB tool as a decision-support tool. Further research should address the key questions of when and how.