Renee-Louise Franche

Dr. Renee-Louise Franche


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2013 in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EMEleanor Murray
Eleanor Murray
RFRenee-Louise Franche
Renee-Louise Franche
SISelahadin Ibrahim
Selahadin Ibrahim
PSPeter M Smith
Peter M Smith
NCNancy Carnide
Nancy Carnide
CMCameron Mustard
Cameron Mustard

16 October 2010 in Rural and Remote Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRenee-Louise Franche
Renee-Louise Franche
EMEleanor Murray
Eleanor Murray
AOAleck Ostry
Aleck Ostry
PRPamela Ratner
Pamela Ratner
SWShannon Wagner
Shannon Wagner
HHHenry G Harder
Henry G Harder
RRH: Rural and Remote Health. Published article number: 1502 - Work disability prevention in rural healthcare workers

10 December 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSusan R Stock
Susan R Stock
NNNicolakakis Nektaria
Nicolakakis Nektaria
KCKim Cullen
Kim Cullen
CDClermont E. Dionne
Clermont E. Dionne
RFRenee-Louise Franche
Renee-Louise Franche
INIuliana Nastasia Nastasia
Iuliana Nastasia Nastasia
Background/Objectives: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) contribute to work disability arising from personal and work-related physical, organizational and psychosocial factors that often differentially affect men and women. We aimed to identify determinants of the sex/gender difference in duration of MSD work absence through a mixed-studies systematic review. Methods: We synthesized evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach adapted to prognostic studies and meta-ethnography for qualitative studies, followed by a mixed synthesis. Results: Twenty-six quantitative and four qualitative studies contributed to the evidence synthesis. Only two of the twenty-six quantitative studies addressed the sex/gender gap directly, compared to three of the four qualitative studies. Most other quantitative studies provided evidence from sex/gender-stratified analyses of determinants of MSD disability. The synthesis of qualitative studies suggested that domestic strain, less access to modified work/retraining, and gender-biased attitudes of health and insurance system gatekeepers hindered women’s return to work. Prognostic factors in women supporting this conclusion from quantitative studies included the combination “working ≥ 40 h/week and having dependents” and low supervisor support. The mixed synthesis yielded a conceptual model of hypothesized determinants of the sex/gender difference in MSD work disability that integrates factors from personal, workplace, healthcare and insurance–disability management spheres, influenced by the larger sociopolitical, cultural and macroeconomic context. Conclusions: Studies directly addressing the sex/gender gap in MSD disability are needed. These can be informed by the proposed model. Practitioners and policymakers can build upon the model to develop and implement MSD prevention and rehabilitation interventions tailored to the needs of men and women to reduce sex/gender disparities.