What is already known about this topic? Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers among HIV-positive women. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended a program of cervical cancer screening for HIV-positive women. Prospective follow-up studies and specific recommendations on cervical cancer screening for HIV-positive women in China are not currently being performed. What is added by this report? Among HIV-positive women from high HIV-burden areas of China, the detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in the baseline survey and the incidence of CIN2+ in the follow-up survey after 18 months was high. High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection and early (< 18 years old) sexual debut was associated with CIN2+ among HIV-positive women. What are the implications for public health practice? HIV-positive women need cervical cancer prevention and regular screening services. These women might benefit from a cervical cancer screening program that combines hrHPV test and cytology and has short intervals between screenings.

Background: Although COVID-19 vaccines are currently under use in pregnant and postpartum women, there is still lack of evidence regarding safety and effectiveness in these populations. This study aims to describe the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant and postpartum women in the early stage of vaccination campaign in Brazil. Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study using data from the Brazilian surveillance information system for adverse events (SI-EAPV) to characterize the safety of COVID-19 vaccines available (Sinovac/Butantan, Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca and Janssen) in Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women after receiving it from April to August 2021. A descriptive analysis was performed to assess the frequency and incidence rate of the adverse events (AE) for COVID-19 vaccines. Results: A total of 3,333 adverse events following COVID-19 immunization were reported for the study population in the SIEAPV. The incidence of AE found was 309.4/100,000 doses (95% CI 297.23, 321.51). Regarding the four vaccines available in the country, Sinovac/Butantan had the lowest incidence (74.08/100,000 doses; 95% CI 63.47, 84.69). Systemic events were the most frequent notified for the group (82.07%), followed by local (11.93%) and maternal (4.74%), being most of them classified as non-severe (90.65%). Conclusion: A similar pattern of AE as stated in other studies was found, with even better results for non-viral vector vaccines, corroborating to the recommendation of vaccination for these groups. Even though, further studies appraising a longer observation time are still needed to provide a broader safety aspect for the vaccines currently under use for this population.

Background: The persistence of non-neonatal tetanus (non-NT) highlights the necessity of adult booster vaccines and post-traumatic prophylaxis. This Phase I/III clinical trial aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a new adsorbed tetanus vaccine. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled clinical trial was conducted in Henan Province, China. A total of 1258 healthy participants aged 18–44 years (60 in Phase I and 1198 in Phase III) were enrolled, with no history of tetanus infection, or tetanus toxoid-containing vaccines (TTCVs) vaccination within the past 10 years. The participants were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either the investigational vaccine or the licensed control vaccine. The Phase III clinical trial was initiated subsequent to the 7-day safety observation period following vaccination in the Phase I trial. The objective of the Phase III clinical trial was to assess the non-inferiority of the seroconversion rate of tetanus antibodies at 30 days post-vaccination with the investigational vaccine compared to the control vaccine. Serum samples were collected prior to and at 30 days post-vaccination. Adverse events were monitored for 30 days, with serious adverse events (SAEs) followed up for 6 months post-vaccination. Results: The investigational group achieved a seroconversion rate of 99.48%, which was non-inferior to that of the control group (99.66%), with a negligible rate difference of −0.17% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.20%, 0.78%). The investigational group exhibited a significantly higher geometric mean concentration (GMC) of antibodies (4.721 IU/mL vs. 3.627 IU/mL, p < 0.0001). Among the susceptible participants, the seroconversion rates were 99.78% in the investigational group and 99.79% in the control group, respectively, with a non-inferior rate difference of −0.01% (95%CI: −1.06%, 0.97%). Furthermore, the investigational group showed a low incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) within 30 days post-vaccination (12.26%), which was comparable to that of the control group (13.65%). All the reported ARs were mild or moderate, and no SAEs were associated with the vaccination. Conclusions: The new adsorbed tetanus vaccine demonstrated favorable safety and comparable immunogenicity to the marketed control vaccine, with a significantly higher antibody GMC, supporting its clinical application in tetanus prevention.