XING MENG

Dr. XING MENG

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 December 2024 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChaoying Hu
Chaoying Hu
YZYibo Zhou
Yibo Zhou
XMXING MENG
XING MENG
JLJianhua Li
Jianhua Li
JCJinxia Chen
Jinxia Chen
RJRonghua Jin
Ronghua Jin
Background: A broad-spectrum anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), SA55, is highly effective against SARS-CoV-2 variants. This trial aimed at demonstrating the safety, tolerability, local drug retention and neutralizing activity, systemic exposure level, and immunogenicity of the SA55 nasal spray in healthy individuals. Methods: This phase I, dose-escalation clinical trial combined an open-label design with a randomized, controlled, double-blind design. Healthy participants aged 18–65 years were enrolled and received a single dose of the SA55 nasal spray (1 mg or 2 mg) or multiple doses of SA55 nasal spray/placebo for 7 days (1 or 2 mg/dose, 3 or 6 doses/day). Safety monitoring was conducted throughout the study. Nasal swabs and venous blood samples were collected to analyze local drug concentration/neutralization, systemic exposure, and immunogenicity. Results: From 2 June to 11 August 2023, 80 participants were enrolled and received study intervention. The severity of adverse reactions (ADRs) reported during the study was mild in all cases, and all ADRs were laboratory test abnormalities without corresponding symptoms or vital signs. A total of 9 ADRs were reported, of which all were mild in severity. Overall ADR incidence rate was 16.67% (8/48) in single-dose groups and 4.17% (1/24) in multiple-dose groups. The nasal local drug concentration and neutralizing activity were generally stable within 4–8 h, with favorable neutralization activity against Omicron BF.7 and XBB strains. Conclusions: This study demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability of the SA55 nasal spray in healthy volunteers, exhibited satisfactory neutralizing activity against Omicron variants intranasally, and indicated low systemic toxicity risk.

26 September 2023 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNicole Le Corre
Nicole Le Corre
KAKatia Abarca
Katia Abarca
PPPatricio Astudillo Paredes
Patricio Astudillo Paredes
MPMarcela Potin
Marcela Potin
SLSofía López
Sofía López
AKAlexis Kalergis
Alexis Kalergis
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of vaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2 was rapidly established. This study describes the safety of CoronaVac® in children and adolescents between 3- and 17-years-old in a multicenter study in Chile with two vaccine doses in a 4-week interval. For all participants, immediate adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) were registered throughout the study. In the safety subgroup, AEs were recorded 28 days after each dose. COVID-19 surveillance was performed throughout the study. A total of 1139 individuals received the first and 1102 the second dose of CoronaVac®; 835 were in the safety subgroup. The first dose showed the highest number of AEs: up to 22.2% of participants reported any local and 17.1% systemic AE. AEs were more frequent in adolescents after the first dose, were transient, and mainly mild. Pain at the inoculation site was the most frequent AE for all ages. Fever was the most frequent systemic AE for 3–5 years old and headache in 6–17 years old. No SAEs or AESIs related to vaccination occurred. Most of the COVID-19 cases were mild and managed as outpatients. CoronaVac® was safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents, with different safety patterns according to age.

17 December 2021 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
YQYaping Qiao
Yaping Qiao
AAAriane de Jesus Lopes de Abreu
Ariane de Jesus Lopes de Abreu
CDCarolina Zampirolli Dias
Carolina Zampirolli Dias
XMXING MENG
XING MENG
RFRafaela Vansan Ferreira
Rafaela Vansan Ferreira
WYWeidong Yin
Weidong Yin
Background: Although COVID-19 vaccines are currently under use in pregnant and postpartum women, there is still lack of evidence regarding safety and effectiveness in these populations. This study aims to describe the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant and postpartum women in the early stage of vaccination campaign in Brazil. Methods: This is an observational cross-sectional study using data from the Brazilian surveillance information system for adverse events (SI-EAPV) to characterize the safety of COVID-19 vaccines available (Sinovac/Butantan, Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca and Janssen) in Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women after receiving it from April to August 2021. A descriptive analysis was performed to assess the frequency and incidence rate of the adverse events (AE) for COVID-19 vaccines. Results: A total of 3,333 adverse events following COVID-19 immunization were reported for the study population in the SIEAPV. The incidence of AE found was 309.4/100,000 doses (95% CI 297.23, 321.51). Regarding the four vaccines available in the country, Sinovac/Butantan had the lowest incidence (74.08/100,000 doses; 95% CI 63.47, 84.69). Systemic events were the most frequent notified for the group (82.07%), followed by local (11.93%) and maternal (4.74%), being most of them classified as non-severe (90.65%). Conclusion: A similar pattern of AE as stated in other studies was found, with even better results for non-viral vector vaccines, corroborating to the recommendation of vaccination for these groups. Even though, further studies appraising a longer observation time are still needed to provide a broader safety aspect for the vaccines currently under use for this population.