Ingela Becker-Grupe

Mrs. Ingela Becker-Grupe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 September 2025 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDmitry Romanov
Dmitry Romanov
IBIngela Becker-Grupe
Ingela Becker-Grupe
AJAmir M. Jodeiri
Amir M. Jodeiri
MCMarco Cozzini
Marco Cozzini
SHStefan Holler
Stefan Holler
Compared to shallow geothermal systems, coaxial medium-deep and deep borehole heat exchangers (MDBHE and DBHE) offer higher temperatures and heat extraction rates while requiring less surface area, making them attractive options for sustainable heat supply in combination with ground-source heat pumps (GSHP). However, existing simulation tools for such systems are often limited in computational efficiency or open-source availability. To address this gap, we propose a rapid modeling approach using the open-source Python package “pygfunction” (v2.3.0). Its workflow was adjusted to accept the fluid inlet temperature as input. The effective undisturbed ground temperature and ground thermophysical properties were weight-averaged considering stratified ground layers. Validation of the approach was conducted by comparing simulation results with 12 references, including established models and experimental data. The proposed method enables fast estimation of fluid temperatures and heat extraction rates for single boreholes and small-scale bore fields in both homogeneous and heterogeneous geological conditions at depths of 700–3000 m, thus supporting rapid assessments of the coefficient of performance (COP) of GSHP. The approach systematically underestimates fluid outlet temperatures by up to 2–3 °C, resulting in a maximum underestimation of COP of 4%. Under significant groundwater flow or extreme geothermal gradients, these errors may increase to 4 °C and 6%, respectively. Based on the available data, these discrepancies may result in errors in GSHP electric power estimation of approximately ±10%. The method offers practical value for GSHP performance evaluation, geothermal potential mapping, and district heating network planning, supporting geologists, engineers, planners, and decision-makers.