Urmila Gupta Phutela

Dr. Urmila Gupta Phutela


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 January 2023 in Phytochemistry Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKManpreet Kaur
Manpreet Kaur
SBSurekha Bhatia
Surekha Bhatia
UPUrmila Gupta Phutela
Urmila Gupta Phutela
Eric DeckerEric Decker
Eric Decker
YTYamini Tak
Yamini Tak
SBSaroj Bala
Saroj Bala




15 April 2025 in Fermentation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPriya Pilania
Priya Pilania
KBKeshani Bhushan
Keshani Bhushan
UPUrmila Gupta Phutela
Urmila Gupta Phutela
Electro-fermentation (EF) is an emerging bioprocess with the ability to regulate the metabolism of electrochemically active microorganisms. In various fermentation processes, electrodes perform either as an electron acceptor or donor, facilitating the formation and movement of electrons and protons. The bioelectric activity created by external electrodes enhances the metabolic reactions, resulting in a higher yield of value-added chemicals. The conventional fermentation process has a number of limitations in terms of usability and economic feasibility, whereas electro-fermentation presents a hybrid technology, minimizing redox instabilities and enhancing the metabolic process in general to achieve increased product production and a higher biomass yield. Electrochemically active microorganisms such as Geobacter and Shewanella species can carry out the exchange of electrons with electrodes directly or indirectly by using electron mediators. Furthermore, the integration of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) precludes the need for external manipulation of the fermentation system as the required change in electrochemical gradient is provided by the MFC counterpart. The major beneficial aspects of electro-fermentation include its role as a potential tool for enhancing the production of value-added compounds. The mixed-culture system clearly had a favorable impact on the synthesis of butyric acid from rice straw. Furthermore, cathodic electro-fermentation (CEF) exhibited benefits over anaerobic fermentation, influencing NADH/NAD+, enabling a higher product titer, and reducing the accumulation of byproducts. Hence, in this review, we emphasize the importance of electro-fermentation over conventional fermentation for biofuel and biochemical production, covering its fundamentals, interactions, types, future challenges, and ability to provide several benefits to boost the fermentation process, such as the process efficiency and product yield, on an industrial scale.

10 October 2025 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKarvembu Palanisamy
Karvembu Palanisamy
GPGowthami Palanisamy
Gowthami Palanisamy
YIYeong Min Im
Yeong Min Im
STSadhasivam Thangarasu
Sadhasivam Thangarasu
UPUrmila Gupta Phutela
Urmila Gupta Phutela
TOTaehwan Oh
Taehwan Oh
Polymer-based aerogels have recently received considerable research attention as a favorable option for oil–water separation due to their enhanced porous 3D structure with great specific surface area, low density and outstanding sorption behavior. Additionally, polymer-containing aerogels exhibit more favorable characteristic properties, such as being lipophilic–hydrophobic (superhydrophobic–superoleophilic), hydrophilic–lipophobic (superhydrophilic–underwater oleophobic), or other specific wetness forms, including anisotropic and dual-wettability. In this review, cellulose and cellulose-based materials used as an aerogel for oil–water separation are comprehensively reviewed. This review highlights the significance of cellulose and cellulose-based combinations through structure–property interactions, surface modifications (using different hydrophilic and hydrophobic agents), and aerogel formation, focusing on the light density and high surface area of aerogels for effective oil–water separation. This article provides an in-depth review of four primary classifications of cellulose-based aerogels, namely, cellulose aerogels (regenerated cellulose and bacterial cellulose), cellulose with biopolymer-based aerogels (chitosan, lignin, and alginate), cellulose with synthetic polymer aerogels (polyvinyl alcohol, polyetherimide, polydopamine and others), and cellulose with organic/inorganic (such as SiO2, MTMS, and tannic acid) material-based aerogels. Furthermore, the aspects of performance, scalability, and durability have been explained, alongside potential prospect directions for the advancement of cellulose aerogels aimed at their widespread application. This review article stands apart from previously published review works and represents the comprehensive review on cellulose-based aerogels for oil–water separation, featuring wide-ranging classifications.