The Caoziwa Pb–Zn deposit is one of the typical vein-type Pb–Zn deposits in the western part of the Tengchong block. Due to limited research, the genesis of these deposits is unknown. In this study, the sulfur isotopic and trace elemental compositions of sulfides from the Caoziwa Pb–Zn deposit were analyzed to trace the sources of ore-forming materials, and to reveal the genetic type of this deposit. The results show that abundant Co, Ni, As, and Se, and less Cu, Zn, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, Te, Pb, and Bi could enter pyrite by isomorphic substitution. Elemental Mn, Fe, Cd, Co, and Ni could substitute Zn to enter sphalerite, while the contents of Ag, Sn, and Sb are mainly controlled by the Pb-rich inclusions in sphalerite. Elemental Bi, Sb, Cd, Sn, Ag, and Tl mainly enter the galena grains via an isomorphic substitution mechanism of (Bi, Sb)³⁺ + (Cd, Sn)²⁺ + (Ag, Tl)⁺ ↔ 2Pb²⁺. Both sulfur isotopic compositions and trace elemental compositions indicate that the ore-forming materials and fluids of the Caoziwa Pb–Zn deposit mainly originate from magmatic hydrothermal fluid related to Paleocene granitic magmatism. Combined with the geological facts that some skarnizations developed in the northern part of the ore field near the Paleocene granite, the Caoziwa Pb–Zn deposit is suggested to be a magmatic hydrothermal vein-type deposit that probably belongs to a distal part of a skarn mineralization system developed by the intrusion of Paleocene granitic magmatism in the western part of the Tengchong block.

The Mahuaping deposit is the largest Be-W-F deposit in the Jinshajiang–Ailaoshan metallogenic belt, Sanjiang region, SW China, with more than 72,700 t WO₃, 41700 t BeO and 2.3 Mt CaF₂. Despite recent studies, the ore-forming process of the Mahuaping deposit remains poorly understood, limiting further insight into its genesis. In this study, a new muscovite Rb-Sr age and elemental compositions of beryl have been reported to constrain the mineralization age and evolution of ore-forming fluids. Muscovite Rb-Sr isochron dating reveals the mineralization age of the Mahuaping Be-W-F deposit is 28.0 ± 1.5 Ma, indicating the formation of the Mahuaping deposit is probably related to the magmatism caused by the sinistral shearing of crust in the Oligocene. LA-ICP-MS elemental mapping and spot analysis suggest the mechanisms for the incorporation of trace elements into the beryl lattice primarily involve two substitution types: Be²⁺ ↔ Li⁺ + Na⁺/Cs⁺ in the crystal core, and Al³⁺ ↔ (Fe²⁺/Mg²⁺) + (Na⁺/Cs⁺/Rb⁺) occurring in both the core and rim. The enrichment of Fe²⁺ is responsible for the blue coloration observed in beryl. The compositional variation from core to rim in beryl crystal indicates the initial ore-forming fluid of the Mahuaping deposit is reducing and acidic, and dominantly originated from magmatic fluids derived from the highly evolved magma. During the evolution, in addition to the continuous mixing of meteoric water, due to pulsating exsolution, the magmatic fluids were also replenished into the ore-forming fluid, enhancing water/rock interaction.