Gediminas Kastiukas

Dr. Gediminas Kastiukas

Department of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2017 in Engineering Fracture Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wei (David) DongWei (David) Dong
Wei (David) Dong
ZWZhimin Wu
Zhimin Wu
Xiangming ZhouXiangming Zhou
Xiangming Zhou
NWNa Wang
Na Wang
Gediminas KastiukasGediminas Kastiukas
Gediminas Kastiukas

1 May 2020 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gediminas KastiukasGediminas Kastiukas
Gediminas Kastiukas
SRShaoqin Ruan
Shaoqin Ruan
SLShuang Liang
Shuang Liang
XZXiangming Zhou
Xiangming Zhou

22 November 2016 in Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Wei (David) DongWei (David) Dong
Wei (David) Dong
DYD Yang
D Yang
XZX Zhou
X Zhou
Gediminas KastiukasGediminas Kastiukas
Gediminas Kastiukas
BZB Zhang
B Zhang


13 June 2017 in Frontiers in Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Xiangming ZhouXiangming Zhou
Xiangming Zhou
HSHarmeet Saini
Harmeet Saini
Gediminas KastiukasGediminas Kastiukas
Gediminas Kastiukas
In recent years, the construction industry has seen a significant rise in the use of natural fibers, for producing building materials. Research has shown that treated hemp fiber-reinforced concrete (THFRC) can provide a low-cost building material for residential and low-rise buildings, while achieving sustainable construction and meeting future environmental targets. This study involved enhancing the mechanical properties of hemp fiber-reinforced concrete through the Ca(OH)2 solution pretreatment of fibers. Both untreated (UHFRC) and treated (THFRC) hemp fiber-reinforced concrete were tested containing 15-mm length fiber, at a volume fraction of 1%. From the mechanical strength tests, it was observed that the 28-day tensile and compressive strength of THFRC was 16.9 and 10% higher, respectively, than UHFRC. Based on the critical stress intensity factor (KICs) and critical strain energy release rate (GICs), the fracture toughness of THFRC at 28 days was also found to be 7–13% higher than UHFRC. Additionally, based on the determined brittleness number (Q) and modulus of elasticity, the THFRC was found to be 11% less brittle and 10.8% more ductile. Furthermore, qualitative analysis supported many of the mechanical strength findings through favorable surface roughness observed on treated fibers and resistance to fiber pull-out.

1 May 2017 in Engineering Failure Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wei (David) DongWei (David) Dong
Wei (David) Dong
ZWZhimin Wu
Zhimin Wu
Xiangming ZhouXiangming Zhou
Xiangming Zhou
LDLiheng Dong
Liheng Dong
Gediminas KastiukasGediminas Kastiukas
Gediminas Kastiukas